Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2025; 15(3): 104230
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i3.104230
What about the caregivers? Rethinking chronic illness support in the age of transplantation
Hirak Pahari, Department of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110060, Delhi, India
Shikhar Tripathi, Samiran Nundy, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplant, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110060, Delhi, India
ORCID number: Hirak Pahari (0000-0002-1946-680X); Shikhar Tripathi (0000-0002-2148-9058); Samiran Nundy (0000-0002-1757-3919).
Author contributions: Pahari H designed the overall concept and outline of the manuscript; Tripathi S contributed to the discussion and design of the manuscript; Pahari H, Tripathi S, and Nundy S contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript and literature review; all authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Hirak Pahari, MD, Department of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi 110060, Delhi, India. hirak.pahari@gmail.com
Received: December 16, 2024
Revised: March 2, 2025
Accepted: March 12, 2025
Published online: September 18, 2025
Processing time: 125 Days and 16.9 Hours

Abstract

Caregivers play an essential but often unacknowledged role in healthcare, particularly in chronic illness and post-transplantation scenarios. We highlight the profound emotional, physical, and logistical challenges caregivers face, as illuminated by recent studies, including the work of Virches et al about liver transplantation. Pre-transplant caregiving is marked by heightened stress, depression, and emotional strain, as caregivers navigate the unpredictability of conditions like cirrhosis. While liver transplantation significantly alleviates caregiver burden by stabilizing patient health, caregiving evolves rather than ends, requiring ongoing vigilance for post-transplant care, medication adherence, and lifestyle adjustments. We examine the disproportionate impact of caregiving on the family, due to entrenched cultural and gender norms and highlight how these disparities reinforce systemic neglect. Caregiving, often viewed as a familial duty, carries financial, mental, and physical health costs, perpetuating inequities and marginalization. We argue that caregivers are integral to healthcare outcomes and must be included in systemic frameworks to improve patient care. We also advocate for a paradigm shift from patient-centered to family-centered care, emphasizing caregiver inclusion as a core healthcare priority. Policy recommendations related to financial support, respite care, education, and mental health services should be tailored for caregivers. By addressing caregiver needs, healthcare systems can improve patient outcomes, reduce costs, and foster equity. This editorial underscores that caregivers are not ancillary but central to healthcare’s success. Recognizing and supporting them is both an ethical responsibility and a practical necessity for sustainable healthcare.

Key Words: Caregiver; Liver transplantation; Ripple effect; Stress; Depression; Liver; Cirrhosis; Family-centered care; Burnout; Financial burden

Core Tip: Caregivers play an essential but often unacknowledged role in healthcare, particularly in chronic illness and post-transplantation scenarios. We highlight the profound emotional, physical, and logistical challenges caregivers face. We advocate for a paradigm shift from patient-centered to family-centered care, emphasizing caregiver inclusion as a core healthcare priority. This editorial underscores that caregivers are not ancillary but central to healthcare’s success. Recognizing and supporting them is both an ethical responsibility and a practical necessity for sustainable healthcare.



INTRODUCTION

In healthcare, the spotlight has traditionally remained fixed on the patient - their symptoms, diagnosis, and eventual recovery. The patient is the cornerstone of medical attention, while the complex network of individuals who support them often fades into the background. Medical interventions like liver transplantation (LT) are celebrated as marvels of modern medicine, capable of saving lives and significantly enhancing the quality of those lives. However, this focus on patient outcomes frequently overlooks the silent, unacknowledged struggles of caregivers. These individuals are an integral part of the healthcare journey, yet their sacrifices and challenges often go unnoticed.

Caregivers - spouses, children, siblings, or friends - assume the enormous responsibility of tending to patients before and after transplantation. This role requires them to juggle emotional, physical, and logistical demands that can quickly escalate to overwhelming levels. Studies estimate that up to 40% of caregivers of transplant recipients experience significant psychological distress, including anxiety and depression[1]. Additionally, the economic burden is substantial. In the United States alone, unpaid caregiving contributes an estimated 470 billion dollars in economic value annually, a figure that rivals national healthcare expenditures[2]. Despite this massive contribution, caregivers often lack financial support, adequate training, or access to mental health resources.

