Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Nephrol. Dec 25, 2024; 13(4): 95761
Published online Dec 25, 2024. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v13.i4.95761
Table 1 Criteria for diagnosis of diabetes
Tests
Results
Fasting plasma glucose (fasting is defined as no caloric intake for at least eight hours)1≥ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L)
Or, 2-hour plasma glucose during OGTT (the test should be performed as described by the World Health Organization, using a glucose load containing the equivalent of 75-g anhydrous glucose dissolved in water)1≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L)
Or, HbA1c (the test should be performed in a laboratory using a method that is NGSP certified and standardized to the DCCT assay)1≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol)
Or, in a patient with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L)
Table 2 Estimated glomerular filtration rate equations
Names
Equations
Cock-Croft Gault
(mL/min)
eGFR = [(140-age) × weight]/(72 × Scr) (× 0.85 if female)
MDRD (mL/min/1.73 m²) eGFR = 186 × (Scr)-1.154 × (age)-0.203 × (0.742 if female) × (1.210 if African American)
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine (mL/min/1.73 m²) FemaleScr ≤ 0.7eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.7)-0.241 × 0.9938age × 1.012
Scr > 0.7eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.7)-1.200 × 0.9938age × 1.012
MaleScr ≤ 0.9eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.9)-0.302 × 0.9938age
Scr > 0.9 eGFR = 142 × (Scr/0.9)-1.200 × 0.9938age
CKD-EPI 2012 cystatin C (mL/min/1.73 m²) FemaleScys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 133 × (Scys/0.8)– 0.499 × 0.996age × 0.932
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 133 × (Scys/0.8)– 1.328 × 0.996age × 0.932
MaleScys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 133 × (Scys/0.8)– 0.499 × 0.996age
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 133 × (Scys/0.8)– 1.328 × 0.996age
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine-cystatin C (mL/min/1.73 m²) FemaleScr ≤ 0.7Scys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.7)-0.219 × (Scys/0.8)-0.323 × 0.9961age × 0.963
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.7)-0.219 × (Scys/0.8)-0.778 × 0.9961age × 0.963
Scr > 0.7Scys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.7)-0.544 × (Scys/0.8)-0.323 × 0.9961age × 0.963
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.7)-0.544 × (Scys/0.8)-0.778 × 0.9961age × 0.963
MaleScr ≤ 0.9Scys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.9)-0.144 × (Scys/0.8)-0.323 × 0.9961age
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.9)-0.144 × (Scys/0.8)-0.778 × 0.9961age
Scr > 0.9Scys ≤ 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.9)-0.544 × (Scys/0.8)-0.323 × 0.9961age
Scys > 0.8eGFR = 135 × (Scr/0.9)-0.544 × (Scys/0.8)-0.778 × 0.9961age
Table 3 Chronic kidney disease stages
Terms
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Normal or high≥ 90
Mildly decreased60-89
Mildly to moderately decreased45-59
Moderately to severely decreased30-44
Severely decreased15-29
Kidney failure< 15
Table 4 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the study subjects
Characteristics
Type 2 diabetic
P value
Characteristics
Type 2 diabetic
P value
Yes (n = 47)
No (n = 46)
Yes (n = 47)
No (n = 46)
Gender n, (%)Male 15 (31.9)18 (39.1)0.47HbA1c (%)7.3 ± 1.75.8 ± 0.93< 0.011
Female 32 (68.1)28 (60.9)Glucose (mmol/L)7.2 ± 2.75.5 ± 0.6< 0.011
