Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Transplant. Mar 18, 2023; 13(3): 58-85
Published online Mar 18, 2023. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i3.58
Published online Mar 18, 2023. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i3.58
Table 1 The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation primary graft dysfunction definition and severity grading 2005 and 2016
PGD stage | PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) | Chest X-ray findings | 2016 update |
0 | > 300 | Normal | Any P/F ratio |
1 | > 300 | Diffuse allograft infiltration/pulmonary oedema | No changes |
2 | 200-300 | Diffuse allograft infiltration/pulmonary oedema | No changes |
3 | < 200 | Diffuse allograft infiltration/pulmonary oedema | No changes |
Table 2 Basic phenotypes of chronic lung allograft dysfunction
Phenotypes | Spirometry changes | CT opacities |
CLAD | Persistent ≥ 20% decline in FEV1 (based on 2 FEV1 values ≥3 wk apart) compared to baseline | |
BOS | CLAD and obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.7) | No |
RAS | CLAD and restriction (≥ 10% decline in TLC from baseline) | Yes |
Mixed phenotype | CLAD with obstruction and restriction | Yes |
Undefined phenotype | CLAD with obstruction and/or restriction | Yes/No |
Table 3 2019 chronic lung allograft dysfunction staging from the 2019 consensus definition
CLAD stage | Spirometric values |
CLAD 0 | Current FEV1 > 80% baseline |
CLAD 1 | Current FEV1 > 65%-80% baseline |
CLAD 2 | Current FEV1 > 50%-65% baseline |
CLAD 3 | Current FEV1> 35%-50% baseline |
CLAD 4 | Current FEV1 ≤ 35% baseline |
Table 4 Oxyhemoglobin saturation and positive end-expiratory pressure combinations for low tidal volume ventilation in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome by the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network[124]
Arterial oxygenation and PEEP | |
Target Oxygenation PaO2 = 55-80 mmHg (7.35-10.7 kPa)or O2 saturations (SpO2) = 88%-95% | |
FiO2/PEEP combinations | |
FiO2 (%) | PEEP (H2O) |
30 | 5 |
40 | 5-8 |
50 | 8-10 |
60 | 10 |
70 | 10-14 |
80 | 14 |
90 | 14-18 |
100 | 18-24 |
Table 5 Differences between the ex-vivo lung perfusion protocols
Description | Lund | OCS | Toronto |
Year | 2001[176] | 2011[222] | 2008[177] |
Perfusion parameters | |||
Perfusate | CellularSteen solution + RBCs | CellularOCS proprietary solution + RBCs | AcellularSteen solution |
Target haematocrit | 14% | 15%-25% | N/A |
Target flow | 100% cardiac output | 2.0-2.5 L/min | 40% cardiac output |
PA pressure | ≤ 20 mmHg | ≤ 20 mmHg | Flow dictated (usually < 15 mmHg) |
Left atrium | Open | Open | Closed |
Flow type | Continuous | Pulsatile | Continuous |
Ventilation | |||
Initial temperature | 32 oC | 34 oC | 32 oC |
Tidal volume | 5-7 mL/kg | 6 mL/kg | 7 mL/kg |
Respiratory rate | 20/min | 10/min | 7/min |
FiO2 | 50% | 12% | 21% |
PEEP | 5 cmH2O | 5-7 cmH2O | 5 cmH2O |
Table 6 List of biomarkers that have been used in primary graft dysfunction
Biomarker | Donor/recipient | Timing | Type |
RAGE[179] | Donor | Retrieval | Alveolar epithelium |
Recipient | Intraoperative, post-transplant | ||
PAI-1[175] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Vascular endothelium |
Protein C[179] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Vascular endothelium |
IL-8[176] | Donor | EVLP | Inflammatory marker |
Recipient | Pre-transplant | ||
Post-transplant | |||
ET-1[171] | Donor | EVLP | Inflammatory marker |
ICAM-1[27] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Vascular endothelium |
IL-6[135] | Recipient | Pre-transplant | Inflammatory marker |
Post-transplant | |||
IL-10[135] | Recipient | Pre-transplant | Inflammatory marker |
Post-transplant | |||
proADM[178] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Vascular endothelium |
TNF-α[139] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Inflammatory marker |
P-selectin[26] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Vascular endothelium |
SP-D[179] | Recipient | Post-transplant | Alveolar epithelium |
- Citation: Avtaar Singh SS, Das De S, Al-Adhami A, Singh R, Hopkins PM, Curry PA. Primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation: From pathogenesis to future frontiers. World J Transplant 2023; 13(3): 58-85
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v13/i3/58.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v13.i3.58