Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Nephrol. Mar 25, 2025; 14(1): 97373
Published online Mar 25, 2025. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i1.97373
Table 1 Summary of included studies
Ref.
Country
Population
Tool for EF assessment
No. of participants
No. of living donor RTRs
Type of renal transplant anastomosis
Age ± SD
Months of dialysis before RT ± SD
Time point of EF assessment (months after RT)
No. of patients with smoking
No. of patients with hypertension
No. of patients with diabetes
Testosterone prior to RT (ng/dL)
Gontero et al[18]ItalyAdult males on HD undergoing RTEF domain of IIEF-1522NAEnd-to-side external iliac artery51 ± 10.511.5 ± 5.5 3NANANA410 ± 182
Mirone et al[19]ItalyAdult males on HD undergoing RTEF domain of IIEF-15780Internal or external iliac arteryNANA3NANANANA
Nanjappa et al[27]IndiaAdult males on HD undergoing RTIIEF-5NANANANANANA3763NANA
Nassir[20]Saudi ArabiaAdult males with sexual partners on HD or dialysisEF domain of IIEF-1525NANA49.2 ± 11.422 ± 18.8NANANANANA
Pourmand et al[21]IranAdult males on HD undergoing RTIIEF-564NACommon iliac artery: 841.1 ± 8.741.8 ± 31.9NANANANANA
Pyrgidis et al[28]EgyptHepatitis C virus+ adult males on dialysisIIEF-5640NA50.1 ± 6.112.8 ± 20.5NANANANA307 ± 94
Teng et al[22]ChinaAdult males on dialysis undergoing RTEF domain of IIEF-1524NAInternal iliac artery44.7 ± 9.8NANANANANANA
Javid et al[23]IranSexually active adult males on MHDNANAInternal and external iliac artery43.24 ± 8.7312
Pan et al[24]ChinaAdult males on maintenance hemodialysis undergoing Ktx who suffered from SARS-COV-2 infectionNANANA40.2 ± 9.732.5 ± 35.36
El hennawy et al[25]Saudi ArabiaAdult males on maintenance hemodialysis undergoing Ktx 68NANA48.96+/-12.912
Mondal et al[26] IndiaAdult males on maintenance hemodialysis undergoing Ktx NANANA40.9 ± 9.913.6 ± 0.43
Table 2 Study parameters for meta-analysis
Ref.
No. of patients with SexDys before Ktx
No. of patients with SexDys after Ktx
MEAN IIEF difference with 95%CI
Smoking
HTN
Diabetes
Testosterone prior Ktx
RR
Upper limit RR
Lower limit RR
Weight age for SexDys before and after transplant (565)
Weight age for mean IIEF difference
Pre-KTX IIEF
Post-KTX IIEF
Gontero et al[18]65/8742/87-4.4 (-6.67, -2.13)13191410 ± 182419 ± 1292.181.23.950.03890.03588922.5 ± 7.0918.09 ± 6.33
Mirone et al[19]68/7871/780.9 (-1.53, -.27)16697NANA0.670.241.860.1380.1272442.4639.97
Nanjappa et al[27]12/167/168.00 (4.75, 11.25)NANANANANA3.860.8617.320.02831
Nassir[20]96/12771/1271.8 (1.17, 2.43)NANANA805 ± 170942 ± 2162.441.434.170.224770.20717717.47 ± 4.319.26 ± 4.41
Pourmand et al[21]5.6 (3.68, 7.52)NANANANANANANANaNa0.10440513.5919.16
Pyrgidis et al[28]4.8 (3.22, 6.38)NANANANANANANANANa
Teng et al[22]21/2411/247.3 (5.22, 9.38)NANA0307 ± 94654 ± 3148.271.9435.340.042470.03915212.46 ± 8.8819.75 ± 5.93
Javid et al[23]NA7232
Pan et al[24]191/230142/2302 ± 13.6NA1673.041.964.690.4070790.37520419 ± 7.4121 ± 6.21
El hennawy et al[25]63/6839/688.79.373.3526.240.1203540.1109346.8 ± 12.955.5 ± 13
Mondal et al[26] NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA