Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2015; 5(4): 310-319
Published online Dec 24, 2015. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.310
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population and immunosuppression before conversion to everolimus (n = 222)
n (%)Mean ± SD
Recipient age (yr)-53 ± 10.5
Sex
Male189 (85%)-
Female33 (15%)-
Mean time from transplant to conversion (yr)-8.1 ± 4.5
Type of transplant
First transplant215 (96.7%)-
Re-transplant6 (2.8%)-
Multiorgan transplant1 (0.4%)-
Reasons for transplanta
Ischaemic myocardiopathy114 (51%)-
Dilated myocardiopathy74 (33%)-
Valve disease14 (6%)-
Othersb16 (7%)-
Donor age (yr)-32.2 ± 12.7
Donor positive for CMV serologyd106 (48%)-
Recipient positive for CMV serologye155 (70%)-
Pre-transplant risk factorsc139 (63%)-
Arterial hypertension55 (25%)-
Diabetes36 (16%)-
Renal failure4 (2%)-
Osteoporosis3 (1%)-
Hypercholesterolaemia29 (13%)-
Dyslipidaemia29 (13%)-
Smoking23 (10%)-
Baseline immunosuppression
CNI210 (95%)-
CsA152 (72%)-
Dose, mg/d-142.3 ± 51.6
Blood levels, ng/mL-126.1 ± 50.9
Tacrolimus58 (28%)-
Dose, mg/d-2.9 ± 1.8
Blood levels, ng/mL-8.3 ± 4.0
Antimetabolite189 (85%)-
MMF143 (76%)-
Dose, mg/d-1.446.1 ± 499.0
Blood levels, ng/mL-2.9 ± 1.7
MFS8 (4%)-
Dose, mg/d-742.5 ± 413.1
Blood levels, ng/mL-3.8 ± 1.7
Azathioprine38 (20%)-
Dose, mg/d-84.9 ± 46.5
Blood levels, ng/mL--
Corticosteroids154 (69%)-
Dose, mg/d-5.2 ± 4.2
SRL21 (9%)-
Dose, mg/d-5.8 ± 2.5
Table 2 Reasons for conversion to everolimus
Reason for conversionPercentage95%CI
Nephrotoxicity30.00%24.0-36.0
CAV20.50%15.2-25.8
Malignancy17.20%12.1-21.9
Nephrotoxicity + CAV9.80%5.9-13.7
Nephrotoxicity + neoplasms7.00%3.6-10.4
CAV + malignancy2.00%0.2-3.8
Others13.00%8.6-17.4
Table 3 Immunosuppressive regimens 12 mo after conversion to everolimus
Immunosuppressor regimenn (%)95%CI
Overall study populationn = 1471
EVL + tacrolimus + MMF ± corticosteroids11 (7.5%)3.2-11.7
EVL + CsA + MMF ± corticosteroids7 (4.8%)1.3-8.2
EVL + tacrolimus ± corticosteroids11 (7.5%)3.2-11.7
EVL + CsA ± corticosteroids67 (45.6%)37.5-53.6
Total with CNIs96 (65.3%)57.6-73.0
EVL + MMF ± corticosteroids44 (29.9%)22.5-37.3
EVL + corticosteroids7 (4.8%)1.3-8.2
Total without CNIs51 (34.7%)27.0-42.4
Patients converted due to nephrotoxicityn = 66
EVL + tacrolimus + MMF ± corticosteroids3 (4.5%)0.1-9.6
EVL + CsA + MMF ± corticosteroids5 (7.6%)1.2-14.0
EVL + tacrolimus ± corticosteroids3 (4.5%)0.1-9.6
EVL + CsA ± corticosteroids23 (34.9%)23.4-46.3
Total with CNIs34 (51.5%)39.5-63.6
EVL + MMF ± corticosteroids27 (40.9%)29.0-52.8
EVL + corticosteroids5 (7.6%)1.2-14.0
Total without CNIs32 (48.5%)36.4-60.5
Table 4 Adverse events with everolimus
Adverse eventn% total events (95%CI) (n = 152)% total evaluable patients (95%CI) (n = 222)
Oedemas2717.8% (11.7-23.8)12.2% (7.9-16.5)
Infections2013.2% (7.8-18.5)9.0% (5.2-12.8)
Gastrointestinal disorders138.6% (4.1-13.0)5.9% (2.8-8.9)
Skin disorders127.9% (3.6-12.2)5.4% (2.4-8.4)
Haematological disorders106.6% (2.6-10.5)4.5% (1.8-7.2)
Pericardial effusion63.9% (0.9-7.0)2.7% (0.6-4.8)
Pneumonitis53.3% (0.5-6.1)2.3% (0.3-4.2)
Oral aphthae32.0% (0.2-4.2)1.4% (0.1-2.9)
Pleural effusion21.3% (0.1-3.1)0.9% (0.1-2.1)
Healing disorders21.3% (0.1-3.1)0.9% (0.1-2.1)
Others5234.2% (26.7-41.8)23.4% (17.9-29.0)
Table 5 Reasons for everolimus withdrawal
Drug withdrawaln% total patients that discontinue treatment (95%CI) (n = 44)% total evaluable patients (95%CI) (n = 222)
Oedemas1329.5% (16.1-43.0)5.9% (2.8-9.8)
Gastrointestinal disorders818.2% (6.8-29.6)3.6% (1.2-6.1)
Bone marrow suppression49.1% (0.6-17.6)1.8% (0.1-3.6)
Pneumonitis49.1% (0.6-17.6)1.8% (0.1-3.6)
Skin disorders24.6% (0.1-10.7)0.9% (0.1-9.5)
Others1431.8% (18.1-45.6)6.3% (3.1-9.5)