The article by Virches et al[3] on caregiver burden before and after LT is a call to action, emphasizing the need to address the often-neglected experiences of family caregivers. Their research underscores a crucial question: How do we incorporate caregivers into the broader framework of healthcare outcomes? If we measure success in healthcare by improvements in quality of life, shouldn’t that metric extend beyond the patient to include their caregivers? Caregivers are not merely incidental figures in the healthcare journey - they are collaborators in recovery and essential to the long-term well-being of the patient.

What obligations do we have to the individuals who shoulder this invisible burden? Should healthcare systems be designed to not only treat patients but also provide resources, respite, and emotional support to those who care for them? These questions demand urgent attention, as the health and well-being of caregivers are inextricably linked to the success of medical interventions like LT. Ignoring their needs not only undermines the caregiving process but also jeopardizes patient outcomes. It is time to expand the scope of healthcare to embrace a more inclusive and equitable model that recognizes the invaluable role of caregivers as both stakeholders and beneficiaries of the system.

WHY ARE CAREGIVERS’ BURDENS STILL INVISIBLE?

Caregiving is an act of love and duty, but it often comes at a personal cost. Family caregivers, particularly those of chronic illness patients, face a heightened risk of stress, depression, and even physical health decline. They are often described as the "hidden patients" within the healthcare system, individuals whose health and well-being are profoundly affected by their caregiving responsibilities yet rarely acknowledged in clinical settings or public policy. This is not a new revelation; caregiver burden has been extensively documented in the literature. Studies have estimated that caregivers in the United States provide over 470 billion dollars worth of unpaid labor annually[2], an amount that rivals national healthcare budgets. Despite this staggering economic contribution, caregivers often lack access to financial compensation, mental health resources, or adequate respite care. Their efforts, though indispensable, are undervalued and often invisible to the larger societal framework.

Caregiving for chronic liver disease presents unique challenges. Cirrhosis is a long, unpredictable battle marked by cycles of stability and acute decline. The condition often requires vigilant monitoring for complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, and fluid overload. These medical crises demand swift action, placing caregivers in high-stakes decision-making roles for which they may feel unprepared. Frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits disrupt caregivers' routines, contributing to feelings of helplessness and chronic stress. Moreover, the progressive nature of the disease means that caregivers face the emotional strain of watching their loved one’s health deteriorate, compounded by uncertainties about prognosis and treatment outcomes[4].

Adding to this burden is the stigma often associated with chronic liver disease, particularly when linked to conditions such as alcoholism. Caregivers may encounter judgment from others, further isolating them from potential sources of emotional and social support. Studies, including the one by Virches et al[3], highlight how the lack of systemic support at both the community and healthcare levels and the inevitability of prolonged care intensify this burden[1]. The result is a caregiver population at heightened risk of burnout, depression, and physical health complications, yet one that remains largely unrecognized and unsupported.

This invisibility partially stems from societal norms. Caregiving is frequently viewed as an extension of familial duty rather than a role deserving of formal recognition or support. Cultural expectations, especially in low - and middle-income countries, place the onus of caregiving on women, who are often expected to manage caregiving alongside household and professional responsibilities. These norms not only perpetuate gender disparities but also reinforce the systemic neglect of caregivers as a distinct demographic with unique needs. Acknowledging the burdens faced by caregivers is the first step toward addressing them. Comprehensive caregiving policies, increased public awareness, and a shift in healthcare paradigms to include caregiver support are urgently needed to bring this invisible labor force into focus. Only then can we ensure that caregivers receive the recognition, resources, and respect they so rightfully deserve.

DOES LT LIGHTEN THE LOAD?

One of the most compelling aspects of LT is its ripple effect. The procedure not only restores quality of life for the patient but also alleviates some of the psychological and physical burdens faced by their caregivers[3]. For many caregivers, the surgery marks a turning point - a transition from the relentless, often chaotic demands of pre-transplant care to a more structured and manageable post-transplant routine. Other research corroborates these findings, showing that caregivers of liver transplant recipients report significantly reduced levels of stress and depression post-transplant, with many regaining a sense of normalcy that had been absent during the patient’s illness[5]. This relief is not just anecdotal but is reflected in measurable improvements in caregivers' mental health and overall well-being.

