Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Jun 19, 2024; 14(6): 838-847
Published online Jun 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i6.838
Table 1 General data of patients in the poor and good prognosis groups
Data
Poor prognosis group (n = 28)
Good prognosis group (n = 92)
χ2/t
P value
Sex, n (%)0.8570.354
Male6 (21.43)28 (30.43)
Female22 (78.57)64 (69.57)
Age (mean ± SD, yr)65.72 ± 4.3966.35 ± 4.26
Body mass index (mean ± SD, kg/m2)20.13 ± 2.2920.06 ± 2.32
Complications, n (%)
Hypertension6 (21.43)20 (21.74)0.0010.972
Diabetes5 (17.86)18 (19.57)0.0400.841
Hyperlipidemia3 (10.71)15 (16.30)0.1790.672
Abnormal liver function4 (14.29)16 (17.39)0.0090.923
Fracture site, n (%)0.1860.666
left side15 (53.57)45 (48.91)
right side13 (46.43)47 (51.09)
Garden classification of FNF, n (%)12.179< 0.001
Type III5 (17.86)51 (55.43)
Type IV23 (82.14)41 (44.57)
Cause of fracture, n (%)7.4610.006
Low-energy damage5 (17.86)43 (46.74)
High-energy damage23 (82.14)49 (53.26)
FNF reduction quality, n (%)10.6450.005
Grade A8 (28.57)40 (43.48)
Grade B5 (17.86)32 (34.78)
Grade C15 (53.57)20 (21.74)
Operational conditions
Operation time (min)108.62 ± 14.39107.71 ± 15.020.2830.777
Intraoperative blood loss (mL)362.22 ± 25.68359.31 ± 23.47 0.5620.575
Intraoperative blood transfusion (mL)283.36 ± 52.47278.55 ± 55.360.4070.685
Postoperative drainage volume (mL)173.25 ± 49.62171.24 ± 51.070.1840.855
Length of hospital stay (d)21.03 ± 4.7117.03 ± 4.71 3.935< 0.001
Intraoperative hypotension0.0760.783
Yes13 (46.43)40 (43.48)
No15 (53.57)52 (56.52)
Postoperative sarcopenia0.7580.384
Yes10 (35.71)25 (27.17)
No18 (64.29)67 (72.83)
Postoperative complications0.1490.699
Yes6 (21.43)23 (25.00)
No22 (78.57)69 (75.00)
Table 2 Preoperative Symptom Checklist-90 scores of the poor and good prognosis groups
SCL-90
Poor prognosis group (n = 28)
Good prognosis group (n = 92)
t
P value
ANX27.46 ± 3.3524.17 ± 3.424.478< 0.001
DEP33.56 ± 2.3430.25 ± 2.147.011< 0.001
HOS14.03 ± 2.5114.72 ± 2.531.2660.208
IS16.12 ± 2.3716.23 ± 2.250.2240.823
OCD17.36 ± 3.5217.42 ± 3.370.0820.935
PAR16.13 ± 3.1616.24 ± 2.880.1730.863
PHOB14.11 ± 2.5814.06 ± 1.880.1120.911
PSY20.21 ± 3.4620.17 ± 3.550.0530.958
SOM22.61 ± 3.1819.23 ± 4.123.990< 0.001
Table 3 Correlation between indicators and prognosis of patients with Femoral neck fracture after surgery
Independent variables
B
SE
Wals
P value
OR (95%CI)
ANX0.3260.1534.5200.0341.385 (1.026-1.870)
DEP0.5220.1967.1140.0081.685 (1.148-2.472)
SOM0.2210.1273.0340.0821.247 (0.973-1.599)
Garden classification of FNF1.6330.7954.2260.0405.121 (1.079-24.303)
Cause of fracture3.0961.4644.4760.03422.119 (1.256-389.623)
FNF reduction quality6.9310.031
Level A2.5231.3613.4360.06412.470 (0.865-179.753)
Level B-1.6860.9742.9930.0840.185 (0.027-1.251)
Length of hospital stay0.2600.0898.5640.0031.297 (1.090-1.544)
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis
Variables
AUC
P value
95%CI
Sensitivity
Specificity
Optimum cutoff value
ANX0.742< 0.0010.641-0.8440.8570.53324.5
DEP0.854< 0.0010.760-0.9470.7860.88032.5
Garden classification of FNF0.6880.0030.582-0.7940.8210.5540.5
Cause of fracture0.6440.0210.534-0.7550.8210.4670.5
FNF reduction quality0.6480.0180.524-0.7720.5360.7832.5
Length of hospital stay0.749< 0.0010.640-0.8580.7500.76120.5
Table 5 Correlation between influence indicators and Harris score
Influence indicators

ANX
DEP
SOM
Garden classification of FNF
Cause of fracture
FNF reduction quality
Length of hospital stay
Harris scoresR-0.523-0.625-0.554-0.253-0.250-0.269-0.222
P value< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.0050.0060.0030.015
ANXR0.4550.4890.0840.1410.2050.092
P value< 0.001< 0.0010.3630.1240.0250.316
DEPR0.4950.2070.1690.2190.148
P value< 0.0010.0230.0650.0160.107
SOMR0.1580.0800.2020.227
P value0.0840.3840.0270.013
Garden classification of FNFR0.2250.1990.073
P value0.0130.0290.428
Cause of fractureR0.6210.161
P value< 0.0010.079
FNF reduction qualityR0.197
P value0.031