Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Nephrol. Jan 25, 2022; 11(1): 30-38
Published online Jan 25, 2022. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v11.i1.30
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients (n = 33), n (%)
Variable
Value
Age (yr)
Mean ± SD39.5 ± 11.2
Median (range)40 (19-73)
Gender
Male19 (57.6)
Female14 (42.4)
Main clinical presentations
Ipsilateral loin pain8 (24.2)
Contralateral loin pain4 (12.1)
Bilateral or vague abdominal pain5 (15.2)
UTI manifestations4 (12.1)
Stone passer ± LUTS or colic3 (9.1)
Anuria/oliguria4 (12.1)
Accidental discovery F15 (15.2)
Anatomical side
Right23 (69.7)
Left10 (30.3)
Laboratory investigations
Serum creatinine mean ± SD; median (range) (mg/dL)1.2 ± 0.68; 0.9 (0.66-3.6)
Positive for protein in urine5 (15.2)
Patients with WBCs > 10/HPF in urine F222 (66.7)
Patients with RBCs > 3/HPF in urine15 (45.5)
Table 2 Number of patients and abnormal findings (other than small-sized kidney) per imaging tool, n (%)
Imaging modality
Number of patients who had this imaging
Abnormal findings
n (%)
US33 (100)Stones19 (57.6)
Cysts3 (9.1)
Hydronephrosis7 (21.2)
KUB33 (100)Stones18 (54.6)
IVU2 (6.1)Hydronephrosis1 (3)
MSCT27 (81.8)Stones23 (69.7)
Cysts3 (9.1)
Hydronephrosis8 (24.2)
Table 3 Total and split renal functions represented by the glomerular filtration rate in patients who were evaluated by renal isotope scanning (n = 8), n (%)
Case No.
Age (yr)
Gender
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Indication for isotope scanning
Total
Right
Left
Case 125Male92.461.9 (67)30.5 (33)Kidney donation
Case 242Female83.253.4 (64.2)29.8 (35.8)Kidney donation
Case 347Female88.567.8 (76.6)20.7 (23.4)To verify decision
Case 445Female69.761.2 (87.8)8.5 (12.2)Patient request
Case 521Female8616.8 (19.5)69.2 (80.5)Patient request
Case 637Male77.658.2 (75)19.4 (25)To verify decision
Case 728Male83.417.5 (21)65.9 (79)To verify decision
Case 826Male66.87.5 (11.2)59.3 (88.8)To verify decision
Table 4 Rates of complications that occurred in patients with unilateral hypoplastic kidney (n = 29/33), n (%)
Complication
Number of patients
Involvement/localization
Ipsilateral
Contralateral
Bilateral/systemic
Urolithiasis23 (69.7)12 (36.4)3 (9.1)8 (24.2)
Renal cysts3 (9.1)2 (6.1)1 (3)0 (0)
Hydronephrosis8 (24.2)3 (9.1)4 (12.1)1 (3)
Recurrent UTI10 (30.3)1 (3)2 (6.1)7 (21.2)
Hypertension3 (9.1)NANA3 (9.1)
Septicemia1 (3)0 (0)1 (3)1 (3)
Table 5 Management approaches for patients with unilateral hypoplastic kidney (n = 33), n (%)
Approach of management
Category/variety
n (%)
Assurance only4 (12.1)
Conservative/symptomatic treatment F1Total number of patients who received the treatment F19 (27.3)
For hypertension2 (6.1)
For UTI3 (9.1)
For stones5 (15.2)
Hydronephrosis1 (3)
For cysts1 (3)
Shock wave lithotripsy8 (24.2)
Ipsilateral2 (6.1)
Contralateral5 (15.2)
Bilateral1 (3)
Endoscopic procedures
Ipsilateral ureteroscopy3 (9.1)
Contralateral ureteroscopy3 (9.1)
Contralateral JJ placement5 (15.2)
Laparoscopic nephrectomy5 (15.2)
For recurrent UTI2 (6.1)
For hypertension3 (9.1)
Open nephrectomy1 (3)
For stones1 (3)