Published online Mar 25, 2024. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v13.i1.90542
Peer-review started: December 7, 2023
First decision: December 31, 2023
Revised: January 19, 2024
Accepted: February 29, 2024
Article in press: February 29, 2024
Published online: March 25, 2024
Processing time: 106 Days and 0.7 Hours
Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) has evolved to become the fifth pillar of the conventional physical examination, and use of POCUS protocols have significantly decreased procedure complications and time to diagnose. However, lack of experience in POCUS by preceptors in medical schools and nephrology residency programs are significant barriers to implement a broader use. In rural and low-income areas POCUS may have a transformative effect on health care management.
Core Tip: Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) has become an important tool in patient care. POCUS protocols has reduced complications in invasive procedures and improved diagnostic times. In rural and low-income areas POCUS have an important role on health care management.
- Citation: Sabath E. Point of care ultrasonography as the new “Laennec Sthetoscope”. World J Nephrol 2024; 13(1): 90542
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6124/full/v13/i1/90542.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v13.i1.90542
Point of care ultrasonography (POCUS) it is defined as a focused ultrasound exami
As was elegantly described by Koratala et al[3] in his review about myths, POCUS emerges as a useful tool for any nephrologist, and helps to answer specific clinical questions such as “Does this patient with left side pain have kidney stones?” or “Does this patient with recently diagnosed abnormal creatinine levels have small kidneys?".
POCUS allows the physician to review and interpret images and make critical decisions at the point of care, and many studies have shown that POCUS protocols significantly reduced diagnostic time[4], decrease procedure complications[5], improves patient safety, increased success rates of invasive bedside procedures[6], and minimize delays in care such as time to obtain antibiotics or time to move into surgery[7].
One of the biggest barrier to the widespread use of POCUS has been the lack of adequate training curricula in undergraduate and specialty courses[8]. Koratala et al[3] describe that 73.8% of United States undergraduate medical schools have integrated POCUS into basic science courses; however, even in other developed countries this percentage is lower (in Canada and according to the 2014 census only 50% of the medical schools included it as part of their curricula[9]), and in developing nations the information is almost non-existent.
Even though there is a solid evidence that POCUS implementation improves the traditional examination techniques and that is very clear that POCUS is essential to the nephrology practice, still few nephrology programs in Latin-America (LA) and other regions introduce POCUS as curricular training[10]; the inexperience of preceptors in these courses is an important limitation in these countries[11]. Current training programs are heterogeneous without rigorous quality control; short-term courses are useful to initiate POCUS training but practice and learning curricula should span the entire nephrology residency[12].
Also, the unavailability of ultrasound machines (USM) still precludes its use in low-socioeconomic countries; in one study conducted in intensive care units from Sri Lanka, lack of USM availability delayed 80% of interventions and optimal management[13]. However, the introduction of low-cost and more portable ultrasound models in the health-market will surely diminish this shortage in the near future.
The percentage of nephrologist interested in learning POCUS is high (95% in a recent Brazilian-survey), although most of them think in POCUS as a help for central venous catheters placement and not as a guide to do volume assessment, lung evaluation, etc[14].
Lack of time was also considered as one of the most important barriers for POCUS implementation and learning in almost every country[15]; however some studies have shown that even short courses (i.e. a 16-h training course) covering topics associated with complications of kidney disease in lung, heart, etc. can be helpful to develop POCUS skills in clinical practice[12], but as mentioned before must be completed with further training.
POCUS is becoming a widely useful tool in low- and middle- income countries due to its portable nature, trainable interface and readily available data to guide clinical decision-making, and has been widely demonstrated its utility in rural and remote areas with no access to other diagnostic methods[16].
Studies performed in poorer regions of Mexico have shown that ultrasound changed the management plan in 30% of patients[17]. As expected, most of ultrasounds performed in rural and low-income areas are done as help in gynecologic-obstetric problems and is an important tool to provide adequate imaging in screening for placenta previa, fetal malposition, multiple gestations, ectopic pregnancy, etc[18]. This experience has been replicated in another low-income countries such as Uganda, Malawi, Tanzania[19], etc. As ultrasound machines become more portable and affordable, coupled with increasing capacity to transmit digital images for remote review, the introduction of POCUS may have a transformative effect on health care in resource-limited settings.
Another barrier in many countries (i.e. LA countries) is the lack of non-english literature and publications: a recent PUBMED search found less than 30 papers in Spanish about POCUS and less than 10 searching with the terms “POCUS”, “riñón”, “nefrologia”[20].
Many efforts has to be done to increase POCUS training in residency programs outside of the United States; availability of pocket ultrasound is not a limitation as they are of good quality and not so expensive. We have to take out the fear that POCUS is going to limit our clinical abilities and to impair the doctor-patient relationship, we have to think in POCUS as the new “Laennec stethoscope”[21] that is going to help us to make more accurate diagnosis and to improve the patient care.
Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Medicine, general and internal
Country/Territory of origin: Mexico
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Munasinghe B, Sri Lanka S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao S
1. | Díaz-Gómez JL, Mayo PH, Koenig SJ. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1593-1602. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 180] [Article Influence: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Badejoko SO, Nso N, Buhari C, Amr O, Erwin JP 3rd. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Overview and Curriculum Implementation in Internal Medicine Residency Training Programs in the United States. Cureus. 2023;15:e42997. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Koratala A, Kazory A. Seeing through the myths: Practical aspects of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound in nephrology. World J Nephrol. 2023;12:112-119. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Radonjić T, Popović M, Zdravković M, Jovanović I, Popadić V, Crnokrak B, Klašnja S, Mandić O, Dukić M, Branković M. Point-of-Care Abdominal Ultrasonography (POCUS) on the Way to the Right and Rapid Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care. 2017;21:225. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 182] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 217] [Article Influence: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Hsieh A, Baker MB, Phalen JM, Mejias-Garcia J, Hsieh A, Canelli R. Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Safety Considerations for Creating Guidelines. J Intensive Care Med. 2022;37:1146-1151. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Johnson GGRJ, Kirkpatrick AW, Gillman LM. Ultrasound in the surgical ICU: uses, abuses, and pitfalls. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25:675-687. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Kern J, Scarpulla M, Finch C, Martini W, Bolch CA, Al-Nakkash L. The assessment of point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) in acute care settings is benefitted by early medical school integration and fellowship training. J Osteopath Med. 2023;123:65-72. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Ma IWY, Steinmetz P, Weerdenburg K, Woo MY, Olszynski P, Heslop CL, Miller S, Sheppard G, Daniels V, Desy J, Valois M, Devine L, Curtis H, Romano MJ, Martel P, Jelic T, Topping C, Thompson D, Power B, Profetto J, Tonseth P. The Canadian Medical Student Ultrasound Curriculum: A Statement From the Canadian Ultrasound Consensus for Undergraduate Medical Education Group. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39:1279-1287. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Plan Único de Especializaciones Médicas en Nefrología. Facultad de Medicina. UNAM. Accessed December 03, 2023. Available from: http://www.sidep.fmposgrado.unam.mx:8080/NoBorrar/recursos/programas/nefrologia.pdf. [Cited in This Article: ] |
11. | Wong J, Montague S, Wallace P, Negishi K, Liteplo A, Ringrose J, Dversdal R, Buchanan B, Desy J, Ma IWY. Barriers to learning and using point-of-care ultrasound: a survey of practicing internists in six North American institutions. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:19. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52] [Article Influence: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Nunes AA, Pazeli Júnior JM, Rodrigues AT, Tollendal AL, Ezequiel Oda S, Colugnati FA, Bastos MG. Development of skills to utilize point-of-care ultrasonography in nephrology practice. J Bras Nefrol. 2016;38:209-214. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Munasinghe BH, Fernando UPM, Srisothinathan N, Subramaniam N, Jayamanne BDW, Arulmoli J. Critical care ultrasonography as a decision support and therapeutic assist tool in the intensive care unit: a single center retrospective survey in a district general hospital, Sri Lanka. JPGIM. 2021;8:E162 1-12. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] |
14. | Bastos MG, Vieira AL, Nascimento MMD, Barros E, Pazeli JM Jr, Kirsztajn GM. Point-of-care ultrasonography in nephrology: a cross-sectional national survey among Brazilian nephrologists. J Bras Nefrol. 2021;43:68-73. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Wang A, McCabe M, Gow-Lee E, James S, Austin B, Wailes D, Dinh V, Ramsingh D. Evaluation of a survey for acute care programme directors on the utilisation of point-of-care ultrasound. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98:694-699. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Marín-Gomez FX, Mendioroz Peña J, Canal Casals V, Romero Mendez M, Darnés Surroca A, Nieto Maclino A, Vidal-Alaball J. Environmental and Patient Impact of Applying a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Model in Primary Care: Rural vs. Urban Centres. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Rominger AH, Gomez GAA, Elliott P. The implementation of a longitudinal POCUS curriculum for physicians working at rural outpatient clinics in Chiapas, Mexico. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10:19. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Wanjiku GW, Bell G, Wachira B. Assessing a novel point-of-care ultrasound training program for rural healthcare providers in Kenya. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:607. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Shokoohi H, Raymond A, Fleming K, Scott J, Kerry V, Haile-Mariam T, Sayeed S, Boniface KS. Assessment of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training for Clinical Educators in Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45:1351-1357. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | National Library of Medicine. PUBMED. Accessed December 03, 2023. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=pocus+&filter=lang.spanish&sort=date. [Cited in This Article: ] |
21. | Ross DW, Moses AA, Niyyar VD. Point-of-care ultrasonography in nephrology comes of age. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15:2220-2227. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |