Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Transplant. Jun 24, 2013; 3(2): 7-25
Published online Jun 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i2.7
Published online Jun 24, 2013. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v3.i2.7
Table 1 Withdrawal/conversion study
Study (yr) | Intervention arm | Control arm | CNI sparing strategy | Study length (mo) |
RMR (2004) | SRL, Steroids, CsA→Withdrawal by 3 mo (n = 215) | SRL, Steroids, CsA (n = 215) | Withdrawal by 3 mo | 48 |
Spare the Nephron (2011) | MMF, S, CNI→SRL (30-180 d) (n = 148) | MMF, S, CNI (n = 151) | Conversion by 30-180 d | 24 |
CONCEPT (2009) | MMF, S, CsA→SRL by 3 mo (n = 95) | MMF, S, CsA (n = 97) | Conversion by 3 mo | 12 |
SMART (2010) | MMF, S, CsA→SRL 10-24 d (n = 70) | MMF, S, CsA (n = 71) | Conversion by 10-24 d | 12 |
ZEUS (2012) | EC-MPS, S, CsA→EVR by 4.5 d (n = 154) | EC-MPS, S, CsA (n = 146) | Conversion by 4.5 mo | 36 |
HERAKLES (2012) | EC-MPS, S, CsA→EVR by 3 mo (n = 171) | EC-MPS, S, CsA (n = 166) | Conversion by 3 mo | 12 |
Table 2 Withdrawal/conversion trials
Study (yr) | Drugs | F-up(mo) | Patient survival | Graft survival | Biopsyproven acuterejection | Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min) | ||||
SRL/EVR | CNI | SRL/ EVR | CNI | SRL/EVR | CNI | SRL/EVR | CNI | |||
RMR (2004) | SRL (SRL+CsA) | 48 | 95.3% | 92.1% | 91.5% | 84.2% | 10.2 | 6.5 | 58.3 | 43.8 |
Spare the Nephron (2011) | SRL/CNI | 24 | 100% | 97.5% | 100% | 98.7% | 9.5 | 11.3 | 59.5 | 58.8 |
CONCEPT (2009) | SRL/CsA | 12 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99.0% | 16.8 | 8.2 | 69.6 | 64.8 |
SMART (2010) | SRL/CsA | 12 | 99.0% | 99% | 99.0% | 97.0% | 17.4 | 15.5 | 64.5 | 53.4 |
ZEUS (2012) | EVR/CsA | 36 | 98.1% | 97.9% | 98.7% | 98.6% | 13.0 | 4.8 | 67.9 | 60.6 |
HERAKLES (2012) | EVR/CsA | 12 | 99.4% | 98.8% | 99.4% | 99.4% | 10.0 | 8.4 | 68.6 | 63.0 |
Table 3 Selected randomized trials on calcineurin inhibitors minimization
Study (yr) | Intervention arm | Control arm | CNI minimization | Study lenght (mo) |
Andres (2009) | IL2Ri + lCsA + MMF + S | IL2Ri + lowCsA + MMF + S | Minimization | 6 |
US09 (2008) | IL2Ri + EVR + lowTAC + S | IL2Ri + EVR + TAC + S | Minimization | 6 |
Ciancio (2005) | Alem + lowTAC + lowMMF | rATG + TAC + MMF + S | Minimization | 12 |
De Sevaux (2001) | lowCsA + MMF + S | CsA + MMF + S | Minimization | 6 |
CAESAR (2007) | IL2Ri +lowCsA + MMF + S | CsA + MMF + S | Minimization | 12 |
ELITE SYMPHONY (2007) | DAC+lTAC/lCsA/SRL+MMF+S | DAC+sCsA+MMF+S | Minimization | 36 |
OptiCept (2009 | Induction + lowCNI +MMF + S | Induction + CNI + MMF + S | Minimization | 24 |
Hernandez (2007) | IL2Ri + lowCsA + MMF + S | IL2Ri + CsA + MMF + S | Mimimization | 24 |
Kandaswamy (2005 | rATG + lowTAC + S | rATG + TAC + S | Minimization | 24 |
RADB156 (2004) | IL2Ri + lowCsA + EVR + S | IL2Ri + CsA+ EVR + S | Minimization | 36 |
EVEREST (2009 | standEVR + lowCsA +S | HighEVR + vlowCsa +S | Minimization | 36 |
Vathsala (2005) | Alem + lowCsA | CsA + AZA + S | Minimization | 6 |
ASSET (2012 ) | EVR + lowTAC | EVR + vlowTAC | Minimization | 12 |
Table 4 Efficacy and effects on biopsy proven and glomerular filtration rate of the main minimization trials
Calcineurin inhibitors | F-up (mo) | Acute rejection | Graft survival | Biopsy proven | Glomerular filtration rate | |
OptiCept | CsA/TAC | 24 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
CAESAR | CsA | 12 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
ASSET | TAC | 12 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
Andres | CsA | 6 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
2309 | CsA | 12 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
EVEREST | CsA | 36 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
REFERENCE Study | CsA | 24 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
De Sevaux | CsA | 6 | Similar | Similar | Similar | Similar |
Table 5 Glomerular filtration rate gain in different minimization trials
Study | Calcineurin inhibitors | Length | Glomerular filtration rate gain (mL/min) |
US09 | TAC | 6 mo | +2.8 |
De Sevaux | CsA | 6 mo | +4.0 |
CAESAR Study | CsA | 12 mo | +2.3 |
SYMPHONY Study | TAC vs CsA | 3 yr | +4.6 |
A2309 | CsA | 12 mo | +1.9 |
ASSET Study | TAC | 12 mo | +5.3 |
B156 | CsA | 3 yr | +4.9 |
EVEREST | CsA | 6 mo | +2.1 |
Table 6 Immunosuppression regimens in alemtuzumab minimization trials
Ref. | Study group | Control group | ||||
Induction | Maintenance | Induction | Maintenance | |||
Chan et al[59] | Alem | TAC, Ster | 82 | Dac | TAC, MMF, Ster | 41 |
Hanaway et al[60] | Alem | TAC, MMF, Ster | 164 70 | Bas rATG | TAC, MMF, Ster TAC, MMF, Ster | 171 69 |
Ciancio et al[61] | Alem | TAC, MMF | 13 | Dac rATG | TAC, MMF, Ster TAC, MMF, Ster | 12 13 |
Ciancio et al[62] | Alem | TAC, MMF, Ster | 30 | Dac rATG | TAC, MMF, Ster TAC, MMF, Ster | 30 30 |
Farney et al[63] | Alem | TAC/CsA, MMF, Ster | 85 | rATG | TAC/CsA, MMF, Ster | 95 |
Vathsala et al[64] | Alem | CsA, Ster | 20 | None | CsA, AZA, Ster | 10 |
Table 7 Selected randomized trials on calcineurin inhibitors avoidance
Study (yr) | Intervention arm | Control arm | Study length (mo) |
Flechner (2004) | IL2Ri+ SRLcc + MMF + S (n = 31) | IL2Ri + CsA + MMF + S (n = 30) | 24 |
Flechner (2007) | IL2Ri +SRLcc + MMF+S (n = 31) | IL2Ri + CsA + MMF + S (n = 30) | 60 |
Larson (2006) | rATG + SRL + MMF + S (n = 81) | rATG + TAC + MMF + S (n = 84) | 12 |
SYMPHONY (2007) | IL2Ri + low SRL + MMF + S (n = 399) | IL2Ri+sCsA+MMF+S (n = 390) | 36 |
Hamdy (2008) | IL2Ri + SRL+ MMF+S (n = 67) | IL2Ri + lowTAC+ SRL+S (n = 65) | 60 |
Lo (2004) | rATG+SRL+MMF+S (n = 41) | rATG+TAC+MMF+S (n = 29) | 12 |
Ruggenenti (2007) | Alem+SRL+MMF+ S (n = 11) | Alem+ CsA+MMF+S (n = 10) | 24 |
Spiesser group (2007) | rATG +SRL + MMF + S (n = 71) | rATG + CsA +MMF+S (n = 74) | 12 |
Glotz (2010 ) | rATG + SRL+ MMF + S (n = 71) | rATG+ TAC+ MMF+ S (n = 70) | 12 |
ORION (2011) | IL-2Ri + SRL + MMF+S (n = 155) | IL-2Ri + TAC + MMF + S (n = 140) | 24 |
Table 8 Calcineurin inhibitors avoidance trials
Study (yr) | Drugs | F-Up(mo) | Patient survival | Graft survival | Biopsy provenAcute rejection | Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min) | ||||
SRL | CNI | SRL | CNI | SRL | CNI | SRL | CNI | |||
Flechner (2004) | SRL/CsA | 24 | 93.50% | 100% | 93.50% | 93.60% | 6.50% | 16.60% | 60.6 | 49.2 |
Flechner (2007) | SRL/CsA | 60 | 87.10% | 90% | 83.90% | 76.70% | 12.90% | 23.30% | 66.7 | 50.7 |
Larson (2006) | SRL/TAC | 12 | 98.00% | 96% | 94% | 92% | 13% | 10% | 63 | 61 |
SYMPHONY (2007) | SRL/CsA | 36 | 95% | 94% | 85% | 87% | 39% | 27% | 71.1 | 67.1 |
Hamdy (2008 ) | SRL/TAC | 60 | 98.50% | 93.80% | 88% | 83% | NA | NA | 89 | 93 |
Lo (2004) | SRL/TAC | 12 | 100% | 98% | 89% | 80% | 7% | 10% | 72.4 | 50.5 |
Ruggenenti (2007) | SRL/CsA | 24 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 52 | 49.8 |
Spiesser Group (2007) | SRL/TAC | 12 | 97% | 97% | 90% | 93% | 14.30% | 8.60% | 69 | 60 |
Glotz (2010) | SRL/TAC | 12 | 95.80% | 97.10% | 85.90% | 95.70% | 16.90% | 12.90% | 56.1 | 58.4 |
ORION (2011) | SRL/TAC | 24 | 94.5% | 97% | 89.9% | 95.4% | 32.8% | 12.3% | 63.4 | 66.7 |
- Citation: Salvadori M, Bertoni E. Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation? World J Transplant 2013; 3(2): 7-25
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v3/i2/7.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v3.i2.7