Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Jul 19, 2023; 13(7): 453-460
Published online Jul 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i7.453
Table 1 Demographic information
Categories
Control group, n = 54
Research group, n = 60
χ2/t value
P value
Sex0.0690.793
Male32 (59.26)37 (61.67)
Female22 (40.74)23 (38.33)
Age in yr40.07 ± 7.0141.28 ± 8.740.8100.420
Course of the disease in yr19.56 ± 7.5518.93 ± 5.830.5010.617
Family medical history0.2520.616
Yes6 (11.11)5 (8.33)
No48 (88.89)55 (91.67)
Marital status0.3810.537
Married33 (61.11)40 (66.67)
Single21 (38.89)20 (33.33)
Educational level1.4810.224
Below high school30 (55.56)40 (66.67)
High school and above24 (44.44)20 (33.33)
Table 2 Comparison of the therapeutic effectiveness of the two treatment methods
Indicators
Control group, n = 54
Research group, n = 60
χ2 value
P value
Marked response19 (35.19)36 (60.00)--
Response20 (37.04)20 (33.33)--
Non-response15 (27.78)4 (6.67)--
Overall response39 (72.22)56 (93.33)9.1200.003
Table 3 Comparison of the safety of the two treatment methods
Indicators
Control group, n = 54
Research group, n = 60
χ2 value
P value
Drowsiness4 (7.41)1 (1.67)--
Headache4 (7.41)1 (1.67)--
Nausea3 (5.56)2 (3.33)--
Vomiting2 (3.70)1 (1.67)--
Memory impairment1 (1.85)0 (0.00)--
Total14 (25.93)5 (8.33)6.3330.012