Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2017; 7(3): 203-212
Published online Jun 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i3.203
Table 1 Summary of the descriptive statistics for donor (d) and the recipient (r) that form the study donor after cardiac death cohort from which the donor after cardiac death risk index score was developed
DCD donor and recipient variablesAll (n = 261)
DonordAge (yr)46.1 ± 17.9
dBMI26 ± 4.9
ITU Stay (d)3.9 ± 5.8
COD (CVA: Other: HBI: Trauma)52.5:13.8:16.9:16.9
dSodium (mmol/L)144.51 ± 11.8
dBilirubin (μmol/L)9.81 ± 6.88
Split/reduced (%)2.30%
WIT (min)16.7 ± 9.8
dHepT (min)24.3 ± 10.6
Liver Weight (g)1518.28 ± 397.507
CIT (min)431 ± 118
RecipientrAge (yr)49.45 ± 15.36
rGender70.1%M/39.9%F
rBMI25.9 ± 4.7
ALF (%)1.50%
rBilirubin (mmol/L)89.36 ± 116.38
rINR1.89 ± 1.88
MELD14.8 ± 6.4
Location (inpatient/home)20.3%/79.6%
Prior abdominal surgery (yr)13.40%
reTPL (yr)5.70%
Indication for TPLLow68 (26%)
Standard176 (67.5%)
High17 (6.5%)
Table 2 Point allocation system for the donor after cardiac death risk index score
Donor/recipient predictor variablesHR (CI)Points
Primary indication for transplant
Low (P = 0.07)
Standard (P = 0.05)2 (1-4.04)2
High (P = 0.04)2.83 (1.04-7.24)3
reTPL (P = 0.26)1.87 (0.63-5.58)2
MELD > 25 (P = 0.04)2.75 (1.04-7.24)3
CIT > 10 h (P = 0.6)1.37 (0.4-4.04)1
WIT > 25 min (P = 0.4)1.48 (0.6-3.63)1
dHepT
40-60 min (P = 0.5)1.36 (0.53-3.53)1
> 60 min (P = 0.05)4.4 (1.02-19.04)4
Table 3 Internal validation of the donor after cardiac death risk index in predicting donor after cardiac death graft survival
DCD Graft Survival (mo)DCD-RI class
DCD-RI1, low (n = 10/27%)DCD-RI 2-4, standard (n = 8/21.6%)DCD-RI5, high (n = 19/51.4%)
3
Actual10092.675
Predicted96 (100-83.8)90 (100-76.8)80 (96.2-63.8)
6
Actual10085.275
Predicted95 (100-83.7)90 (100-83.8)75 (91.2-58.8)
12
Actual10077.875
Predicted93 (100-76.8)87 (100-70.8)40 (56.2-23.8)
60
Actual1006350
Predicted86 (100-83.8)78 (94.2-61.8)34 (50.2-17.8)