Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2025; 15(3): 100565
Published online Mar 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100565
Published online Mar 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100565
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
Group | Number of cases | Gender (male/female, example) | Age (years old, mean ± SD) | Amount of bleeding (mL, mean ± SD) |
Observation group | 95 | 49/46 | 55.8 ± 8.0 | 62.14 ± 11.82 |
Control group | 94 | 51/43 | 59.3 ± 12.4 | 65.34 ± 13.42 |
χ2/t | 0.066 | 1.127 | 0.475 | |
P value | 0.798 | 0.228 | 0.643 |
Table 2 Comparison of anxiety status between the two groups of patients before and after treatment (mean ± SD, points)
Group | Number of cases | Before treatment | After treatment | t | P value |
Observation group | 95 | 55.44 ± 6.80 | 42.52 ± 4.92 | 14.417 | < 0.01 |
Control group | 94 | 55.40 ± 6.46 | 49.58 ± 5.48 | 6.360 | < 0.01 |
t | 1.022 | 9.471 | |||
P value | 0.306 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of depression status between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD, point)
Group | Number of cases | Before treatment | After treatment | t | P value |
Observation group | 95 | 24.38 ± 2.59 | 12.15 ± 2.37 | 35.554 | < 0.001 |
Control group | 94 | 24.29 ± 2.41 | 16.65 ± 2.19 | 21.044 | < 0.001 |
t | 0.049 | -8.086 | |||
P value | 0.962 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of cognitive function scores between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD, point)
Group | Number of cases | Before treatment | After treatment | t | P value |
Observation group | 95 | 16.96 ± 3.16 | 28.64 ± 4.07 | -20.815 | < 0.001 |
Control group | 94 | 17.09 ± 4.14 | 21.69 ± 2.56 | -9.322 | < 0.001 |
t | 0.076 | 11.393 | |||
P value | 0.940 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of quality of life between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD, point)
Group | Time | General health | Social function | Physiological functions | Mental health |
Observation group (n = 95) | Before treatment | 40.22 ± 7.31 | 50.30 ± 8.86 | 60.64 ± 8.25 | 60.88 ± 4.92 |
After treatment | 51.99 ± 9.43 | 64.49 ± 10.13 | 74.83 ± 9.51 | 74.95 ± 7.36 | |
Control group (n = 94) | Before treatment | 41.01 ± 7.34 | 50.30 ± 8.90 | 60.1 8 ± 8.25 | 60.17 ± 5.03 |
After treatment | 47.22 ± 9.51 | 57.28 ± 9.29 | 67.21 ± 9.56 | 67.31 ± 6.24 | |
Observation group value t/P value | 10.403/< 0.001 | 12.945/< 0.001 | 10.230/< 0.001 | 12.310/< 0.001 | |
Value within control group t/P value | 5.354/< 0.001 | 6.339/< 0.001 | 5.067/< 0.001 | 9.472/< 0.001 | |
The inter-group value t/P value after treatment | 2.503/0.014 | 3.678/< 0.001 | 3.938/< 0.001 | 5.575/< 0.001 |
- Citation: Shi LK, Cai XF, He JQ, Wang YH. Combined microscopic and neuroendoscopic treatment effects on psychological and cognitive outcomes in ruptured intracranial aneurysms. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(3): 100565
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i3/100565.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100565