Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2024; 14(6): 848-856
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.848
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.848
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data
Group | Sex | Age (yr) | Degree of depression | Duration of disease (yr) | ||
Male | Female | Mild | Moderate | |||
Coalition group (n = 80) | 35 | 45 | 35.33 ± 9.06 | 46 | 34 | 2.41 ± 0.69 |
Single-agent group (n = 80) | 37 | 43 | 36.16 ± 9.00 | 48 | 32 | 2.51 ± 0.72 |
χ2/t | 0.101 | -0.587 | 0.103 | -0.826 | ||
P value | 0.751 | 0.558 | 0.748 | 0.410 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the coalition and single-agent groups, n (%)
Group | Clinical control | Remarkable | Effective | Invalid | Total effective rate (%) |
Coalition group (n = 80) | 28 (35.00) | 32 (40.00) | 18 (22.50) | 2 (2.50) | 78 (97.50) |
Single-agent group (n = 80) | 18 (22.50) | 23 (28.75) | 28 (35.00) | 11 (13.75) | 69 (86.25) |
χ2 | 6.782 | ||||
P value | 0.009 |
Table 3 Comparison of neurotransmitter levels between the two groups at pre-treatment and 8 wk after treatment
Group | 5-HT (ng/mL) | DA (pg/mL) | NE (pg/mL) | |||
Pre-treatment | After 8 wk of treatment | Pre-treatment | After 8 wk of treatment | Pre-treatment | After 8 wk of treatment | |
Coalition group (n = 80) | 95.81 ± 8.35 | 130.56 ± 16.39a | 122.59 ± 13.55 | 148.57 ± 16.34a | 8.83 ± 2.41 | 14.66 ± 2.77a |
Single-agent group (n = 80) | 96.38 ± 9.05 | 119.25 ± 14.45a | 120.36 ± 12.85 | 133.55 ± 13.44a | 9.11 ± 1.96 | 12.14 ± 2.51a |
t | -0.421 | 4.628 | 1.068 | 6.354 | -0.808 | 6.017 |
P value | 0.674 | < 0.001 | 0.287 | < 0.001 | 0.420 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of oxidative stress indexes between the two groups at pre-treatment and 8 wk after treatment
Group | MDA (mmol/L) | SOD (U/mL) | ||
Pre-treatment | After 8 wk of treatment | Pre-treatment | After 8 wk of treatment | |
Coalition group (n = 80) | 12.21 ± 1.80 | 7.54 ± 1.02a | 55.55 ± 5.62 | 68.16 ± 6.75a |
Single-agent group (n = 80) | 12.09 ± 1.77 | 8.80 ± 1.31a | 55.65 ± 5.70 | 61.10 ± 5.95a |
t | 0.424 | -6.762 | -0.123 | 7.002 |
P value | 0.672 | < 0.001 | 0.902 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores between the two groups at pre-treatment and 8 wk after treatment
Table 6 Comparison of Scale for Side Effects scores between the two groups at pre-treatment and 8 wk after treatment
Group | Pre-treatment | After treatment | |||
After 2 wk | After 4 wk | After 6 wk | After 8 wk | ||
Coalition group (n = 80) | 10.75 ± 2.51 | 8.89 ± 2.39b | 8.16 ± 2.10b | 6.75 ± 2.13b | 5.11 ± 1.69b |
Single-agent group (n = 80) | 10.86 ± 2.32 | 9.85 ± 2.11a | 9.18 ± 2.03b | 7.75 ± 2.00b | 6.82 ± 1.84b |
t | -0.294 | -2.702 | -3.136 | -3.062 | -6.116 |
P value | 0.769 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.003 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Wang Y, Lu Q, Penpat I, Wu J, Abulikemu D, Zeng FC, Huang JY, Hu ZH. Clinical effect of acupuncture at ghost points combined with fluoxetine hydrochloride on mild-to-moderate depression. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(6): 848-856
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v14/i6/848.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.848