Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2013; 3(4): 99-112
Published online Dec 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.99
Table 1 Comparison of bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell and cord blood
BMPBSCCB
Typical time frame from initiation of search to transplantation3-6 mo3-6 mo2-4 wk
Usual volume500-2000 mL50-300 mL25-150 mL
Adverse effects for donorRisks of wound infection, bleeding, general anesthesia, etc.Risks of bleeding, infection, thrombosis, hypotension, electrolyte disturbance, etc.No
Minimal cell dose for transplantTotal nucleated cell: 2 x 108/kgTotal CD34+ cell: 2 x 106/kgTotal nucleated cell: 2.5 x 107/kg
Red blood cell contentHighLowLow
Possibility to give additional stem cell dosePossiblePossibleImpossible
Exposure to dimethyl sulfoxideNo if freshNo if freshYes
HLA matching requirementMore stringent (7-8 out of 8 matched)More stringent (7-8 out of 8 matched)Less stringent (4-6 out of 6 matched)
Speed of neutrophil engraftmentAbout 3 wkAbout 2 wkAbout 4 wk
Speed of immune reconstitutionFasterFasterSlower
Risk of graft-versus-host diseaseMediumHighestLowest
Risk of post-transplant infectionsLowerLowerHigher
Risk of latent virus transmissionHigherHigherLower
Possibility of CMV transmissionHigher as most donors are CMV seropositiveHigher as most donors are CMV seropositiveLower as most CB units do not harbor CMV
Risk of relapse for high risk patientsHigherLowerHigher
Table 2 Randomized controlled trials comparing bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell for matched related donor transplant
Ref.No.ofpatientsAge of patients (yr)Underlying diseasesConditioningOverall survival (BM vs PBSC)Disease-free survival (BM vs PBSC)Relapse (BM vs PBSC)Transplant-related mortality (BM vs PBSC)Acute graft-versus host disease (BM vs PBSC)Chronic graft-versus host disease (BM vs PBSC)Median time of neutrophil engraftment (d) (BM vs PBSC)Median time of platelet engraftment (d) (BM vs PBSC)
[23,29]567-59Acute leukemias, CML, MDS, MM, NHLMyeloablative148% vs 56%2 (2000 d)50 vs 60%2 (2000 d)NANA23% vs 26%2 (grades 2-4)61% vs 77%2 (extensive cGVHD)18 vs 15a18 vs 12b
[9]3922-51Acute leukemias, CML, CLL, MDS, MM, NHLMyeloablative163% vs 70%2 (2 yr)NA37% vs 0%a (2 yr)32% vs 35%258% vs 68%2 (grades 1-4)40% vs 44%2 (All cGVHD)23 vs 17.5b18 vs 11d
[25]6115-62Acute leukemias, CML, MDS, PMFBu/Cy73% vs 80%2 (4 yr)55% vs 80%2 (4 yr)30% vs 3%210% vs 17%210% vs 21%2 (grades 2-4)27% vs 56%2 (All cGVHD)23 vs 17d21 vs 13d
[10,19]101Mean 37Acute leukemias, CMLMyeloablative165% vs 67%2 (2 yr)66% vs 67%2 (2 yr)15% vs 6%221% vs 25%242% vs 44%2 (grades 2-4)36% vs 65%b (All cGVHD) 17% vs 44%b (extensive cGVHD)21 vs 15321 vs 13d
[15-18]32919-58Acute leukemias, CML, MDSMyeloablative165% vs 65%2 (2 yr) 65% vs 58%2 (3 yr) 57% vs 49%2 (10 yr)60% vs 56%2 (3 yr) 46% vs 42%2 (10 yr)24% vs 20%2 (10 yr)32% vs 24%242% vs 44%a (grades 2-4)56% vs 74%b (All cGVHD) 19% vs 36%b (extensive cGVHD)15 vs 12d20 vs 15d
[12,13,20]17212-55Acute leukemias, CML, CLL, MDS, MM, lymphomasMyeloablative154% vs 66%2 (2 yr) 52% vs 55%2 (10 yr)45% vs 65%a (2 yr) 40% vs 50%a (10 yr)25% vs 14%a (2 yr) 32% vs 20%a (10 yr)30% vs 21%257% vs 64%2 (grades 2-4)52% vs 63%2 (extensive cGVHD)21 vs 16d19 vs 13d
[11]22719-64AML, CML, MDSBu/Cy60% vs 68%a (30 mo)NA9% vs 9%232% vs 21%244% vs 44%2 (grades 2-4)69% vs 85%2 (All cGVHD) 30% vs 40%2 (extensive cGVHD)23 vs 19d22 vs 16d
[30]11015-62Acute leukemias, MDS, MM, lymphomasMyeloablative160% vs 34%a (4 yr)NA13% vs 18%228% vs 41%237% vs 52%2 (grades 2-4)45% vs 61%2 (All cGVHD) 16% vs 28%2 (extensive cGVHD)20 vs 15d38 vs 25d
[14]7218-61CMLMyeloablative172% vs 81%2 (3 yr)65% vs 81%2 (3 yr)15% vs 0%a (3 yr)20% vs 19%249% vs 55%2 (grades 2-4)50% vs 59%2 (extensive cGVHD)22 vs 17a21 vs 142