Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Psychiatr. Sep 22, 2016; 6(3): 381-390
Published online Sep 22, 2016. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i3.381
Published online Sep 22, 2016. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i3.381
Table 1 Assesment of psychopathology
| Raw scores | |
| PANSS positive | 23 |
| P1: Delusions | 6 |
| P6: Suspiciousness/persecution | 6 |
| PANSS negative | 17 |
| PANSS general psychopathology | 37 |
| PSYRATS delusions | 21 |
| PSYRATS hallucinations | 33 |
| BDI-II | 32 |
Table 2 Main significant measures of the repertory grid of James
| Self-construing | Cognitive structure | ||
| Self-ideal distance | 0.5 | PVAFF | 54.11% |
| Self-others distance | 0.4 | Polarization | 60.53% |
| Ideal-others distance | 0.25 |
- Citation: García-Mieres H, Ochoa S, Salla M, López-Carrilero R, Feixas G. Understanding the paranoid psychosis of James: Use of the repertory grid technique for case conceptualization. World J Psychiatr 2016; 6(3): 381-390
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v6/i3/381.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v6.i3.381