Review
Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co. , Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Virol . Feb 12, 2012; 1(1): 31-43
Published online Feb 12, 2012. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v1.i1.31
Table 1 Types of latency in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases
Type 0 latency (EBERs, BARTs) AIDS-related plasmablastic lymphoma Type I latency (EBNA1, LMP2, EBERs, BARTs) (BamHI A rightward fragments) Burkitt’s lymphoma Type II latency (EBNA1, LMP1, LMP2, EBERs , BARTs ) Hodgkin’s lymphoma, AIDS-related Burkitt’s lymphoma or primary effusion lymphoma Peripheral T cell lymphoma NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (plus BARF1) Gastric adenocarcinoma (plus BARF1) Type III latency (EBNA1, -2, -3A, -3B, -3C; LMP1, LMP2, EBERs , BARTs ) Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder AIDS-related immunoblastic or brain lymphoma Infectious mononucleosis Chronic active EBV infection Lymphoblastoid cell lines in vitro X-linked lymphoproliferative disease
Table 2 Interpretation of Epstein-Barr virus serological profiles in immunocompetent patients
Anti-EBV antibodies Interpretation VCA IgM VCA IgG EBNA-1 IgG Negative Negative Negative No immunity Positive Negative Negative Acute infection or non-specificity1 Positive Positive Negative Acute infection Negative Positive Positive Past infection Negative Positive Negative Acute or past infection1 Positive Positive Positive Late primary infection or reactivation1 Negative Negative Positive Past infection or non-specificity1
Table 3 Serological profiles in Epstein-Barr virus reactivation and some Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases
Diseases VCA IgM VCA IgG VCA IgA EA (D) IgG EA (R) IgG EA IgA EBNA1 IgG Choronic active infection +/- ++ +/- + ++ - +/- Burkitt’s lymphoma - ++ - +/- ++ - + Nasopharingeal carcinoma - ++ + ++ +/- + + Hodgkin’s lymphoma - ++ - + - - + Reactivation +/- ++ +/- + +/- +/- +/-
Table 4 Interpretation of IgG avidity test with immunoblotting
IgG IgG avidity Interpretation Negative Not observed No infection Positive BZLF1, p138, p54 Low-high avidity for BZLF1 and/or p138 and/or p54 Acute infection Positive p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 Low avidity for p23 Acute infection Positive p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 High avidity for p23 Recent infection Positive p18, p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 Low-intermediate avidity for p18 and p23 Recent infection Positive EBNA-1, p18, p23, BZLF1, p138, p54 Low-high avidity for EBNA-1 and/or p18, and possible high avidity for p23 Past infection
Table 5 Additional tests in the case of an isolated viral capsid antigen IgG pattern
Tests Advantages Disadvantages EBV IgG immunoblotting Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection Individual antibody production; expensive IgG avidity Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection Individual maturation. Not useful in newborns Molecular biology Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection Uncorrected conservation of blood sample, presence of nucleasis; expensive; organisational problems Heterophile antibodies Useful in distinguishing acute from past infection if positive; inexpensive and simple Not very sensitive (especially in children) Anti-EA(D) IgG Of some use in distinguishing acute from past infection; costs the same as a screening test Not useful in at least 10% of cases
Table 6 Additional tests in the case of a simultaneous Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 IgG, viral capsid antigen IgG and IgM positive pattern
Tests Advantages Disadvantages EBV IgM immunoblotting Useful only in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive HCMV IgM Parvovirus IgM Useful in verifying the specificity of EBV IgM Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation EBV IgG immunoblotting Only useful in verifying the specificity of EBNA-1 IgG Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation; expensive IgG avidity Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from reactivation Individual maturation Molecular biology Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up Difficult to distinguish late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample; expensive; organisational problems Heterophile antibodies Useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) reactivation when positive; inexpensive and simple Not very sensitive (especially in children) Anti-EA(D) IgG Useful for EBV reactivation follow-up Not useful in distinguishing late primary infection (transient) from reactivation in a single sample CLIA for EBV antibodies with differential cut-off values Useful in distinguishing primary infection (transient) from past infection; can be used for screening Requires further study