Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng.
World J Psychiatr. Feb 22, 2012; 2(1): 1-12
Published online Feb 22, 2012. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i1.1
Table 1 List of graph theoretical studies in schizophrenia
StudyMethodParameters
2006: Micheloyannis et al[61]EEGC, L, SWN
2008: Basset et al[17]MRI, MEGSWN, efficiency
2008: Liu et al[67]fMRIC, L, Eloc, Eglob, K, SWN
2009: Rubinov et al[64]EEGC, L, SWN
2009: Basset et al[66]MEGCost efficiency
2010: Wang et al[77]fMRISWN, efficiency
2010: van den Heuvel et al[40]DTIC, L, SWN
2010: De Vico Fallani et al[62]EEGNetwork density, degree
2010: Lynall et al[68]fMRISWN, efficiency, hierarchy, degree dist, connectivity strength and diversity
2010: Alexander-Bloch et al[69]fMRIModularity
2011: Jalili et al[65]EEGDegree, node strength, SWN, Eglob, modularity, centrality
2011: Zalesky et al[70]DTISWN, nodal degree, C, L, efficiency
2011: Fornito et al[25]fMRIC, L, SWN, efficiency
2011: Yu et al[71]fMRIC, L, Eloc, Eglob, SWN
2011: Lord et al[79]fMRIBetweenness centrality, degree centrality, L
2011: Weiss et al[86]MEGNetwork cost
2011: Yu et al[78]fMRIK, C, L, Eglob, Eloc
2011: Wang et al[75]DTISWN, Cost, Eloc, Eglob
2012: Ma et al[72]fMRIC, L, centrality
2012: He et al[76]fMRIK, C, L, Eloc, Eglob
2012: Alexander-Bloch et al[74]fMRIModularity
2012: Alexander-Bloch et al[73]MRINetwork connection distance
2012: Shi et al[80]MRI, DTISWN, modularity, centrality, connection distance