Gadelkareem RA, Mohammed N. Unilateral hypoplastic kidney in adults: An experience of a tertiary-level urology center . World J Nephrol 2022; 11(1): 30-38 [PMID: 35117977 DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v11.i1.30]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Elgamaa Street, Assiut 71515, Egypt. dr.rabeagad@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Urology & Nephrology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Number of patients and abnormal findings (other than small-sized kidney) per imaging tool, n (%)
Imaging modality
Number of patients who had this imaging
Abnormal findings
n (%)
US
33 (100)
Stones
19 (57.6)
Cysts
3 (9.1)
Hydronephrosis
7 (21.2)
KUB
33 (100)
Stones
18 (54.6)
IVU
2 (6.1)
Hydronephrosis
1 (3)
MSCT
27 (81.8)
Stones
23 (69.7)
Cysts
3 (9.1)
Hydronephrosis
8 (24.2)
Table 3 Total and split renal functions represented by the glomerular filtration rate in patients who were evaluated by renal isotope scanning (n = 8), n (%)
Case No.
Age (yr)
Gender
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Indication for isotope scanning
Total
Right
Left
Case 1
25
Male
92.4
61.9 (67)
30.5 (33)
Kidney donation
Case 2
42
Female
83.2
53.4 (64.2)
29.8 (35.8)
Kidney donation
Case 3
47
Female
88.5
67.8 (76.6)
20.7 (23.4)
To verify decision
Case 4
45
Female
69.7
61.2 (87.8)
8.5 (12.2)
Patient request
Case 5
21
Female
86
16.8 (19.5)
69.2 (80.5)
Patient request
Case 6
37
Male
77.6
58.2 (75)
19.4 (25)
To verify decision
Case 7
28
Male
83.4
17.5 (21)
65.9 (79)
To verify decision
Case 8
26
Male
66.8
7.5 (11.2)
59.3 (88.8)
To verify decision
Table 4 Rates of complications that occurred in patients with unilateral hypoplastic kidney (n = 29/33), n (%)
Complication
Number of patients
Involvement/localization
Ipsilateral
Contralateral
Bilateral/systemic
Urolithiasis
23 (69.7)
12 (36.4)
3 (9.1)
8 (24.2)
Renal cysts
3 (9.1)
2 (6.1)
1 (3)
0 (0)
Hydronephrosis
8 (24.2)
3 (9.1)
4 (12.1)
1 (3)
Recurrent UTI
10 (30.3)
1 (3)
2 (6.1)
7 (21.2)
Hypertension
3 (9.1)
NA
NA
3 (9.1)
Septicemia
1 (3)
0 (0)
1 (3)
1 (3)
Table 5 Management approaches for patients with unilateral hypoplastic kidney (n = 33), n (%)
Total number of patients who received the treatment F1
9 (27.3)
For hypertension
2 (6.1)
For UTI
3 (9.1)
For stones
5 (15.2)
Hydronephrosis
1 (3)
For cysts
1 (3)
Shock wave lithotripsy
8 (24.2)
Ipsilateral
2 (6.1)
Contralateral
5 (15.2)
Bilateral
1 (3)
Endoscopic procedures
Ipsilateral ureteroscopy
3 (9.1)
Contralateral ureteroscopy
3 (9.1)
Contralateral JJ placement
5 (15.2)
Laparoscopic nephrectomy
5 (15.2)
For recurrent UTI
2 (6.1)
For hypertension
3 (9.1)
Open nephrectomy
1 (3)
For stones
1 (3)
Citation: Gadelkareem RA, Mohammed N. Unilateral hypoplastic kidney in adults: An experience of a tertiary-level urology center . World J Nephrol 2022; 11(1): 30-38