Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Dec 24, 2013; 3(4): 78-90
Published online Dec 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i4.78
Table 1 Summary of some of the observational studies describing the VO2peak levels in heart transplant recipients
StudynMean age (yr)Mean time after HTxVO2peak: mL/kg per minute or L/minVO2peak (% of age-predicted value)Percent of age-predicted HRmax or actual HRmax (bpm)
Renlund et al[123]
110
51 ± 10
26 mo
17.7 ± 0.3 mL
64% ± 1%
85%
Mandak et al[51]
60
52 ± 10
1 yr
16.2 ± 3.8 mL
NA
137 ± 24
Osada et al[124]
56
50 ± 12
3 yr
20.0 ± 5.0 mL
70% ± 17%
88% ± 11%
Notarius et al[12]
12
51 ± 4
8 mo
17.3 ± 1.7 mL
57%
147 ± 7
Douard et al[30]
85
52 ± 12
0-100 mo
21.1 ± 6 mL
NA
85% ± 13%
Squires et al[24]
95
48 ± 14
1 yr
19.9 ± 4.8 mL
61% ± 15%
138 ± 22
Gullestad et al[48]
174
51 ± 1
3.5 yr
19.4 ± 0.4 mL
70% ± 1%
146 ± 2
Myers et al[125]
47
47 ± 12
4.8 yr
9.4 ± 2.6 mL
59% ± 14%
129 ± 18
Schmid et al[126]
17
58 ± 13
65 ± 27
20.9 ± 5.2 mL
NA
136 ± 12
Richard et al[127]
7
40 ± 13
2 yr
NA
101% ± 12%
93% ± 9%
Carter et al[2]
47
48
5 yr
16.1 ± 0.5 mL
51% ± 1.5%
74% ± 1%
Ulubay et al[118]743 ± 1419 mo1.45 ± 0.33 LNA114 ± 41
Table 2 Possible mechanisms associated with reduced exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients
Central factors
Reduced cardiac output
Chronotropic incompetence
Reduced stroke volume
Systolic dysfunction
Diastolic dysfunction
Pulmonary dysfunction
Pulmonary hypertension
Lung disease
Pulmonary congestion
Peripheral factors
Decreased skeletal muscle function
Reduced muscle mass
Reduced muscle strength
Reduced capillary density
Reduced oxidative capacity
Reduced mitochondrial function
Corticosteroid induced myopathy
Impaired vasodilatory capacity
Endothelial dysfunction
Deconditioning
Potential factors contributing to reduced exercise capacity
Increasing age
Donor age
Donor match
Ischemic time
Pre transplant de-conditioning
Primary diagnosis
Co-morbidities
Smoking
Cultural differences
Gender differences
Anxiety and depression
Socio-economic status
Reduced health-related quality of life
Table 3 Summary of randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of exercise in heart transplant recipients
Studyn, mean age (yr)Mean time after HTxInterventionMean change in VO2peak (mL/kg per minute) within groupsMean change in VO2peak (mL/kg per minute) between groups
Kobashigawa et al[3]27, 521 mo6 mo partly supervised rehabilitation program vs controls CGEx: 9.2 → 13.62.5
Walking: cycling and upper and lower limb exercises for 30 min × 1-3/wkCon: 10.4 → 12.3
Tegtbur et al[26]32, 555 yr1 yr home-based exercise program vs controlsEx: 18.6 → 20.01.3
Cycling every other day for 1 yr at 80%-90% of maximum HRCon: 18.9 → 19.0
Bernardi et al[6]24, 526 mo6 mo home training vs controlsEx: 14.9 → 19.63.4
Cycling at 60%-70% of VO2peak 30 min × 5/wk × 6 moCon: 14.3 → 15.6
Karapolat et al[5]28, 421.5 yr8 wk supervised hospital training vs home-based training
1.5 h of multiple exercises: including aerobic exercise for 30 min at 60%-70% of VO2peak× 3/wkEx: 16.7 → 19.53.4
The controls received written guidelines on exercises and a walking programCon: 20.1 → 19.5
Wu et al[27]37, 562 yr8 wk home training vs controls
Strength training and aerobic exercise at 60%-70% of VO2peak: 35-40 min × 3/wkEx: 12.1 → 13.21.6
Con: 13.7 → 13.2
Haykowsky et al[25]43, 595 yr12 wk aerobic/strength training vs controls
First 8 wk: continuous aerobic exercise at 60%-80% of VO2peak: 30-45 min × 2/wk
Continuous aerobic training at 80% of VO2peak, 45 min × 2/wk and bicycle interval training for 30 s at 90%-100% of VO2peak: followed by 60 s rest for 10-25 reps × 2/wk in the final 4 wkEx: 21.2 → 24.73.5
Resistance training at 50% of 1RM: 10-15 reps × 1-2 sets × 4 exercises × 2/wk for 12 wkCon: 18.2 → 18.2
Hermann et al[16]27, 507 yr8 wk high-intensity interval training vs controls
Interval blocks of 4 min/2 min/30 s: corresponding to 80%: 85% and 90% of VO2peak: respectively: and recovery periods of ½ min: and finally staircase running at 80% of VO2peak: followed by recovery walking 60 min × 3/wkEx: 23.9 → 28.35.6
Con: 24.6 → 23.4
Nytrøen et al[18]48, 514 yr1 yr high-intensity interval training vs controls
4 interval blocks of 4 min each performed at 91% of peak HR: with 3 min active recovery periods between each blockEx: 27.7 → 30.93.6
3 periods of 8 wk distributed throughout 1 yr with exercise 3/wk for a total of 72 exercise sessionsCon: 28.5 → 28.0