González F, Valjalo R. Combining cytochrome P-450 3A4 modulators and cyclosporine or everolimus in transplantation is successful. World J Transplant 2015; 5(4): 338-347 [PMID: 26722662 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.338]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Fernando González, MD, MBA, Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Hospital del Salvador, Avenida Salvador 364, Providencia, Santiago 7500922, Chile. fgonzalf@uc.cl
Research Domain of This Article
Transplantation
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2015; 5(4): 338-347 Published online Dec 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.338
Table 1 Characteristics of kidney donors and recipients
Everolimus (n = 59)
Azathioprine/MMF (n = 114)
P value
Donor
Age (yr)
38.4 ± 13.7
44.1 ± 13.0
< 0.01
Male gender
30 (51%)
65 (57%)
0.44
Living
15 (25%)
14 (12%)
0.03
Non-living
44 (75%)
100 (88%)
0.03
Extended criteria donor
5 (9%)
20 (18%)
0.11
Stroke as donor's cause of death
10 (23%)
28 (28%)
0.51
Hypertension
3 (5%)
22 (19%)
0.01
Type 2 diabetes
0 (0%)
4 (4%)
0.15
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)
0.83 ± 0.26
0.90 ± 0.36
0.19
Cold ischemia time (h)
18.9 ± 5.4
20.1 ± 7.1
0.33
Warm ischemia time (min)
37.3 ± 9.25
41.3 ± 11.2
0.02
Recipient
Age (yr)
43.1 ± 12.5
45.0 ± 12.1
0.35
Male gender
32 (54%)
79 (69%)
0.05
List waiting time (mo)
27.9 ± 22.7
30.4 ± 28.3
0.57
Previous kidney transplant
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total time in dialysis (mo)
49.0 ± 26.5
58.4 ± 33.6
0.57
PRA (%)
3.0 ± 4.3
3.8 ± 5.2
0.35
HLA-mismatch
2.9 ± 1.4
2.8 ± 1.2
0.68
Double kidney transplant
1 (2%)
5 (4%)
0.36
Hypertension
42 (71%)
79 (69%)
0.80
Type 2 diabetes
0 (0%)
7 (6%)
0.10
Coronary artery disease
1 (2%)
1 (1%)
0.63
IgG CMV (+)
56 (97%)
98 (88%)
0.06
Immunosuppressive treatment
Induction
0 (0%)
1 (1%)
0.47
Cyclosporine
59 (100%)
114 (100%)
Azathioprine
59 (100%)
111 (97%)
0.21
Mycophenolate mofetyl
0 (0%)
3 (3%)
0.21
Delayed graft function
3 (5%)
65 (57%)
< 0.01
Table 2 Follow up clinical findings and complications n (%)
Everolimus (n = 59)
Azathioprine/MMF (n = 114)
P value
Surgical complication
11 (19)
25 (22)
0.61
Vascular complication
2 (3)
10 (9)
0.22
First year acute rejection episode
6 (10)
25 (22)
0.06
Acute rejection episode during entire follow up period
12 (20)
41 (36)
0.04
Cyclosporine toxicity
8 (14)
22 (19)
0.35
New onset diabetes after transplant
3 (5)
8 (7)
0.75
CMV disease
0 (0)
6 (5.3)
0.10
BK virus nephropathy
1 (2)
5 (4)
0.67
New onset neoplasia
2 (3)
6 (5)
0.72
Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative disease
1 (2)
2 (2)
0.98
Hospitalizations/yr
0.50 ± 0.72
0.62 ± 0.78
0.32
Leucopenia
12 (20)
58 (51)
< 0.01
Thrombocytopenia
29 (49)
73 (64)
0.06
Pneumonia
6 (10)
25 (22)
0.06
Urinary tract infection
27 (46)
46 (40)
0.49
Table 3 Graft survival uncensored by recipient death with a functioning graft at different periods after kidney transplant
Time
Everolimus (n = 59)
Azathioprine/MMF (n = 114)
Year 1
98%
97%
Year 2
98%
94%
Year 3
96%
93%
Year 4
94%
88%
Year 5
94%
86%
Year 6
91%
83%
Table 4 Graft survival censored by recipient death with a functioning graft at different periods after kidney transplant
Time
Everolimus (n = 59)
Azathioprine/MMF (n = 114)
Year 1
100%
97%
Year 2
100%
94%
Year 3
98%
93%
Year 4
96%
88%
Year 5
96%
88%
Year 6
93%
83%
Citation: González F, Valjalo R. Combining cytochrome P-450 3A4 modulators and cyclosporine or everolimus in transplantation is successful. World J Transplant 2015; 5(4): 338-347