Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2025; 15(4): 102215
Published online Apr 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.102215
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Ref.
Sample size
Age, mean ± SD
IQ score, mean ± SD
MRI equipment and field strength
Method
Differential brain region
Corrective methods
Quality
ADHD
HCs
Patient
HCs
Patient
HCs
Cao et al[9], 2006292713.34 ± 1.4413.08 ± 0.93101.22 ± 10.10115.83 ± 11.58Siemens Trio Tim 3.0TReHo14Alphasim4/1/1
Zang et al[10], 2007131213.0 ± 1.413.1 ± 0.699.0 ± 11.6118 ± 11.7Siemens Trio 3.0TALFF11Puncor < 0.014/1/1
Cao et al[11], 2008121313.40 ± 1.7013.20 ± 1.20102.70 ± 9.00112.70 ± 13.80Siemens Trio Tim 3.0TN/A10N/A4/1/1
Yang et al[12], 201130339.20 ± 1.99.4 ± 1.2101.30 ± 3.20104.90 ± 10.10Siemens Trio Tim 3.0TfALFF11Puncor < 0.014/1/1
Wu et al[13], 201232309.20 ± 1.709.40 ± 1.20≥ 80≥ 80Siemens Trio Tim 3.0TALFF10N/A4/1/1
An et al[14], 2013192313.30 ± 1.4013.20 ± 1.00102.70 ± 10.40113.50 ± 12.80Siemens Trio Tim 3.0TALFF/ReHo11/18Alphasim4/1/1
Wang et al[15], 2014575911.70 ± 2.6012.20 ± 2.90106.40 ± 15.50113.70 ± 14.60Siemens Allegra 30TALFF7Alphasim4/1/1
Yang et al[16], 201318188.80 ± 0.709.90 ± 0.9095.77 ± 10.79100.93 ± 8.33GE Discovery MR750 3.0TALFF/ReHo4/8Alphasim4/1/1
Li et al[17], 2014333210.10 ± 2.6010.90 ± 2.60N/AN/AN/AN/A5FWE4/1/1
Yu et al[18], 2016303010.30 ± 1.7010.20 ± 1.70106.20 ± 14.50121. 10 ± 13.90N/AReHo5Alphasim4/1/1
Xie et al[19], 2016101010.40 ± 2.6010.40 ± 2.60≥ 80≥ 80GE 1.5TALFF5N/A4/1/1
Wang et al[20], 2017384211.00 ± 2.0011.00 ± 2.00≥ 80≥ 80SIEMENS TRIO 3.0TfALFF6Alphasim4/1/1
Zhou et al[21], 201845268.49 ± 1.879.04 ± 1.56114.00 ± 13.27121.00 ± 13.87GE Signa HDX 3.0TReHo1FWE4/1/1
Lou et al[22], 202150288.26 ± 1.938.93 ± 1.46116.94 ± 17.45122.43 ± 13.84GE Signa HDX 3.0TdALFF2GRF4/1/1
Feng et al[23], 2023525110.17 ± 1.8110.64 ± 1.85105.38 ± 13.57123.81 ± 16.32GE Discovery MR750 3.0TALFF/ReHo3/1GRF4/1/1
Table 2 Applying the activation likelihood estimation method to study changes in brain function activity in adolescent attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Research methods
Anatomical label
Brodmann areas
Peak MNI coordinate
ALE value
Volume in mm3
X
Y
Z
ReHo & ALFF/dALFF/fALFF IncreaseLING_RBA 1816-82-40.006502583592
LING_LBA 18-12-92-80.005300413160
CUN_RBA 2312-74160.00478810932
ReHo & ALFF/dALFF/fALFF decreaseMFG_LBA 924880.006200704960
PCUN_LBA 31-4-46360.00574992456
Table 3 Jackknife sensitivity analyses
Discarded article
Adolescent ADHD > HC
LING_R
LING_L
CUN_R
Cao et al[9], 2006NoNoNo
Zang et al[10], 2007YesYesYes
Yang et al[12], 2011yesyesyes
Wu et al[13], 2012YesYesYes
An et al[14], 2013NoNoNo
Wang et al[15], 2014YesYesYes
Yang et al[16], 2013YesYesYes
Li et al[17], 2014YesYesYes
Yu et al[18], 2016YesYesYes
Xie et al[19], 2016YesYesYes
Wang et al[20], 2017YesYesYes
Lou et al[22], 2021YesYesYes
Feng et al[23], 2023YesYesYes
Total11 out of 1311 out of 1311 out of 13
Table 4 Jackknife sensitivity analyses
Discarded articleAdolescent ADHD < HC
MFG_L
PCUN_L
Cao et al[9], 2006YesYes
Zang et al[10], 2007YesYes
Cao et al[11], 2008YesYes
Yang et al[12], 2011NoNo
Wu et al[13], 2012NoNo
An et al[14], 2013NoYes
Wang et al[15], 2014YesYes
Yang et al[16], 2013YesYes
Li et al[17], 2014YesYes
Yu et al[18], 2016YesNo
Wang et al[20], 2017YesYes
Zhou et al[21], 2018YesYes
Lou et al[22], 2021YesYes
Feng et al[23], 2023YesYes
Total11 out of 1411 out of 14