Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng.
World J Psychiatr. Jun 22, 2013; 3(2): 41-49
Published online Jun 22, 2013. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v3.i2.41
Table 1 Basic characteristics of the sample n (%)
Characteristicn = 67
Gender
Male29 (43.3)
Female38 (56.7)
Marital status
Single25 (37.3)
Married32 (47.8)
Divorced/widowed10 (14.9)
Employment status
Employed38 (58.2)
Unemployed28 (41.8)
Age (yr), mean ± SD44.5 ± 15.3
Education (yr), mean ± SD13.9 ± 2.5
BDI, mean ± SD11.9 ± 6.2
Q-LES-Q, mean ± SD44.2 ± 8.0
Table 2 Beck Depression Inventory and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire scores across the attachment styles (mean ± SD)
VariableAttachment style1
ANOVA F-valueTukey post-hoc single comparisons
Secure (n = 32)Anxious/ambivalent(n = 12)Avoidant (n = 23)
BDI9.7 ± 5.414.0 ± 6.113.8 ± 6.54.13aA/A > S, A > S, A/A = A
Q-LES-Q48.5 ± 6.942.2 ± 8.441.9 ± 8.75.69bA/A < S, A < S, A/A = A
Table 3 Pearson correlations between attachment styles and Beck Depression Inventory and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire scores
VariableQuality of lifeDepression
Secure10.197-0.202
Anxious/ambivalent1-0.387b0.401d
Avoidant1-0.2110.191
Depression-0.427b1.000
Table 4 Regression model for predicting health-related quality of life from attachment styles and depression severity
Independent variablesβt-value(β= 0)P valueTotal % variance accounting for
Predictors
Anxious/ambivalent attachment-0.253.56< 0.00121.4
BDI-0.637.51< 0.000129.7
Excluded variables
Gender0.010.020.99--
Marital status0.070.930.35--
Employment0.020.910.31--