Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2024; 14(12): 1956-1970
Published online Dec 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i12.1956
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Ref.
Area
Sort
Intervention
Period
Age
Sample size
Sample source
NOS score
Language
Diagnostic basis
Kong et al[25], 2024FinlandProspective cohort studyPremature1996-20184-2257236N/A7EnglishICD-10 codes
Perapoch et al[27], 2021SpainRetrospective cohort studyPremature1995-20077-197488N/A9EnglishICD-10
Bora et al[28], 2014New ZealandRetrospective cohort studyPremature1998-20009217N/A8EnglishSDQ
Cherkes-Julkowski[26], 1998N/AProspective cohort studyPrematureN/A1148N/A8EnglishStanford-Binet, 4th
Huang et al[16], 2018ChinaRetrospective cohort studyEducation level of mother2013-20146-12270Multicenter9ChineseDSM-5
St Sauver et al[33], 2004United StatesCase control studyEducation level of mother1976-198214-205701Multicenter7EnglishDSM-4
Rydell[32], 2010SwedenProspective cohort studyEducation level of motherNone101206Single center9EnglishDSM-4
Chen et al[29], 2024ChinaRetrospective cohort studyEducation level of mother2022-20236-1211190Multicenter7EnglishParent Symptom Questionnaire
Hsu et al[31], 2022Taiwan, ChinaRetrospective cohort studyEducation level of mother2000-20116-111855Multicenter5EnglishDSM-IV-TR
Yan et al[35], 2018ChinaCross-sectionalEducation level of mother20143-615291Single center7ChineseConners concise questionnaire
Cochran et al[30], 2022United StatesProspectiveEducation level of mother2002-200410-151010Multicenter9EnglishChild Symptom Inventory-4
van Dyk et al[34], 2015South AfricaCase controlEducation level of motherN/A5-13100Single center6EnglishDSM-4
Table 2 Summary of meta-analysis results of the influence of premature delivery and mother’s education level on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Intervention measure
Item
Z
OR
95%CI
P value
I2
PrematurePremature vs term21.132.762.52-3.04< 0.0011.9%
Very premature vs mild-late premature3.661.951.37-2.79< 0.00187.3%
Education level of mother≥ 12 years vs < 12 years1.560.780.57-1.070.11991.7%
≥ 12 years vs < 9 years2.190.610.39-0.950.02984.5%
≥ 12 years vs < 9 years14.980.590.48-0.73< 0.00147.1%
≥ 12 years vs 9-12 years2.400.740.58-0.950.01677.6%
9-12 years vs < 9 years1.440.740.49-1.110.15059.2%
Table 3 Assessment of quality of studies by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale
Ref.
Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Score
1
2
3
4
5a
5b
6
7
8
Kong et al[25], 202411111117
Perapoch et al[27], 20211111111119
Bora et al[28], 2014111111118
Cherkes-Julkowski[26], 1998111111118
Huang et al[16], 20181111111119
St Sauver et al[33], 200411111117
Rydell[32], 20101111111119
Chen et al[29], 202411111117
Hsu et al[31], 2022111115
Yan et al[35], 201811111117
Cochran et al[30], 20221111111119
van Dyk et al[34], 20151111116
Table 4 Subgroup analysis summary table of mothers’ education years ≥ 12 years vs < 12 years
Analysis specification
Z
OR
95%CI
P value
I2
All1.560.780.57-1.070.11991.7%
China4.210.590.46-0.75< 0.00181.2%
Other0.681.250.66-2.400.49592.3%
Multicenter1.520.670.41-1.120.12894.2%
Single0.110.970.59-1.610.91286.2%
Table 5 Summary of publication bias
Intervention measure
Item
Incorporate literature
t
P value
95%CI
PrematurePremature vs term40.670.570-3.02 to 4.13
Education level of mother≥ 12 years vs < 12 years80.570.591-4.91 to 7.88
≥ 12 years vs < 9 years6-0.130.905-4.90 to 4.49
≥ 12 years vs < 9 years13-3.290.188-10.13 to 5.96
≥ 12 years vs 9-12 years6-0.930.405-10.85 to 5.41
9-12 years vs < 9 years4-1.280.330-9.43 to 5.11
Table 6 Summary of meta-regression
Condition
t
P value
OR
95%CI
Merge0.450.6860.78-4.81 to 6.38
Quality0.210.8940.04-0.58 to 0.66
China3.100.0533.16-6.40 to 0.09
Age12.330.1022.60-0.96 to 6.17
Multicenter0.170.8760.09-1.56 to 1.74