Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Psychiatr. Mar 22, 2015; 5(1): 138-146
Published online Mar 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i1.138
Published online Mar 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i1.138
Table 1 Characteristics of the participants in the two groups n (%)
Variable | African-Americans (n = 51) | Caucasians (n = 27) | P-value1 |
Age, yr, mean ± SD | 43.1 (10.3) | 47.0 (10.1) | 0.11 |
Gender male | 19 (37.3) | 14 (51.9) | 0.21 |
Bipolar II diagnosis | 2 (3.9) | 1 (3.7) | 0.96 |
Education: High school or less | 26 (52.0) | 7 (25.9) | 0.03 |
Marital status | |||
Married or cohabiting | 7 (14.0) | 5 (18.5) | 0.42 |
Widowed, divorced, or separated | 12 (24.0) | 11 (40.8) | 0.19 |
Never married | 31 (62.0) | 11 (40.7) | 0.15 |
Table 2 Comparison of pretreatment and post-treatment depression scores
Variable | African-Americans | Caucasians | P-value1 |
Pre-treatment mood scores | (n = 51) | (n = 27) | |
SIGH-SAD, mean ± SD | 33 (6.9) | 31 (6.4) | 0.22 |
BDI-II, mean ± SD | 25 (10.9) | 23.6 (8.4) | 0.58 |
Post-treatment mood scores | (n = 41) | (n = 24) | |
SIGH-SAD, mean ± SD | 9.31 (6.9) | 6.79 (6.0) | 0.15 |
BDI-II, mean ± SD | 9 (7.9) | 7.3 (7.4) | 0.41 |
Table 3 Response, remission, and depression score changes by groups
Variable | African-Americans (n = 41) | Caucasians (n = 24) | P-value1 |
Response, 50% reduction SIGH-SAD, n (%) | 33 (80.5) | 20 (83.3) | 0.78 |
Remission, SIGH-SAD < 8, n (%) | 19 (46.3) | 18 (75.0) | 0.02 |
SIGH-SAD, % change, mean ± SD | -70.4 (22.7) | 76.0 (22.6) | 0.34 |
BDI-II, % change, mean ± SD | -61.8 (32.2) | -68.1 (32.9) | 0.46 |
POMS-A, % change, mean ± SD | -46.6 (46.7) | -46.8 (48.8) | 0.98 |
POMS-D, % change, mean ± SD | -52.7 (47.1) | -49.2 (54.9) | 0.78 |
Treatment days missed, mean ± SD | 8.7 (11.0) | 7.4 (8.3) | 0.61 |
Percent adherence, mean ± SD | 79.4 (26.2) | 82.4 (19.7) | 0.61 |
Table 4 Adjusted mean changes in depression score outcomes in African-Americans and Caucasians, adjusted for adherence, age, education and gender
Variable | African-Americans (n = 41) | Caucasians (n=24) | P-value1 |
Mood scale | |||
SIGH-SAD | -22.9 (1.6) | -25.2 (2.1) | 0.41 |
BDI-II | -16.6 (2.0) | -16.4 (2.6) | 0.95 |
Table 5 Sensitivity analysis including all participants n (%)
African-Americans (n = 51) | Caucasians (n = 27) | P-value1 | |
Remission, SIGH-SAD ≤ 8 | 19 (37.3) | 18 (66.7) | 0.01 |
Treatment days missed, mean ± SD | 11.3 (13.9) | 7.4 (8.3) | 0.13 |
Percent adherence, mean ± SD | 73.2 (33.1) | 82.4 (19.7) | 0.13 |
-
Citation: Uzoma HN, Reeves GM, Langenberg P, Khabazghazvini B, Balis TG, Johnson MA, Sleemi A, Scrandis DA, Zimmerman SA, Vaswani D, Nijjar GV, Cabassa J, Lapidus M, Rohan KJ, Postolache TT. Light treatment for seasonal Winter depression in African-American
vs Caucasian outpatients. World J Psychiatr 2015; 5(1): 138-146 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v5/i1/138.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v5.i1.138