Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Transplant. Feb 24, 2017; 7(1): 70-80
Published online Feb 24, 2017. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i1.70
Table 1 Study characteristics
AuthorYearCountryCenterTimeNrIndication/diagnosis
Acuity
CFIPFIPAHCOPDOther
Couetil1997FranceParis1993-199473121-Not reported
Espinosa2010SpainReina Sofia2003-20096-----2 ICU,
2 Hosp,
2 Outpatient
Deuse2011GermanyHamburg2009-20127125---1 ECMO
Marasco2012AustraliaAlfred1990-201227165-412Not reported
Inci2012SwissZurich2000-201223108-323 ECMO, 1 MV,
Shigemura2013United StatesUPMC2010-2012351417--147 ECMO, 9 MV, LAS 72-94
Mitilian2013FranceFoch1988-201250357-352 ECMO
Aigner2014AustriaVienna2001-2012138148468162027 MV, 18 ECMO
Stanzi2014BelgiumLeuven2005-201288----All outpatients
Table 2 Size matching parameters and characteristics
CenterSize matching parameterpTLC donor (full)pTLC donor (lobar)pTLC recipientpTLCratio (full)pTLCratio (lobar)
ParispTLCratio6.91 ± 0.73.11 ± 0.34.28 ± 1.11.69 ± 0.40.76 ± 0.5
Reina SofiaNot reportedNot providedNot providedNot providedNot providedNot provided
Hamburg1pTLCratio6.96 ± 1.23.64 ± 0.75.27 ± 1.01.35 ± 0.30.69 ± 0.1
Alfred1pTLCratio, CXR6.82 ± 1.24.81 ± 1.15.12 ± 1.41.44 ± 0.50.94 ± 0.3
Zurich1Visual inspection, height7.21 ± 0.84.45 ± 0.75.04 ± 0.91.48 ± 0.40.90 ± 0.2
UPMC1Height, CXR, visual inspection6.28 ± 0.73.76 ± 0.75.22 ± 0.81.22 ± 0.90.73 ± 0.5
FochpTLCratio, visual inspectionNot providedNot providedNot provided1.65Not provided
Vienna1pTLCratio, visual inspection6.19 ± 1.13.80 ± 0.95.45 ± 1.01.15 ± 0.20.70 ± 0.1
Leuven1Visual inspection, height6.70 ± 1.24.11 ± 0.34.42 ± 0.41.52 ± 0.40.93 ± 0.3
Table 3 Outcomes of deceased donor lobar lung transplantation compared to conventional lung transplant within the same center
CenterComparisonGroup with CLTx (number, diagnosis)PGD (grade)PostOP-ECMOICU LOS (d)Hospital LOS(d)Survival 1 yearSurvival 5 years
ParisNoNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedddLLTx: 86%Not reported
Reina SofiaYes (149 - mixed)1Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedddLLTx: 50%, CLTx: 72%1Not reported
HamburgYes (28 - mixed)4Not reportedNot reportedNot reportedddLLTx: 85%, CLTx: 72%4Not reported
AlfredYes (329 - mixed)ddLLTx: 56% ≥ PGD (2)LLT: 12; CLTx: 4ddLLTx: 30 CLTx: 21ddLLTx: 81%, CLTx: 84% (P = 0.115)ddLLTx: 52%5, CLTx: 37.5%5 (P = 0.115)
ZurichYes (219 - mixed)ddLLTx: 13% PGD (not spec.)Not reportedNot reportedddLLTx: 82%; CLTx: 88% (P = 0.56)ddLLTx: 64%; CLTx: 69% (P = 0.56)
UPMCYes (691 - mixed)2, Yes (65 - high LAS)3ddLLTx: 36% ECMONot reportedNot reportedddLLTx: 76%; CLTx: 83%1; (high LAS): 72%2Not reported
FochYes (445 - mixed)ddLLTx: 54% ≥ PGD (1) 20% ECMOddLLTx: 17ddLLTx: 43ddLLTx: 60%, CLTx: 78% (NS)ddLLTx: 46%, CLTx: 51% (NS)
ViennaYes (778 - mixed)ddLLTx: 44% ≥ PGD1 32% ECMOddLLTx: 17; CLTx: 6ddLLTx: 33.5 CLTx: 22ddLLTx: 65.1; CLTx: 84.8% (P < 0.001)ddLLTx: 54.9% CLTx: 69.9% (P < 0.001)
LeuvenYes (66 - all CF)ddLLTx: 25% PGD (3) at 48 h vs CLTx: 9%ddLLTx: 12 CLTx: 5ddLLTx: 37 CLTx: 24ddLLTx: 100%; CLTx: 88.4% (NS)Not reported
Table 4 Post-transplant FEV1 outcomes of deceased donor lobar Lung transplantation
Center (Nr of ddLLTx)Comparison group (Nr)FEV1 (%) 3-6 moPeak FEV1 (%)Correlation to pTLCratio
Paris (7)No6 mo: 62%81%Not reported
Reina Sofia (6)NoNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Hamburg (3)NoNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Alfred (23)No6 mo: 52.6%Not reportedYes FEV1(%) at 3 mo correlates with pTLCratioLobar (r = 0.549, P = 0.028)
Zurich (23)No6 mo: 75.3%76.80%Yes FEV1(%) at 3 mo correlates with pTLCratioLobar (r = 0.485, P = 0.04)
UPMC (25)NoNot reported85.20%Not reported
Foch (50)No6 mo: 61.1%67.30%
ViennaNoNot reportedNot reportedNot reported
Leuven (6)Yes CLTx (66)3 mo: ddLLTx: 64.5% CLTx: 76%ddLLTx: 80.5 CLTx: 99%Not reported