Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2025; 15(4): 100289
Published online Apr 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.100289
Published online Apr 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.100289
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants
Demographic data | Anxious MDD group (n = 23) | Non-anxious MDD group (n = 30) | HC group (n = 28) | F, t, or χ2 | P value |
Age (years) | 35.57 ± 11.30 | 30.07 ± 9.91 | 31.39 ± 8.63 | 2.105 | 0.1291 |
Education level (years) | 12.91 ± 3.32 | 14.10 ± 3.87 | 13.46 ± 5.01 | 0.535 | 0.5881 |
Gender (male/female) | 23 (5/18) | 30 (10/20) | 28 (11/17) | 1.817 | 0.4032 |
Illness duration (months) | 7.64 ± 8.47 | 5.14 ± 4.22 | - | 1.402 | 0.1673 |
HAMD score | 27.48 ± 1.62 | 27.60 ± 1.52 | - | -0.281 | 0.6273 |
HAMA score | 20.96 ± 4.04 | 5.23 ± 1.28 | - | 17.990 | < 0.0013 |
Table 2 Significant degree centrality differences across groups
Cluster location | Peak (MNI) | Number of voxels | T value | ||
x | y | z | |||
Anxious MDD group vs non-anxious MDD group | |||||
Right FFG | 21 | -45 | -15 | 48 | -5.486 |
Left CAL | -18 | -57 | 6 | 88 | -5.671 |
Right CAL | 15 | -69 | 18 | 151 | -5.182 |
Anxious MDD group vs HC group | |||||
Right IOG | 39 | -63 | -12 | 43 | -5.196 |
Right FFG | 27 | -87 | -3 | 42 | -4.278 |
Left MFG | -39 | 21 | 36 | 50 | 4.211 |
Left IPAG | -54 | -51 | 42 | 36 | 4.694 |
Non-anxious MDD group vs HC group | |||||
Bilateral cerebellum IX | ± 6 | -42 | -30 | 93 | 5.125 |
Right PCu | 27 | -63 | 18 | 547 | 6.320 |
Right IFOG | 30 | 9 | 30 | 36 | 5.232 |
- Citation: Gao YJ, Meng LL, Lu ZY, Li XY, Luo RQ, Lin H, Pan ZM, Xu BH, Huang QK, Xiao ZG, Li TT, Yin E, Wei N, Liu C, Lin H. Degree centrality values in the left calcarine as a potential imaging biomarker for anxious major depressive disorder. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(4): 100289
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i4/100289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.100289