Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Mar 24, 2014; 4(1): 18-29
Published online Mar 24, 2014. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i1.18
Published online Mar 24, 2014. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i1.18
Donor | |||||
A | B | O | AB | ||
Recipient | A | - | + | - | + |
B | + | - | - | + | |
O | + | + | - | + | |
AB | - | - | - | - |
Ref. | Type of study | Study population | ABOi population | Desensitization | Outcome |
Hume et al[18] | Observational | 9 | 1 | No treatment | Graft nephrectomy day 17 |
Starzl et al[19] | Observational | 3 | 2 | SPx (1 case) | Graft survival 74 d (1 case), patient death day 24 (1 case) |
Sheil et al[20] | Observational | 2 | 2 | No treatment | Graft nephrectomy day 14 |
Alexandre et al[11] | Observational | 23 | 23 | PE/SPx | 2-yr graft survival: 88% (related donor), 50% (unrelated donor) |
Ota et al[21] | Observational, comparative | 51 | 51 | DFPP and/or IAs/SPx | 2-yr graft survival: 87% vs 84.6% vs 50% ( A- vs B- vs ABO-incompatible) |
Tanabe et al[22] | Observational, comparative | 433 | 67 | DFPP and IAs/SPx | 8-yr graft survival: 73% vs 80 % (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Ishida et al[23] | Observational | 93 | 93 | DFPP/SPx | 5-yr graft survival: 73% |
Ohta et al[24] | Observational, pediatric | 10 | 10 | DFPP or PE or IAs/SPx | 5.4-yr graft survival: 100% |
Shishido et al[25] | Observational, pediatric | 16 | 16 | PE and IAs/SPx | 5-yr graft survival: 85% |
Takahashi et al[2] | Observational, comparative | 1496 | 441 | DFPP or PE or IAs/SPx | 9-yr graft survival: 59% vs 57% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Shimmura et al[26] | Observational, comparative | 167 | 167 | DFPP and/or IAs/SPx | 5-yr graft survival: 74.3% vs 78.5% ( CYA with AZ or MZ vs TAC or MMF) |
Futagawa et al[27] | Observational, comparative | 37803 | 191 | NA | 5-yr graft survival: 66.2% vs 79.5% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Ishida et al[28] | Observational, comparative | 222 | 222 | DFPP/SPx | 5-yr graft survival: 73% vs 90% ( CYA with AZ vs TAC with MMF) |
Tyden et al[29] | Observational, comparative | 334 | 60 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | Graft survival: ABOi 97% (1.5-yr) vs ABOc 95% (1.8-yr) |
Galliford et al[30] | Observational | 10 | 10 | PE/RIT/IVIG | 1-yr graft survival: 100% |
Genberg et al[31] | Observational, comparative | 45 | 15 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | Graft survival: ABOi 86.7% (3.4-yr) vs ABOc 86.7% (4.0-yr) |
Oettl et al[32] | Observational | 10 | 10 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | 1.3-yr graft survival: 100% |
Toki et al[33] | Observational, comparative | 57 | 57 | DFPP/SPx | 8-yr graft survival: 49% vs 95% (AAMR vs non-AAMR) |
Wilpert et al[34] | Observational, comparative | 83 | 40 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | Graft survival: ABOi 100% (3.3-yr) vs ABOc 93% (1.5-yr) |
Tyden et al[1] | Observational, comparative, pediatric | 38 | 10 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | Graft loss within 3 years: ABOi 1 case, ABOc 2 cases |
Flint et al[35] | Observational, comparative | 89 | 37 | PE/IVIG | 1-yr graft survival: 100% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Fichinoue et al[36] | Observational, comparative | 393 | 113 | DFPP or PE/SPx or RIT | 5-yr graft survival: 88.4% vs 90.3% vs 100% (ABOc vs ABOi-SPx vs ABOi-RIT) |
Habicht et al[37] | Observational, comparative | 68 | 21 | IAs/RIT/IVIG | 1-yr graft survival : 100% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Lipshutz et al[38] | Observational | 18 | 18 | PE/RIT/IVIG | 1-yr graft survival: 94.4% |
Shirakawa et al[39] | Observational, comparative | 74 | 74 | DFPP/RIT | 1-yr graft survival: 95.7% vs 98.% ( RIT 500mg vs RIT 200 mg) |
Shishido et al[3] | Observational, comparative, pediatric | 323 | 52 | PE/SPx or RIT | 15-yr graft survival: 86% vs 78% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Montgomery et al[4] | Observational, comparative | 78193 | 738 | NA | 10-yr cumulative incidence of graft loss: 27.1% vs 23.9% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Morath et al[40] | Observational, comparative | 19 | 19 | IAs or IAns/RIT/IVIG | 1-yr graft survival: 100% (IAs vs IAns) |
Uchida et al[41] | Observational | 25 | 25 | DFPP or PE/SPx or RIT | 4.5-yr graft survival: 100% |
Ashimine et al[42] | Observational, comparative | 320 | 92 | DFPP/SPx or RIT or none | 5-yr graft survival: 87% vs 97.7% (ABOi vs ABOc) |
Author | Country,year | Rituximab dose | Pretransplant IS | Antibody depletion | IVIG | Target titer at the time of transplantation | Induction IS | Maintenance IS | Posttransplant antibody depletion |
