Published online Mar 6, 2016. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.158
Peer-review started: June 15, 2015
First decision: July 10, 2015
Revised: November 11, 2015
Accepted: January 27, 2016
Article in press: January 29, 2016
Published online: March 6, 2016
Processing time: 263 Days and 9 Hours
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is relatively rare compared to urothelial carcinoma of the lower tract, comprising only 5%-10% of all urothelial cancers. Although both entities share histologic properties, UTUC tends to be more invasive at diagnosis and portend a worse prognosis, with a 5 year overall mortality of 23%. To date, the gold standard management of UTUC has been radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with nephron sparing techniques reserved for solitary kidneys or cases where the patient could not tolerate radical surgery. Limited data from these series, as well as select series where nephron-sparing endoscopic management has been offered to a broader patient base, suggest that minimally invasive, nephron sparing techniques can offer comparable oncologic and survival outcomes to RNU in appropriately selected patients. We review the current literature on the topic and discuss long term outcomes and sequelae of the gold standard treatment, RNU. We also discuss the oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive, endoscopic management of UTUC. Our goal is to provide the reader a comprehensive overview of the current state of the field in order to inform and guide their treatment decisions.
Core tip: In the appropriate patient population, minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma provides comparable oncologic and survival outcomes to the gold standard radical nephroureterectomy.