Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach

doi:10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 4, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (14597)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

484

WORD

345

HTML

8770

Figures (1-1)

542

Tables (1-4)

259

Sum=10400

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

606

Download

1267

Sum=1873

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1093

Download

1231

Sum=2324

Feb 6, 2015 (publication date) through Dec 20, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (21)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Nephrology

ISSN

2220-6124

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Minireviews

World J Nephrol. Feb 6, 2015; 4(1): 111-117
Published online Feb 6, 2015. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Our proposed treatment algorithm for kidney stones. fURS: Flexible ureteroscopy; PNL: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SWL: Shock wave lithotripsy.

Citation: Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach. World J Nephrol 2015; 4(1): 111-117
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v4/i1/111.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v4.i1.111