Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Nov 19, 2023; 13(11): 838-847
Published online Nov 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i11.838
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
Classification
Joint group (n = 60)
Control group (n = 60)
T value
P value
Age (yr)26.79 ± 3.1827.03 ± 3.210.4110.682
Gestational age (wk)39.35 ± 0.2439.28 ± 0.211.7000.092
Number of pregnancies1.84 ± 0.171.89 ± 0.211.4330.154
Parity1.59 ± 0.121.61 ± 0.150.8060.422
Estimated newborn body mass (kg)3.58 ± 0.533.65 ± 0.490.7510.454
Table 2 Comparison of childbirth-related conditions between the two groups
Group
n
Rate of conversion to cesarean section
Rate of forceps-assisted delivery
Joint group600.00 (0)3.33 (2)
Control group608.33 (5)6.67 (4)
P value< 0.05> 0.05
Table 3 Comparison of the motor block effect between the two groups
Group
n
Grade 0
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Joint group6052710
Control group6046941
Z value2.277
P value0.131
Table 4 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups (cases, %)
Group
Joint group
Control group
χ2
P value
n6060
Hypotension01
Nausea and vomiting21
Pruritus01
Deceleration of fetal heart rate01
Total incidence3.33 (2)6.67 (4)0.7020.402