Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Transplant. Feb 28, 2020; 10(2): 29-46
Published online Feb 28, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29
Published online Feb 28, 2020. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29
Table 1 Epstein-Barr virus-positive vs Epstein-Barr virus-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders[25]
EBV-positive PTLD | EBV-negative PTLD | |
Molecular-genomic studies | Fewer genomic abnormalities | Share many genomic/ transcriptmic features with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in IC patients |
Origin | Mostly B-cell proliferative lesions | Mostly T-cell proliferative lesions |
Gene-expression | “Non-germinal” center B-cell | “Germinal center B-cell type”[4] |
Prevalence | More common (first peak) | Less common (second peak) |
Risk of PTLD | Less risk compared to seronegative TR | Seronegative SOT pediatric TR are more vulnerable to develop PTLD with increased estimated risk of 10-75[16,17] |
SOT vs HSCT | Almost all cases of HSCT (100%) are EBV positive | In SOT, both EBV positive and negative are present |
Clinical consequences of EBV status | Less clear | Less clear |
Prognosis/response to therapy in adults. | Not prognostic/predictive of response to therapy[21,23] | |
Common criteria | A considerable proportion of both EBV+ve and -ve PTLD respond to RI as a sole intervention[24] | |
Future studies | Whole-exome/genome wide sequencing and studies of role of EBV-associated microRNAs, may further define PTLD pathogenesis with more precise molecular-genomic classification of both EBV+ve and EBV-ve PTLD |
Table 2 Early vs late onset post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in adults[4]
Early PTLD | Late onset PTLD | |
General characteristics | EBV positivity | Frequent EBV negative tumors |
Graft involvement | Less often graft involvement[3] | |
Less often: Extranodal disease | Extra-nodal disease: Common | |
Nondestructive PTLD1: Present early | High incidence of late onset Hodgkin’s lymphoma after allogeneic HSCT | |
Less often: Monomorphic subtype[3] | Specific tumorigenic events: C-myc translocations | |
Origin: higher % of donor-derived PTLD especially in 1st post-tx year) | Elevated LDH level | |
Risk factors | Same | Same |
Response to therapy | Same | Same |
Patient survival (at 1- and 5- yr) | 65% and 46%, (In adult heart/lung tx)[1,45] | 53% and 41% (In adult heart/lung tx)[1,45] |
Future therapy | Proteasome inhibition (bortezomib) may be useful after allogeneic HSCT[3] | |
Role of immun-osuppression | Induction therapy has a role | Cumulative immunosuppression is crucial |
Prevalence | Majority of PTLD cases | Less prevalent |
Table 3 Early vs late onset post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in pediatrics[46]
Early PTLD | Late PTLD | |
General criteria | Diffuse large B-cell or other B-cell lymphoma | Burkitt’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease are late events[47] |
Atypical presentation (graft dysfunction, abdominal pain, frequent extra-nodal involvement in > 80% of TR)[46] | Frequent EBV negative tumors. Specific tumorigenic events e.g., C-myc translocations are restricted to late PTLDs | |
Time to PTLD | Shortest for lung, heart/lung TR. Early PTLD is quite frequent in liver TR (Late PTLD beyond 5 yr is rare, immunosuppression can be tapered/hold due to tolerance) | Longest for the heart TR and at risk for late PTLD even > 10 yr after trans-plantation |
Patient survival | No significant difference in most published studies[20,47-49] | |
Distinct criteria | B-cell origin, almost exclusively EBV+ve, reflecting reduced immunosurv-eillance as major pathogenetic factor | Resembles tumors with distinct pathogenetic alterations and nodal appearance[46] |
Role of immunos-uppression | Induction therapy has a role. More likely to develop graft rejection and switch to Tac before PTLD diagnosis | Cumulative immunosuppression is crucial |
- Citation: Abbas F, El Kossi M, Shaheen IS, Sharma A, Halawa A. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: Current concepts and future therapeutic approaches. World J Transplant 2020; 10(2): 29-46
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3230/full/v10/i2/29.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29