Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. May 19, 2024; 14(5): 678-685
Published online May 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i5.678
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data, n (%)
Baseline data
Group S (n = 35)
Group L (n = 35)
t/χ2
P value
Age (yr)28.20 ± 3.7629.66 ± 3.041.7860.078
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.05 ± 2.7822.76 ± 2.750.4390.662
Delivery method0.0570.811
    Cesarean section17 (48.57)16 (45.71)
    Spontaneous labor18 (51.43)19 (54.29)
Pelvic floor muscle strength grading 0.4730.789
    Level 310 (28.57)11 (31.43)
    Level 419 (54.29)20 (57.14)
    Level 56 (17.14)4 (11.43)
Table 2 Comparison of distance between rectus abdominis muscles
Group
n
3 cm above umbilicus
Navel midline
3 cm below umbilicus
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S353.24 ± 0.511.86 ± 0.243.75 ± 0.662.01 ± 0.332.23 ± 0.561.71 ± 0.32
Group L353.23 ± 0.931.65 ± 0.313.67 ± 1.091.78 ± 0.182.43 ± 0.661.55 ± 0.19
t value0.0563.1690.3713.7771.3672.486
P value0.9960.0020.711< 0.0010.1760.015
Table 3 Comparison of abdominal circumference index
Group
n
3 cm above umbilicus
Navel midline
3 cm below umbilicus
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S3583.83 ± 7.0882.86 ± 7.6785.73 ± 7.9384.43 ± 7.7387.26 ± 7.4186.17 ± 7.84
Group L3583.29 ± 7.2679.60 ± 4.7584.39 ± 7.3680.90 ± 5.1086.40 ± 7.5382.79 ± 5.43
t value0.3152.1380.7332.2550.4822.097
P value0.7540.0360.4660.0270.6320.039
Table 4 Comparison of lower back pain visual analog scale scores
Group
n
Lower back pain VAS score
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S352.57 ± 1.291.26 ± 0.74
Group L352.51 ± 1.360.77 ± 0.59
t value0.193.063
P value0.850.003
Table 5 Comparison of Edinburgh postpartum depression scale scores
Group
n
EPDS score
Before treatment
After treatment
Group S359.86 ± 2.379.03 ± 1.28
Group L359.92 ± 2.418.24 ± 1.06
t value0.1052.812
P value0.9170.006