Average age (years)71 ± 1.071 ± 1.20.82Total cholesterol (mmol/L)5.6 ± 0.95.6 ± 1.20.8
Weight (kg)59.4 ± 13.457.3 ± 9.30.4Triglycerides (mmol/L)2.3 ± 0.92.1 ± 1.30.6
BMI (kg/m2)24.3 ± 4.423.0 ± 2.70.08HDL-C (mmol/L)1.1 ± 0.271.1 ± 0.30.8
SBP (mmHg)133 ± 14.2129.7 ± 10.60.2LDL-C (mmol/L)3.6 ± 0.93.6 ± 1.01
DBP (mmHg)82.2 ± 4.581.4 ± 5.00.4Uric acid (μmol/L)330 ± 75.6315 ± 68.40.3
Scr (µmol/L)84.9 ± 26.377.9 ± 20.10.15Scys (mg/L)1.3 ± 0.41.22 ± 0.30.3
ACR (mg/g)17.4 (3.9 – 8632.3)213.5 (4 – 252.8)20.11
Table 5 Estimated glomerular filtration rate values and its correlation with serum cystatin C concentration
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Type 2 diabetes
P value
Correlation between eGFR values and Scys
Yes (n = 47)
No (n = 46)
r
P1 value
Cockcroft-Gault 64.7 ± 22.567.3 ± 20.60.56-0.47< 0.01
MDRD 72 ± 0.1980 ± 0.170.06-0.59< 0.01
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine102.8 ± 32.8109.1 ± 30.90.34-0.59< 0.01
CKD-EPI 2012 cystatin C55.6 ± 17.158.7 ± 15.40.35-0.86< 0.01
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine-cystatin C66.8 ± 14.670.4 ± 13.80.23-0.91< 0.01
Table 6 The agreements between estimated glomerular filtration rate equations
Equations
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine-cystatin C (mL/min/1.73m2)
Kappa coefficients (P1 value)
< 60
≥ 60
Cockcroft-Gault (mL/min/1.73 m2)< 6019200.43 (P < 0.001)
≥ 60450
MDRD (mL/min/1.73 m2)< 601530.66 (P < 0.001)
≥ 60867
CKD-EPI 2021 creatinine (mL/min/1.73 m2)< 60900.49 (P < 0.001)
≥ 601470
CKD-EPI 2012 cystatin C (mL/min/1.73 m2)< 6019200.44 (P < 0.001)
≥ 60450
Table 7 Related factors that affect the estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in elderly diabetic patients
Characteristics (n, %)
eGFR decline
P value
Characteristics (n, %)
eGFR decline
P value
Yes (n = 14)
No (n = 33)
Yes (n = 14)
No (n = 33)
GenderMale 4 (26.7)11 (73.3)0.7BMINormal6 (28.6)15 (71.4)0.2
Female 10 (31.2)22 (68.8)Overweight, obese8 (30.8)18 (69.2)
HypertensionYes6 (35.3)11 (64.7)0.53Uric acidIncreased1 (10.0)9 (90.0)0.15
No 8 (26.7)22 (73.3)Normal13 (35.1)24 (64.9)
ACRIncreased5 (35.7)9 (27.3)0.6TriglyceridesIncreased9 (31.0)20 (69.0)0.24
Normal9 (64.3)24 (72.7)Normal5 (27.8)13 (72.2)
HDL-CDecreased9 (39.1)14 (60.9)0.18LDL-CIncreased11 (26.8)30 (73.2)0.26
Normal 5 (20.8)19 (79.2)Normal3 (50.0)3 (50.0)
The relationship of declined eGFR and the correlation of eGFR with glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and exercise (n = 47)
CharacteristicsDeclined eGFR eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
OR95%CIPa valuerPb value
Glucose (mmol/L)1.61.1-2.50.04-0.460.001
HbA1c (%)1.71.1-2.60.013-0.470.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)0.240.06-0.90.0290.3410.019
Exercise (regular, irregular)0.160.03-0.810.017N/AN/A
Multivariate logistic regression between glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, exercise and declined eGFR (n = 47)
CharacteristicsDeclined eGFR
βOR95%CIPc value
Glucose (mmol/L)-0.2030.8160.550-1.2120.315
HbA1c (%)-0.4560.6340.330-1.2170.171
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)1.1413.1301.000-9.7930.05
Exercise (regular, irregular)2.84417.1781.409-209.3690.026
Multiple linear regression between glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and eGFR values (n = 47)
CharacteristicseGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
βrr2Pd value
Glucose (mmol/L)-2.248-0.3660.130.026
HbA1c (%)-1.591-0.1620.020.332
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.5031.9493.790.058