Catthoor K, Schrijvers D, Hutsebaut J, Feenstra D, Persoons P, Hert MD, Peuskens J, Sabbe B. Associative stigma in family members of psychotic patients in Flanders: An exploratory study. World J Psychiatr 2015; 5(1): 118-125 [PMID: 25815261 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i1.118]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Kirsten Catthoor, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatrisch Ziekenhuis Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, B2060 Antwerpen, Belgium. kirstencatthoor@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Psychiatry
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Psychiatr. Mar 22, 2015; 5(1): 118-125 Published online Mar 22, 2015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i1.118
Table 1 Socio-demographic data of patient and respondent, and schematic representation of the patient’s case history n = 150 (%)
Diagnosis
Schizophrenia/schizo-affective disorder
129 (86.0)/21 (14.0)
Treatment
Inpatient/outpatient
81 (54.0)/69 (46.0)
Gender of patient
Male/female
103 (68.7)/47 (31.3)
Average age of patient (SD)
33 yr (8.7 yr)
Gender of respondent
Male/female
46 (30.7)/104 (69.3)
Relationship respondent/patient
Parent/partner
118 (78.7)/32 (21.3)
Average age of respondent (SD)
56 yr (11.9 yr)
Education of respondent
A-Level, FE or University/primary or GCSE (O-Level)
74 (49.3)/76 (50.7)
Total household income of respondent
< €20K per annum/ > €20K per annum
122 (81.4)/28 (18.6)
Number of contact hours respondent/patient (SD)
5.4 h (1.8 h)
Duration of illness in years (SD)
9.1 yr (6.4 yr)
Number of times patient was taken into care (SD)
3.8 (3.2)
Psychopharmacological treatment
With/without antipsychotic drugs
148 (98.6)/2 (1.4)
Behaviour
Disorganised/not disorganised
132 (88.0)/18 (12.0)
Negative/not negative
44 (29.3)/106 (70.7)
Patient’s place of residence
At home/in institution
117 (78.0)/33 (22.0)
Table 2 Complete results of stigmatization questionnaire, ordered by item n = 150 (%)
Never
Sometimes
Regularly
Often
Concerned about the neighbours
121 (80.7)
20 (13.3)
5 (3.3)
4 (2.7)
Concerned about people discovering what is going on
106 (70.7)
33 (22.0)
4 (2.6)
7 (4.7)
Tendency to conceal
89 (59.3)
38 (25.3)
11 (7.3)
12 (8.0)
Explanation about the situation
71 (47.3)
60 (40.0)
13 (8.7)
6 (4.0)
Secrecy
95 (63.3)
32 (21.3)
6 (4.0)
17 (11.3)
Concerned about being avoided or ignored
136 (90.7)
11 (7.3)
1 (0.7)
2 (1.3)
Explanation of the illness
106 (70.7)
26 (17.3)
11 (7.3)
7 (4.7)
Concerned about being accused
129 (86.0)
13 (8.7)
5 (3.3)
3 (2.0)
Concerned about a hesitation to marry
122 (81.3)
15 (10.0)
7 (4.7)
6 (4.0)
Concerned about leaving the house
120 (80.0)
24 (16.0)
3 (2.0)
3 (2.0)
Shame
129 (86.0)
19 (12.7)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.3)
Contact with other families
103 (68.7)
34 (22.7)
6 (4.0)
7 (4.6)
Feeling depressed or sad
55 (36.7)
44 (29.3)
25 (16.7)
26 (17.3)
Guilt
118 (78.7)
22 (14.7)
7 (4.6)
3 (2.0)
Table 3 Differences in subjective stigmatization experience taking into account patient- and respondent-specific variables with the relevant P-value
Patient- and respondent-specific variables
Stigmatization-score (± SD)
P-value
Relation
Parent/partner
6.4 (± 0.5)/4.9 (± 1.1)
0.030
Evolution of relation
Worse/not worse
8.6 (± 1.1)/5.3 (± 0.5)
0.003
Disruptive
Yes/no
8.1 (± 1.1)/5.7 (± 0.5)
0.020
Nature of patient
Inpatient/outpatient
6.8 (± 0.6)/5.3 (± 0.7)
0.043
Disruption to family members
Yes/no
9.6 (± 1.5)/5.5 (± 0.5)
0.004
Patient’s residence
Institution/at home
8.9 (± 1.1)/5.3 (± 0.5)
0.001
Attribution to heredity
Yes/no
7.4 (± 0.7)/4.8 (± 0.5)
0.006
Attribution to character
Yes/no
7.4 (± 0.7)/4.8 (± 0.5)
0.008
Attribution to biological brain problem
Yes/no
7.1 (± 0.8)/5.6 (± 0.6)
0.050
Contact with psychotherapist
Yes/no
6.8 (± 0.6)/4.5 (± 0.5)
0.060
Table 4 Predictors of stigma experienced by family members of psychotic patients (n = 89)
β
t
P-value
Constant
0.999
0.321
Gender of patient
0.072
0.648
0.519
Relation with patient
0.025
0.194
0.847
Education of family member
-0.013
-0.11
0.913
Age of patient
-0.238
-1.595
0.115
Number of years of illness
0.109
0.714
0.477
Number of hospital admissions
-0.033
-0.26
0.796
Positive psychotic symptom: hallucinations
0.204
1.827
0.072
Positive psychotic symptom: paranoia
0.134
1.283
0.203
Burden by housemates
0.223
2.074
0.041
Family income
0.062
0.526
0.601
Spoken to therapist
0.173
1.578
0.119
Biological background of illness: inheritability
0.19
1.716
0.09
Biological background of illness: bad biological functioning
0.005
0.044
0.965
Citation: Catthoor K, Schrijvers D, Hutsebaut J, Feenstra D, Persoons P, Hert MD, Peuskens J, Sabbe B. Associative stigma in family members of psychotic patients in Flanders: An exploratory study. World J Psychiatr 2015; 5(1): 118-125