However, this relief is not absolute. Caregiving does not end after the surgery; it merely evolves. Transplant recipients require long-term monitoring, adherence to complex medication regimens, and lifestyle adjustments to maintain the health of the graft and prevent complications. These responsibilities can be daunting, particularly for caregivers who may lack the medical knowledge or resources to navigate these requirements effectively. As noted by Young et al[6], caregivers often continue to face significant challenges in the post-transplant phase, including constant vigilance for signs of graft rejection, managing follow-up appointments, and supporting the patient’s emotional recovery.

Moreover, while the immediate stressors of acute illness may diminish, new stressors can emerge. Financial strain, stemming from long-term healthcare costs, and the lingering emotional toll of the caregiving journey often remain. Caregivers may also experience a form of anticipatory anxiety, worrying about the possibility of graft failure or the recurrence of the patient’s illness. These ongoing pressures underscore the need for comprehensive post-transplant support systems that address not only the patient’s medical needs but also the emotional and logistical challenges faced by caregivers. Therefore, LT is not a complete reprieve for caregivers but rather a shift in the nature of their responsibilities. While it provides undeniable relief and improves the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, it also highlights the importance of sustained support for this often-overlooked group. Recognizing the complexities of the caregiving journey post-transplant is essential to truly alleviating their burden and ensuring better outcomes for all involved.

A JOURNEY OF TWO BURDENS

Caregiving in the context of LT is not a singular experience but rather a continuum of evolving responsibilities. The demands on caregivers before transplantation are markedly different from those after the procedure. Pre-transplant caregivers navigate an unpredictable and often overwhelming journey, managing the progressive decline of a loved one with end-stage liver disease. This period is characterized by extensive medical management, including medication adherence, dietary restrictions, and constant monitoring for hepatic complications such as encephalopathy and fluid overload. The stress is compounded by frequent hospitalizations and the uncertainty of whether their loved one will receive a transplant in time.

Post-transplant caregiving, while associated with relief and improved patient prognosis, introduces a new set of challenges. The burden shifts from managing the trajectory of a deteriorating illness to supporting long-term recovery and graft survival. This includes stringent medication schedules for immunosuppressants, monitoring for signs of rejection or infection, attending frequent follow-up appointments, and assisting with lifestyle modifications. Many caregivers struggle with the persistent anxiety of graft failure, ongoing healthcare costs, and the psychological toll of adjusting to a new “normal”.

While LT alleviates many acute stressors, it does not eliminate the burden of caregiving; it transforms it. Recognizing and addressing these distinct phases of caregiving is crucial for providing effective support. Structured interventions tailored to both pre- and post-transplant caregivers, such as counseling, education on post-transplant care, and long-term mental health resources, are essential to improving caregiver well-being and, by extension, patient outcomes.

HOW DO GENDER AND CULTURE SHAPE THE CAREGIVING EXPERIENCE?

Globally, caregiving responsibilities are disproportionately borne by women. In Brazil, where Virches et al’s study[3] was conducted, most caregivers were female, reflecting entrenched cultural norms that assign caregiving roles primarily to women. This phenomenon is not unique to Brazil. Across the globe, women account for the majority of unpaid caregivers, often balancing these responsibilities with employment and other household duties. Reviews have noted that women are more likely to experience the “caregiver penalty”, a term describing the career disruptions, financial instability, and mental health challenges that often accompany caregiving[7]. Cultural expectations play a significant role in shaping these dynamics. In many societies, caregiving is seen as an extension of a woman’s familial duty - a responsibility rooted in traditional gender roles. This perception frames caregiving as an innate obligation rather than a skill-based, demanding role that requires systemic support. As a result, women are often left to shoulder these responsibilities with little to no assistance, reinforcing societal inequalities and limiting opportunities for economic and personal growth.

This burden is further exacerbated in cultures where caregiving is stigmatized when associated with certain illnesses. For example, caregivers of patients with cirrhosis linked to alcohol abuse may face societal judgment, which can lead to isolation and additional stress. These cultural stigmas not only place emotional strain on caregivers but also deter them from seeking help, thereby perpetuating the invisibility of their struggles. In addition to cultural norms, socioeconomic factors often amplify the caregiving burden for women. In resource-limited settings, where access to professional caregiving services is sparse or unaffordable, family members - predominantly women - become the default caregivers. This dynamic creates a cycle where caregiving responsibilities further marginalize women, restricting their access to education, formal employment, and financial independence.

