Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2025; 15(4): 100819
Published online Apr 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.100819
Table 1 General data of the better and poor resilience groups, n (%)
Data
Better resilience group (n = 80)
Poor resilience group (n = 108)
χ2
P value
Gender5.1130.024
Male (n = 114)56 (70.00)58 (53.70)
Female (n = 74)24 (30.00)50 (46.30)
Age (years)4.5160.034
< 40 (n = 85)29 (36.25)56 (51.85)
≥ 40 (n = 103)51 (63.75)52 (48.15)
Cause of injury1.0860.581
Traffic accident (n = 105)45 (56.25)60 (55.56)
Falling from heights (n = 54)25 (31.25)29 (26.85)
Others (n = 29)10 (12.50)19 (17.59)
Severity of trauma6.5210.038
Minor injury (n = 71)38 (47.50)33 (30.56)
Serious injury (n = 46)19 (23.75)27 (25.00)
Critical injury (n = 71)23 (28.75)48 (44.44)
Fracture site1.2520.535
Tibial shaft fracture (n = 59)22 (27.50)37 (34.26)
Radius fracture (n = 70)30 (37.50)40 (37.04)
Humeral fracture (n = 59)28 (35.00)31 (28.70)
Personality7.3150.007
Extroversion (n = 73)40 (50.00)33 (30.56)
Introversion (n = 115)40 (50.00)75 (69.44)
Table 2 Assignment
Factor
Variable
Assignment
GenderX1Male = 0, female = 1
Age (years old)X2< 40 = 0, ≥ 40 = 1
Cause of injuryX3Traffic accident = 0, falling from heights = 1, others = 2
Trauma severityX4Minor injury = 0, serious injury = 1, critical injury = 2
Fracture siteX5Tibial shaft fracture = 0, radius fracture = 1, humeral fracture = 2
PersonalityX6Extroversion = 0, introversion = 1
PSQI (points)X7Continuous variable
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of psychological resilience in patients with traumatic fractures
Factor
β
SE
Wald
P value
OR
95%CI
Gender0.7420.3723.9850.0462.1001.014-4.351
Age (years)-0.7900.3694.5780.0320.4540.220-0.936
Cause of injury0.0720.2470.0840.7721.0740.662-1.745
Trauma severity0.5850.2117.6820.0061.7951.187-2.713
Fracture site-0.3410.2272.2470.1340.7110.456-1.110
Personality0.9350.3736.2750.0122.5471.226-5.292
PSQI-0.3150.05928.888< 0.0010.7300.651-0.819