Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2025; 15(3): 102529
Published online Mar 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.102529
Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of patients according to frequency and proportion in Khartoum, Sudan, 2022
Variable

Frequency
Proportion
GenderMale19851.6%
Female18648.4%
Education levelNo formal education7820.3%
Primary14638.0%
Secondary10828.1%
University and above5213.5%
Marital statusSingle15640.6%
Married18147.1%
Divorced328.3%
Widowed153.9%
JobStudent4812.5%
Employee5514.3%
Laborer10527.3%
Not working17645.8%
Table 2 Comparing the sociodemographic characteristics of patients with and without catatonic syndrome in Khartoum, Sudan, 2022, n (%)
Variable

Patients with catatonic syndrome (n = 163)
Patients without catatonic syndrome (n = 221)
P value
SexMale76 (46.6)122 (55.2)0.999
Female87 (53.4)99 (44.4)
Education levelNo formal education41 (25.2)37 (16.7)0.099
Primary63 (38.7)83 (37.6)
Secondary37 (22.7)71 (32.1)
University22 (13.5)30 (13.6)
Marital statusSingle74 (45.4)82 (37.1)0.068
Married74 (45.4)107 (48.4)
Divorced7 (4.3)25 (11.3)
Widowed8 (4.9)7 (3.2)
JobStudent27 (16.6)21 (9.5)0.076
Employee20 (12.3)35 (15.8)
Laborer36 (22.1)69 (31.2)
Not working80 (49.1)96 (43.4)
Table 3 The prevalence of catatonic syndrome in different countries
Ref.
Country
Prevalence of catatonic syndrome using the Bush–Francis Catatonia Rating Scale
Prevalence of catatonic syndrome using manual of mental disorders, fifth edition
This studySudan42.4%27.1%
[23]Spain 39.6%-
[19]South Africa 18.3%6.6%
[13]India 16.3%5.3%
[16]Poland 8.5%5.0%
[16]Hungary8.5% 5.0%
[14]Belgium50.8%16.9%