The impact of these gendered caregiving roles is profound. Studies have shown that women caregivers report higher levels of stress and depression compared to their male counterparts. They are also more likely to experience physical health issues stemming from prolonged caregiving, such as chronic fatigue and musculoskeletal problems. These disparities highlight the urgent need for culturally sensitive policies and interventions that recognize and address the unique challenges faced by female caregivers. Breaking the cycle of gendered caregiving requires a multifaceted approach. Public awareness campaigns can challenge traditional norms and promote a more equitable distribution of caregiving responsibilities. Policies that provide financial assistance, mental health support, and flexible work arrangements for caregivers are critical. Additionally, governments and organizations must prioritize the development of professional caregiving services to reduce the reliance on unpaid family members.

Caregiving should not be viewed as a gendered expectation but as a societal responsibility. Recognizing and addressing the intersection of gender and caregiving is not only essential for alleviating caregiver burden but also for fostering equality and creating more supportive healthcare systems. By challenging entrenched norms and implementing targeted interventions, we can ensure that caregiving is a shared responsibility that does not disproportionately disadvantage women.

WHY SHOULD SOCIETY CARE ABOUT CAREGIVERS?

The health of caregivers is not a private matter. It is a public health issue with far-reaching implications for patients, families, and society at large. Caregivers serve as an indispensable part of the healthcare ecosystem, often bridging the gap between medical treatment and long-term care. When caregivers experience burnout, their ability to provide effective and compassionate support diminishes, which directly impacts patient outcomes. A stressed or unwell caregiver may struggle to ensure medication adherence, attend medical appointments, or provide the emotional reassurance critical to a patient’s recovery. Consequently, the ripple effect of caregiver burnout can undermine the success of even the most advanced medical interventions.

Beyond its impact on individual households, caregiver health also affects workforce participation and economic productivity. Many caregivers balance their responsibilities with paid employment, often at great personal cost. The financial strain of caregiving, combined with the physical and emotional toll, frequently leads to career disruptions, reduced work hours, or job loss. These factors not only jeopardize the financial security of caregivers but also reduce overall economic productivity. Studies have found that caregiver stress significantly contributes to healthcare costs, as burned-out caregivers are more likely to require medical attention themselves[8]. This dual burden, caring for a loved one while managing one’s own health, creates a cycle of strain that affects both personal and public resources.

Investing in caregiver support is not just an ethical imperative, it is also a sound economic strategy. Caregivers provide an estimated 470 billion dollars’ worth of unpaid labor annually in the United States alone, a figure that underscores their critical role in sustaining the healthcare system[2]. By implementing targeted interventions such as respite care, financial assistance, and mental health resources, society can help alleviate caregiver burdens and enhance their ability to perform this vital role. These relatively low-cost measures can yield high returns in the form of improved caregiver and patient outcomes, reduced healthcare expenditures, and a more stable and productive workforce. Moreover, supporting caregivers aligns with broader societal values of equity and compassion. Many caregivers take on their role out of necessity rather than choice, driven by familial duty and love. However, their contributions often go unrecognized, leaving them isolated and unsupported. This lack of acknowledgment not only perpetuates their struggles but also reflects poorly on society’s commitment to collective well-being.

A shift in perspective is urgently needed. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and employers must begin to view caregiver health as an integral part of public health. This includes creating comprehensive caregiver support programs, integrating caregiver well-being into healthcare plans, and fostering workplace policies that accommodate caregiving responsibilities. Public awareness campaigns can also play a crucial role in destigmatizing caregiver struggles and encouraging community-based support networks. Caring for caregivers is not a peripheral issue; it is central to building a resilient and compassionate society. Recognizing the value of caregivers and providing them with the tools and resources they need to thrive will not only improve individual lives but also strengthen the social and economic fabric of our communities. Society cannot afford to neglect this invisible workforce; their well-being is intrinsically tied to the health and prosperity of all.

CAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS AFFORD TO IGNORE CAREGIVERS?

Healthcare systems have been slow to adapt to the reality of caregiver needs. Current models are overwhelmingly patient-centered, with little attention given to the broader caregiving ecosystem. This gap is particularly glaring in transplant care. While multidisciplinary teams are now standard practice in transplant units, their focus remains primarily on patients. Expanding this model to include caregiver support - psychological counseling, training on medical tasks, and social work assistance - could transform outcomes for both patients and families[9,10].