Adult recipients | |||||||||
Rituximab protocol | |||||||||
Saito et al[53] | Japan,2006 | 375 mg/m2 (twice) at -14 and -1 d | MMF/MP at -1 mo | DFPP or PE | - | < 1:16 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | CYA/MMF/MP | - |
Tyden et al[54] | Sweden, 2006 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/ MMF/Pred at -13 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kg after last IAs | < 1:8 | - | TAC/MMF/Pred | IAs, 3 times |
Chikaraishi et al[55] | Japan,2008 | 100 mg/m2 (twice) at -8 and -1 d | MMF/MP at -14 d, TAC at -3 d | DFPP and PE | - | < 1:8 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/MP | - |
Galliford et al[30] | United Kingdom, 2008 | 1000 mg (twice) at first day of PE and at the operative day | TAC/MMF at -14 d | PE | 0.1 g/kg after each PE | < 1:4 | DAC (2 mg/kg at 0 and 14 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | PE at 1 and 3 d |
Genberg et al[31] | Sweden, 2008 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF/Pred at -10 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kg at -1 d | < 1:8 | - | TAC/MMF/Pred | IAs, 3 times |
Oettl et al[32] | Switzerland, 2009 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF /Pred at -14 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kg after lastIAs | < 1:8 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | IAs or PE (not routinely) |
Sivakumaran et al[78] | United States, 2009 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -3 wk | MMF at -1 mo | PE | 2 g/kg after last PE | NA | ALE (1 mg/kg at 0 and 14 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | - |
Wilpert et al[34] | Germany, 2010 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF or MPS/Pred at -7 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kgat -1 to-5 d | < 1:4 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | IAs (not routinely) |
Fuchinoue et al[36] | Japan,2011 | 100-1000 mg, 1-3 times | CYA or TAC/MMF at -2 d | DFPP or PE | - | < 1:16 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | CYA or TAC/MMF/steroid | - |
Habicht et al[37] | Germany, 2011 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF/Pred at -1 mo | IAs | 30 g at -1to -2 d | < 1:8 | - | TAC/MMF/MP | IAs (not routinely) |
Lipshutz et al[38] | United States, 2011 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF at the first day of PE | PE | 10 g after each PE | < 1:8 | ATG (1.5 mg/kgfor 4 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | PE (not routinely) |
Shirakawa et al[39] | Japan, 2011 | 500 or 200 mg/m2 (once), at -5 to -7 d | TAC/MMF/MP at -7 d | DFPP | - | < 1:32 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/MP | - |
Morath et al[40] | Germany, 2012 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF/MP at the first day of IAs | IAs | 0.5 g/kg after lastIAs | < 1:16 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/MP | IAs or PE (not routinely) |
Uchida et al[41] | Japan,2012 | 150 mg/m2 (twice) at -14 and 0 d | MMF/MP at -1 Mo, CYA or TAC at -3 d | DFPP or PE | - | < 1:16 | BAS (20 mg at 0and 4 d) | CYA or TAC/MMF/MP | - |
Rituximab-free protocol | |||||||||
Montgomery et al[43] | United States,2009 | - | TAC/MMF at the first day of PE | PE | 0.1 g/kg after each PE | < 1:16 | DAC (2 mg/kg initial dose, 1 mg/kg every 2 wk for total 5 doses) | TAC/MMF/Pred | PE, at least twice (with IVIG 0.1 g/kg) |
Flint et al[35] | Australia, 2011 | - | MMF at -10 to -14 d | PE | 0.1 g/kg after each PE | < 1:8 | BAS (20 mg at 0 and 4 d) | TAC/MMF/Pred | PE (not routinely) |
Ashimine et al[42] | Japan,2013 | - | MMF at -14 d | DFPP | - | < 1:8 | BAS (20 mg at 0 and 4 d) | CYA or TAC/MMF/Pred | - |
Pediatric recipients | |||||||||
Genberg et al[31] | Sweden, 2008 | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF/Pred at -10 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kg at -1 d | < 1:8 | - | TAC/MMF/Pred | IAs, 3 times |
Tyden et al[1] | Sweden, 2011[1] | 375 mg/m2 (once) at -1 mo | TAC/MMF/Pred at -13 d | IAs | 0.5 g/kg after lastIAs | < 1:8 | - | TAC/MMF/ Pred | IAs, 3 times |
Pro ABOi-KT |
Reducing waiting list and time |
Expanding living donor pool |
Improvement of patient's prognosis |
Excellent graft survival (comparable with ABOc-KT) |
Contra ABOi-KT |
Comparative high immunological risk |
Higher incidence of acute AMR |
Intensified immunosuppression |
Antibody depletion therapy |
Increasing expenditure |
Higher incidence of viral infection |
- Citation: Muramatsu M, Gonzalez HD, Cacciola R, Aikawa A, Yaqoob MM, Puliatti C. ABO incompatible renal transplants: Good or bad? World J Transplant 2014; 4(1): 18-29
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v4/i1/18.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v4.i1.18