Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2025; 15(4): 102672
Published online Apr 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.102672
Table 1 Distribution of total scores of nurses on the Mental Health Literacy Scale, Holistic Nursing Competence Scale and Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale (n = 261)
Scale total score averages (minimum-maximum)
mean ± SD
Mental Health Literacy Scale (52-141)95.88 ± 11.67
Holistic Nursing Competence Scale (36-252)179.46 ± 33.82
Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale (16-80)64.79 ± 11.24
Table 2 Differences between nurses’ descriptive characteristics and total mean scores of the Mental Health Literacy Scale, Holistic Nursing Competence Scale and Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale (n = 261)
Characteristics
    MHLS
HNCS
NPSES
Age (years), mean ± SD
24-392.77 ± 0.336.14 ± 1.206.14 ± 1.20
39-542.67 ± 0.326.27 ± 1.106.27 ± 1.10
Student t-test; P valuet = 2.253; P = 0.025t = -0.864; P = 0.388t = -0.864; P = 0.388
Gender, mean ± SD
Female2.72 ± 0.316.20 ± 1.176.20 ± 1.17
Male2.85 ± 0.436.08 ± 1.146.08 ± 1.14
Student t-test; P valuet = -2.06; P = 0.040t = 0.503; P = 0.615t = 0.503; P = 0.615
Last school graduated, mean ± SD
VSH/AS2.67 ± 0.505.91 ± 1.163.67 ± 0.90
Bachelor’s degree2.73 ± 0.296.21 ± 1.164.09 ± 0.65
Master’s degree2.90 ± 0.42    6.29 ± 1.164.02 ± 0.78
Analysis of variation test; P valueF = 2.029; P = 0.134F = 0.833; P = 0.436F = 4.488; P = 0.012
Post-hoc--VSH/AS < bachelor’s degree
Working time (years), mean ± SD
1-112.79 ± 0.345.91 ± 1.164.06 ± 0.69
12-212.73 ± 0.276.21 ± 1.163.51 ± 1.06
22-31    2.66 ± 0.33    6.29 ± 1.163.89 ± 0.88
Analysis of variation test; P valueF = 3.792; P = 0.024F = 0.833; P = 0.436F = 1.390; P = 0.251
Post-hoc22-31 < 1-11--
Is a holistic approach important in nursing?
Yes3.57 ± 0.006.18 ± 1.164.09 ± 0.63
No2.73 ± 0.335.93 ± 0.003.99 ± 0.76
Student t-test; P valuet = -2.525; P = 0.012t = 0.221; P = 0.826t = 1.130; P = 0.260
How does nurses’ knowledge of mental illnesses affect their holistic nursing approaches?
Positive impact2.73 ± 0.336.21 ± 1.164.06 ± 0.68
Negative impact2.95 ± 0.535.57 ± 1.012.87 ± 1.02
It has no effect3.50 ± 0.195.73 ± 0.833.99 ± 0.82
Analysis of variation test; P valueF = 1.156; P = 0.316F = 2.586; P = 0.077F = 4.396; P = 0.013
Post-hoc--Negative impact < positive impact
Table 3 Relationship between total mean scores of nurses on the Mental Health Literacy Scale, Holistic Nursing Competence Scale and Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale (n = 261)
Scalesr or P valueMHLS
HNCS
NPSES
MHLSr10.143a0.135a
P-0.0210.030
HNCSr-10.373a
P--0.000
NPSESr--1
P---
Table 4 Effects of mental health literacy levels of nurses on holistic nursing competencies and nursing profession self-efficacy, and the effects of holistic nursing competencies on nursing profession self-efficacy (n = 261)
Dependent variable
Independent variable
Non-standardized coefficients
β
t
P value
R2
Adj. R2
F
HNCSConstant166.737-9.5220.000a0.0020.0030.541
MHLS0.1330.0460.7350.000a---
NPSESConstant52.344-9.1030.000a0.0180.0144.758
MHLS0.1300.1352.1810.000a---
NPSESConstant42.530-12.1530.000a0.139-41.686
HNCS0.1240.3736.4560.000a-0.136-