Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Virology. Aug 12, 2015; 4(3): 156-168
Published online Aug 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i3.156
Published online Aug 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i3.156
Vaccine type | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages | Immunogenicity | Examples |
Live attenuated vaccines | Living weakened microbes that generally show reduced pathogenicity | Induce a protective immune response by activating both B and T cell responses; induce long-term immunity; do not require adjuvants; unable to spread and cause infection | They can revert towards virulent forms or can be insufficiently attenuated for immunosuppressed individuals with risk of infection; difficult to produce in a scalable setting; heat-labile; quality and safety requirements | Humoral and cytotoxic immune responses | Smallpox; yellow fever; rabies; measles; mumps; rubella; typhoid; influenza; rotavirus; varicella |
Killed/inactivated vaccines | Bacteria (killed vaccines) or viruses (inactivated vaccines) inactivated by chemical orphysical treatments | Due to the absence of living pathogens they do not revert towards virulent forms and can be used in immunodeficient hosts; not heat-labile | Repeated booster shots and adjuvants (with subsequent local reactions at the vaccine site) are required to optimally trigger the adaptive immune system and generate long-term immunity; do not give rise to cytotoxic T cells; poor induction of mucosal immunity; difficult to produce in a scalable setting; quality and safety requirements | Humoral immunity | Diphtheria; tetanus; pertussis; haemophilus influenzae type b; poliomyelitis; rabies; meningitidis; Japanese encephalitis; cholera; hepatitis A; hepatitis B |
Toxoids vaccines | Purified exotoxins chemically inactivated into toxoids that retain the ability to induce toxin-neutralizing antibodies | Safe and stable. There is no possibility of reversion to pathogenicity or spread of live microbe to other animals | Poorly immunogenic; need adjuvants and large amounts or multiple doses to ensure efficient activation of the adaptive immune response and generation of long-last immunity; local reactions at vaccine site | B cell activation (T cell dependent) | Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis toxoids; acellular pertussis vaccines; anthrax secreted proteins |
Subunit/polysaccharide vaccines | Antigenic components of pathogens: partly or fully purified protein antigens or capsular polysaccharides | Can be chemically linked to protein carrier | Variable degree of immunogenicity; need adjuvants (and often multiple doses); frequent local reactions at the injection site | T-dependent and/or T-independent immune responses | Hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzaetype b; influenza; meningococcus, pneumococcus, and Haemophilus influenzae type B polysaccharides |
Plasmid DNA | Genetically engineered vectors expressing antigens of interest | Inability to revert to pathogenic forms; activation of innate and adaptive immune responses; highly stable; easy storage and transport; large-scale production; optimization of plasmids and transcript is possible | Not-useful for non-protein immunogens; lower immunogenicity in human compared to mice; low transfection efficiency | Activation of antigen-specific B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells | Infectioushaematopoieticnecrosis virus; West Nile virus; melanoma; growth hormonereleasing hormone |
Vectored vaccines | Live recombinant viral and bacterial vectors expressing heterologous antigens | Ability to induce specific humoral and cellular immune responses; high transduction efficiency; highly effective in dividing and non-dividing cells; production of high levels of antigens inside target cells; sustained gene expression; vector itself can provide an adjuvant effect | High expense; toxic side effects; limits on transgene size; potential for insertional mutagenesis; anti-vector immunity; difficult to manufacture and store | B cell, CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ T cell activation | Adenovirus; adeno-associated virus; retrovirus; lentivirus; Herpes simplex virus; Salmonella |
Nanoparticles | Nano-scale size materials made of polymers, proteins or lipids used as carrier systems (e.g., PLGA, liposomes, virosomes, Virus-like particles) | Ability to induce humoral and cellular immune responses; increased antigen uptake, processing and presentation; controlled/sustained release of vaccine target; depot effect; targeted delivery; adjuvanticity; high encapsulation; improved cargo bioavailability; transport efficiency; | Challenges in vaccine formulation, production, stabilization. Immunotoxicity can occur | B-cell, CD4+ and cytotoxic T-cell responses | Hepatitis A virus; influenza; human papilloma virus; hepatitis B virus; hepatitis E virus |
enhanced permeability; biodegradability and biocompatibility |
E2 construct | Description | Route | Immune response | Ref. |
Gag(p17)-E2 | HIV-1 Gag p17 matrix protein | sc | Mice immunized with Gag(p17)-E2 mounted a strong and sustained Ab response; the isotype of induced Abs was biased toward IgG1; CD8+ T cells primed with E2 particles were able to exert lytic activity and to produce IFN-γ | [65] |
BS1-E2 | Mimotope 1 from HIV-1 bridging sheet domain (BS) | IM1/sc1 | The E2-BS1 fusion peptide showed good antigenic results; a moderate neutralizing antibody response was found against two HIV-1 clade B and one clade C primary isolates | [67] |
Env(V3)-E2 | HIV-1 SF162 Env V3 loop peptide 291-336 from gp120 (HXB2 numbering) | Env-E2: IM1;pDNA2: ID1 | Env(V3)-E2 induced potent binding Ab and T-cell responses in mice, as well as autologous NAbs in rabbits, when co-immunized with pDNA; co-immunization with pDNA and E2 multimers generated potent immune responses after only two immunizations | [19] |
Env(MPER)-E2 | HIV-1 SF162 Env MPER peptide 649-689 from gp41 (HXB2 numbering) | Env-E2: IM1;pDNA23: ID1 | MPER (membrane proximal external region) displayed on E2 focused Ab responses toward conserved region of HIV-1 Envelope when co-administered with pDNA lacking hypervariable loop regions | [66] |
(1-11)-E2 | Peptide 1-11 of beta-amyloid | sc | (1-11)E2 vaccine induced fast-rising, robust and persistent Ab responses to beta-amyloid; the Ab response was characterized by a marked prevalence of IgG1 over the IgG2a isotype | [68,69] |
- Citation: Trovato M, Berardinis PD. Novel antigen delivery systems. World J Virology 2015; 4(3): 156-168
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v4/i3/156.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v4.i3.156