Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Sep 19, 2023; 13(9): 607-619
Published online Sep 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i9.607
Published online Sep 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i9.607
Table 1 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Levkovitz et al[13], 2009 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates FPC | Significant improvement in HDRS scores | Headaches | This is the first time that TRD has been treated with the new H-coil |
McGirr et al[14], 2014 | 20 Hz stimulates DLFPC | Reduction in HAMD-21 scores | Unreported | Five-factor personality assessment may have prognostic value in DTMS for resistant MDD |
Levkovitz et al[15], 2015 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates PFC | HDRS-21 score was improved by 6.39 points | Unreported | It is efficacious and safe in patients not responding to antidepressant medications, and the effect remains stable |
Feffer et al[16], 2017 | 18 HZ DTMS stimulation; right abductor pollicis brevis muscle | Depressive symptoms (HDRS-21 total score) decreased significantly | Headaches | The severity of the depressive episode is associated with a positive therapeutic effect of dTMS |
Kaster et al[17], 2018 | 18 HZ DTMS stimulates DLPFC and VLPFC | Remission rate was significantly higher with active than sham rTMS (40.0% vs 14.8%) | Pain and discomfort from stimulus | High-dose DTMS appears to be safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the treatment of LLD |
Tendler et al[18], 2018 | 10 HZ DTMS combined with SSRIs | The remission rate was 35.3% | Headaches | DTMS can augment formerly ineffective SSRI treatment |
Filipčić et al[19], 2019 | 18 HZ DTMS stimulates LDLPFC | The response was significantly better in H1-coil than in 8-coil group (OR = 2.33; 95%CI: 1.04-5.21; P = 0.040) | Unreported | DTMS had better response rate than rTMS |
Matsuda et al[20], 2020 | 18 Hz DTMS stimulates LDLPFC | HDRS-21 was more significantly improved | Unreported | DTMS might be effective and safe for office workers with treatment-resistant depression |
Bahun et al[21], 2022 | 18 Hz stimulates DLFPC | Cognitive function all showed mild to moderate improvement | Unreported | Can improve MDD symptoms |
Table 2 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Modirrousta et al[30], 2015 | 1 Hz DTMS stimulates PFC | Improvement in Y-BOCS | Electric shocking sensation | Low frequency deep rTMS was effective in OCD symptom reduction |
Carmi et al[27], 2018 | 20 Hz or 1 Hz DTMS stimulates mPFC and ACC | Improvement in Y-BOCS | Slight headache | DTMS has the ability to directly modify ACC activity |
Carmi et al[31], 2019 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates mPFC and ACC | Improvement in Y-BOCS | Slight headache | High-frequency DTMS in special region can significantly improve OCD symptoms |
Ikawa et al[33], 2022 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates mPFC and ACC | Improvement in Y-BOCS | Slight headache | DTMS treatment of OCD had a favorable therapeutic effect |
Ikawa et al[33], 2022 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates mPFC and ACC | Improvement in Y-BOCS | Electric shocking sensation | DTMS was found to be a safe and effective intervention for OCD symptoms in adolescents |
Table 3 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in Schizophrenia
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Birdi et al[36], 2023 | 1 Hz DTMS stimulates LTPC | Significant improvement in AHRS score | Transient headache | DTMS treatment was effective for chronic auditory hallucinations in schizophrenic patients |
Rosenberg et al[38], 2011 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates PFC | Cognition and negative symptoms are improved | Transient headache and fatigue | DTMS can improve negative symptoms and cognitive deficits for schizophrenia patients |
Rosenberg et al[38], 2011 | 1 Hz DTMS stimulates LTPC | Significant improvement in AHRS score | Mild and self-limiting headaches | DTMS had no significant effect on auditory hallucinations |
Rabany et al[43], 2014 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates PFC | SANS was significantly reduced | Unreported | DTMS was effective for negative symptoms, but the effect was moderate |
Linsambarth et al[44], 2019 | 18 Hz DTMS stimulates bilateral PFC | SANS was significantly reduced | Temporary headaches, scalp aches, and toothaches | DTMS contributed to negative symptoms in schizophrenia |
