Vilibic-Cavlek T, Bogdanic M, Savic V, Hruskar Z, Barbic L, Stevanovic V, Antolasic L, Milasincic L, Sabadi D, Miletic G, Coric I, Mrzljak A, Listes E, Savini G. Diagnosis of West Nile virus infections: Evaluation of different laboratory methods. World J Virol 2024; 13(4): 95986 [PMID: 39722752 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v13.i4.95986]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Virology, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb 10000, Zagreb 10000, Croatia. tatjana.vilibic-cavlek@hzjz.hr
Research Domain of This Article
Virology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction positive detection rates in cerebrospinal fluid and urine samples, n (%)
Days after symptoms onset
WNV RT-PCR CSF
WNV RT-PCR Urine
Tested
Positive
Tested
Positive
≤ 7
22 (35.5)
8 (36.4)
17 (30.9)
5 (29.4)
8–14
32 (51.6)
10 (31.2)
30 (54.6)
20 (66.6)
≥ 15
8 (12.9)
2 (25.0)
8 (14.5)
5 (62.5)
Total
62 (100)
20 (32.2)
55 (100)
30 (54.4)
Table 4 Positive detection rate of West Nile virus antibodies in serum samples according to sampling time, n (%)
Days after symptoms onset
Tested
WNV IgM antibodies
WNV IgG antibodies
Positive
Borderline
Positive
Borderline
≤ 7
32 (33.7)
27 (84.3)
0 (0)
3 (9.3)
2 (6.2)
8 – 14
38 (40.0)
38 (100)
0 (0)
27 (71.1)
5 (13.1)
≥ 15
25 (26.3)
25 (100)
0 (0)
25 (100)
0 (0)
Total
95 (100)
90 (94.7)
0 (0)
55 (57.8)
7 (7.3)
Table 5 Positive detection rate of West Nile virus antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid samples according to sampling time, n (%)
WNV IgM antibodies
WNV IgG antibodies
Days after symptoms onset
Tested
Positive
Borderline
Positive
Borderline
≤ 7
32 (51.6)
20 (62.5)
1 (3.1)
9 (28.1)
2 (6.2)
8–14
23 (37.1)
17 (73.9)
0 (0)
6 (26.1)
1 (4.3)
≥ 15
7 (11.3)
7 (100)
0 (0)
4 (57.1)
0 (0)
Total
62 (100)
44 (70.9)
1 (1.6)
19 (30.6)
3 (4.8)
Table 6 Immunoglobulin G avidity in asymptomatic West Nile virus seropositive individuals
Serology result
IgG avidity index
Low
Borderline
High
IgM/IgG positive, n = 10
1 (10.0)
1 (10.0)
8 (80.0)
IgM negative/IgG positive, n = 12
1 (8.3)
0 (0)
11 (91.7)
Total, n = 22
2 (9.1)
1 (4.5)
19 (84.6)
Citation: Vilibic-Cavlek T, Bogdanic M, Savic V, Hruskar Z, Barbic L, Stevanovic V, Antolasic L, Milasincic L, Sabadi D, Miletic G, Coric I, Mrzljak A, Listes E, Savini G. Diagnosis of West Nile virus infections: Evaluation of different laboratory methods. World J Virol 2024; 13(4): 95986