Countries like the United Kingdom have started to recognize this. Programs such as those offered by the National Health Service provide financial allowances and training programs for caregivers, recognizing them as integral to the healthcare system. These programs can serve as models for other nations, particularly in resource-limited settings where caregiving often doubles as economic support[11]. A paradigm shift toward family-centered care requires more than advocacy—it demands actionable policies that support caregivers at every stage of transplantation. High-resource countries like the United Kingdom and the United States offer successful models that can inform global strategies.

Financial assistance programs acknowledge the economic burden of caregiving. The United Kingdom’s Carer’s Allowance provides direct financial aid to those dedicating significant time to caregiving, while in the United States, Medicaid’s Self-Directed Services programs allow patients to allocate funds to compensate family caregivers. These initiatives recognize caregiving as essential labor, alleviating financial strain and reinforcing its value within healthcare systems.

Caregiver education and training have also proven beneficial. Leading United States transplant centers, including Mayo Clinic and Johns Hopkins, have developed structured training programs covering medication management, infection prevention, and post-transplant rehabilitation. Equipping caregivers with these skills reduces preventable complications and improves patient outcomes. Psychological and emotional support is another critical yet often overlooked component. The United Kingdom’s National Health Service Mental Health and Well-being Hubs provide counseling, peer support, and stress management resources for caregivers. Similarly, the American Liver Foundation offers virtual support groups and helplines, addressing the long-term emotional toll of caregiving.

Extended post-transplant monitoring is key to sustaining caregiver well-being. Some US hospitals integrate caregiver check-ins within post-transplant follow-ups, identifying burnout risks and ensuring sustained support. Expanding such programs worldwide through digital training, telemedicine counseling, and tax incentives could make caregiver support more accessible across diverse healthcare systems. Follow ups by telephone, video calling, outreach clinics and other remote services can also help ease the burden. By adopting these proven strategies, liver transplant programs can transition from patient-centered to truly family-centered care, ensuring that both patients and caregivers receive the support they need for long-term success.

ARE CAREGIVERS THE ETHICAL FRONTIER OF HEALTHCARE?

The inclusion of caregivers in healthcare outcomes is not merely operational, it is an ethical imperative. Caregivers form an invisible backbone of the healthcare system, stepping in to provide critical support where formal healthcare services often fall short. However, they do so not out of professional obligation but out of necessity, with their roles frequently determined by circumstance rather than choice. Whether it is a spouse caring for a partner, a child looking after a parent, or a sibling stepping in, caregivers find themselves in a position of profound responsibility, often with little preparation or external support.

A system that ignores the needs of caregivers effectively penalizes them for fulfilling a societal necessity. Caregiving can come at a significant personal cost - financial, emotional, and physical. Caregivers are often forced to sacrifice their own well-being, careers, and social lives to meet the needs of their loved ones. This trade-off is particularly stark in cultures where caregiving is seen as an inherent familial duty rather than a societal responsibility. When these sacrifices are met with systemic neglect, it reflects a failure to uphold the ethical principle of justice in healthcare - a principle that emphasizes fairness and the equitable distribution of burdens and benefits. Addressing caregiver health is not merely about easing individual burdens but about affirming their humanity and indispensable role in the healthcare ecosystem. Caregivers are not adjuncts to the patient’s journey; they are co-navigators whose well-being is inextricably linked to patient outcomes. Recognizing and supporting caregivers is a moral obligation that extends beyond healthcare to the broader fabric of society. It is a commitment to ensuring that no one is left behind - not the patient and not the person dedicating their life to their care.

