Chen Y, Sun XY, Qian C, Zhang XX, Zhou YJ, Zhang HY, Xie ZW. Therapeutic effect of manual massage on early postpartum rectus abdominis separation and postpartum depression. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(5): 678-685 [PMID: 38808091 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i5.678]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zhen-Wei Xie, PhD, Chief Physician, Department of Gynecology, Women’s Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, No. 1 Xueshi Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China. xiezw@zju.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Psychiatry. May 19, 2024; 14(5): 678-685 Published online May 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i5.678
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data, n (%)
Baseline data
Group S (n = 35)
Group L (n = 35)
t/χ2
P value
Age (yr)
28.20 ± 3.76
29.66 ± 3.04
1.786
0.078
Body mass index (kg/m2)
23.05 ± 2.78
22.76 ± 2.75
0.439
0.662
Delivery method
0.057
0.811
Cesarean section
17 (48.57)
16 (45.71)
Spontaneous labor
18 (51.43)
19 (54.29)
Pelvic floor muscle strength grading
0.473
0.789
Level 3
10 (28.57)
11 (31.43)
Level 4
19 (54.29)
20 (57.14)
Level 5
6 (17.14)
4 (11.43)
Table 2 Comparison of distance between rectus abdominis muscles
Group
n
3 cm above umbilicus
Navel midline
3 cm below umbilicus
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S
35
3.24 ± 0.51
1.86 ± 0.24
3.75 ± 0.66
2.01 ± 0.33
2.23 ± 0.56
1.71 ± 0.32
Group L
35
3.23 ± 0.93
1.65 ± 0.31
3.67 ± 1.09
1.78 ± 0.18
2.43 ± 0.66
1.55 ± 0.19
t value
0.056
3.169
0.371
3.777
1.367
2.486
P value
0.996
0.002
0.711
< 0.001
0.176
0.015
Table 3 Comparison of abdominal circumference index
Group
n
3 cm above umbilicus
Navel midline
3 cm below umbilicus
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S
35
83.83 ± 7.08
82.86 ± 7.67
85.73 ± 7.93
84.43 ± 7.73
87.26 ± 7.41
86.17 ± 7.84
Group L
35
83.29 ± 7.26
79.60 ± 4.75
84.39 ± 7.36
80.90 ± 5.10
86.40 ± 7.53
82.79 ± 5.43
t value
0.315
2.138
0.733
2.255
0.482
2.097
P value
0.754
0.036
0.466
0.027
0.632
0.039
Table 4 Comparison of lower back pain visual analog scale scores
Group
n
Lower back pain VAS score
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S
35
2.57 ± 1.29
1.26 ± 0.74
Group L
35
2.51 ± 1.36
0.77 ± 0.59
t value
0.19
3.063
P value
0.85
0.003
Table 5 Comparison of Edinburgh postpartum depression scale scores
Group
n
EPDS score
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S
35
9.86 ± 2.37
9.03 ± 1.28
Group L
35
9.92 ± 2.41
8.24 ± 1.06
t value
0.105
2.812
P value
0.917
0.006
Citation: Chen Y, Sun XY, Qian C, Zhang XX, Zhou YJ, Zhang HY, Xie ZW. Therapeutic effect of manual massage on early postpartum rectus abdominis separation and postpartum depression. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(5): 678-685