Moeller et al[42], 2022 | 10 HZ DTMS stimulates the insular and prefrontal cortices | The DTMS group had a more pronounced decrease in insula blood flow than the sham operation group | Unreported | DTMS in smoking patients with schizophrenia was effective |
Table 4 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in substance use disorders
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Girardi et al[49], 2015 | 20 Hz DTMS stimulates DLFPC | Craving scores dropped significantly | Unreported | DTMS was well tolerated and found to be effective in AUD |
Harel et al[50], 2022 | 10 Hz DTMS stimulates mPFC and ACC | A lower percentage of heavy drinking days | Moderate to severe headaches | DTMS was a safe and well-tolerated intervention, with promising initial evidence for efficacy in alcohol addiction |
Table 5 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Study design | Significance |
Avirame et al[65], 2016 | 10 Hz DTMS for PF stimulation | 60%-70% of AD patients’ cognitive function was improved | Light headache and occasional tiredness | Case series study | DTMS led to preservation and even improvement of cognitive functions |
Leocani et al[66], 2020 | 10 Hz DTMS | ADAS-cog at 4 and 8 wk compared with baseline was improved | Temporary headaches | Double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study | DTMS was feasible and safe in patients with probable AD |
Table 6 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasia
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Spagnolo et al[72], 2013 | 10 Hz DTMS stimulates Broca’s area and DLPFC | Improvement of language function | Unreported | This observation opens new possibilities for treatment of drug-unresponsive neurodegenerative disorders |
Trebbastoni et al[73], 2013 | hf-rTMS stimulates DLPFC | Improved language in LPPA | Unreported | DTMS improved the linguistic skills |
Chieffo et al[71], 2014 | 10 Hz DTMS stimulates Broca’s area | Significant improvement in the naming power | Unreported | Deep brain rTMS improved naming in right-handed chronic poststroke aphasic patients |
Table 7 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke motor dysfunction
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Chieffo et al[76], 2014 | 20 Hz DTMS | Significant improvement in lower limb motor function | Unreported | DTMS could induce improvements in lower limb functions in the chronic post-stroke period |
Chieffo et al[77], 2018 | 20 Hz DTMS | Upper limb motor function improved significantly | Transitory dizziness, toothache, and muscle twitches | DTMS combined with exercise training is more effective (upper limb motor function) |
Table 8 Development of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
Ref. | Method | Result | Adverse events | Significance |
Spagnolo et al[84], 2014 | 10 Hz DTMS for PF stimulation | UPDRS was improved | Slight and transitory hypotension and headache | DTMS might be a safe treatment for PD motor symptoms |
Cohen et al[87], 2018 | M1 + PFC or M1 | M1 + PFC OR M1 group was improved in T-UPDRS and M-UPDRS | Mild and transient head discomfort, transient fatigue, and rare mild visual transient hallucinations during stimulation | DTMS improved PD motor symptoms but the effect was moderate |
Torres et al[80], 2015 | M1 + PFC | UPDRS was improved | Sleepiness, headaches, and nausea | DTMS improved motor, postural, and motivational symptoms of PD patients |
Cohen et al[88], 2016 | 1 Hz DTMS M1 and 10 Hz DTMS PFC | UPDRS was improved | Headache, dizziness, pain in the head or neck during treatment; nausea, general weakness, and transient aggravation of gait disturbance | DTMS improved motor, but no advantage compared to sham treatment |
Spagnolo et al[85], 2020 | M1 + PFC or M1 | UPDRS was improved | Mild, not-distressing, and transient dyskinesias | DTMS was a safe and potentially effective procedure |
Cohen et al[87], 2018 | 1 Hz M1 or 10 Hz PFC | UPDRS was improved | Headache, nausea, and discomfort of the eye region or tearing of the eyes during stimulation | DTMS can decrease the subjective motor symptom severity and depression |
- Citation: Cheng JL, Tan C, Liu HY, Han DM, Liu ZC. Past, present, and future of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation: A review in psychiatric and neurological disorders. World J Psychiatry 2023; 13(9): 607-619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v13/i9/607.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v13.i9.607