The ethical argument for supporting caregivers becomes even more pressing when viewed through the lens of equity. Caregiving responsibilities disproportionately fall on women, low-income families, and marginalized groups, exacerbating existing social and economic disparities. By failing to support caregivers, society reinforces these inequities, placing the heaviest burdens on those least equipped to bear them. An ethical healthcare system must address these disparities, providing targeted support that accounts for the varied experiences and challenges of caregivers from diverse backgrounds. Incorporating caregiver well-being into healthcare systems is not a theoretical exercise, it is a practical necessity. This can include systemic measures such as integrating caregiver assessments into patient care plans, offering mental health services tailored to caregiver needs, and providing financial incentives or tax breaks to offset caregiving costs. At the policy level, nations must recognize caregivers as stakeholders in healthcare, ensuring that their rights and well-being are safeguarded through legislation and public health programs. Caregivers are the ethical frontier of healthcare because their inclusion challenges us to expand our understanding of care itself. A truly compassionate and equitable healthcare system cannot limit its focus to the patient; it must extend its scope to include those who ensure that care continues beyond the hospital walls. By prioritizing caregiver health, we not only honor their sacrifices but also strengthen the moral foundation of healthcare, ensuring that it serves all who contribute to its success. The question is no longer whether we can afford to support caregivers, it is whether we can afford not to.

HOW DO WE BUILD A CAREGIVER-CENTERED HEALTHCARE MODEL?

The evidence is undeniable: caregivers are an indispensable part of the healthcare ecosystem, yet their needs are often overlooked. Caregivers provide critical support that bridges the gap between medical intervention and long-term recovery. However, this essential role frequently comes at a personal cost - financial, emotional, and physical. Addressing this gap requires a fundamental shift in perspective. Healthcare systems must evolve from being patient-centered to family-centered, integrating caregiver support as a key component of care delivery. This transformation will not happen overnight, but meaningful progress has already begun. Research, such as the study by Virches et al[3], sheds light on the often-invisible burdens caregivers bear. It also emphasizes the ripple effects of addressing these burdens, not only improving caregivers' well-being but also enhancing patient outcomes. By supporting caregivers, we also uplift patients, reduce healthcare costs, and foster a more compassionate system.

CONCLUSON

As medical advancements continue to extend life and improve health, it is vital to recognize the people who make these successes possible - not just the doctors, nurses, or patients, but the caregivers who provide the daily, unseen labor of love. Their well-being is integral to the effectiveness and humanity of healthcare. It is not enough to extend life; we must also ensure that life after major interventions like transplantation is better for everyone involved. To neglect caregivers is to undermine the very foundations of holistic and sustainable healthcare. Let us act now to ensure that caregivers are seen, supported, and celebrated.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Transplantation

Country of origin: India

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade C, Grade C, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Ji FW; Li ZP S-Editor: Bai Y L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Yu HG

References
1.  Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA. 1999;282:2215-2219.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2237]  [Cited by in RCA: 2090]  [Article Influence: 80.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Reinhard SC, Caldera S, Houser A, Choula R.   Valuing the Invaluable 2023 Update: Strengthening Supports for Family Caregivers. Mar 8, 2023. [cite 13 December 2024]. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/ltss/family-caregiving/valuing-the-invaluable-2015-update/.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Virches A, Claudino MB, Miyazaki MC, Miyazaki ET, Silva RF, Silva RC, Farias HB, Domingos NA, Santos Jr R, Fucuta PS. Burden, stress and depression in caregivers of cirrhosis patients before and after liver transplantation. World J Transplant. 2025;15:102003.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Volk ML. Burden of Cirrhosis on Patients and Caregivers. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4:1107-1111.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Åberg F. Quality of life after liver transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;46-47:101684.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Young AL, Rowe IA, Absolom K, Jones RL, Downing A, Meader N, Glaser A, Toogood GJ. The effect of Liver Transplantation on the quality of life of the recipient's main caregiver - a systematic review. Liver Int. 2017;37:794-801.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ervin J, Taouk Y, Alfonzo LF, Hewitt B, King T. Gender differences in the association between unpaid labour and mental health in employed adults: a systematic review. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e775-e786.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Henson JB, Cabezas M, McElroy LM, Muir AJ. Rates of employment after liver transplant: A nationwide cohort study. Hepatol Commun. 2023;7:e0061.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Domingos MF, Coelho JCU, Nogueira IR, Parolin MB, Matias JEF, De Freitas ACT, Zeni Neto C, Ramos EJB. Quality of Life after 10 Years of Liver Transplantation. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020;29:611-616.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
10.  Lai JC, Ufere NN, Bucuvalas JC. Liver Transplant Survivorship. Liver Transpl. 2020;26:1030-1033.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Pedroso TG, Araújo ADS, Santos MTS, Galera SAF, Cardoso L. Caregiver burden and stress in psychiatric hospital admission. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72:1699-1706.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]