Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Psychiatr. Feb 19, 2020; 10(2): 12-20
Published online Feb 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i2.12
Published online Feb 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i2.12
Ref. | SM subtype1 | Samples (n) | SM task: Source encoding conditions | OCD relevant stimuli | Significant between-groups difference in SM performances | Significant between-groups difference in confidence |
Hermans et al[24], 2003 | Internal | 17 OCD; 17 HC | ART: Imagining performing an action a fixed number of times + performing it a various number of times | Relevant compulsive + irrelevant compulsive + neutral actions | No difference between OCD and HC; No difference between high (n = 9) and low (n = 8) checkers | OCD < HC for neutral and irrelevant compulsive actions |
Merckelbach et al[25], 2000 | Internal | 19 OCD; 16 HC | ART: Imagining performing vs performing actions | No | No difference between OCD and HC; No difference between OCD checkers (n = 7) and OCD noncheckers (n = 12) | OCD < HC. Negative correlation between DES scores and confidence in OCD but not in HC |
Cougle et al[23], 2008 | Internal | 21 OCD checkers; 24 HC | ART: Imagining performing vs performing actions | Bothersome + nonbothersome actions | No difference between OCD checkers and HC in both free recall and recognition tests | OCD checkers < HC |
Constans et al[22], 1995 | Internal | 12 OCD checkers; 7 HC | ART: Imagining performing vs performing actions within action sequences | Anxiety-eliciting + neutral objects | No difference between OCD checkers and HC | No difference |
Ecker et al[19], 1995 | Internal | 24 OCD checkers; 24 HCIP + 48 LCIP | ART: Imagining performing vs performing vs imagining seeing vs subvocal rehearsal | Not specified | OCD < LCIP for free recall of performed actions and made more confusions between performed and imagined perform actions; HCIP: More misattributions of imagined actions as performed than LCIP | OCD checkers < HC, regardless of the instruction modality |
McNally et al[20], 1993 | Internal | 12 OCD checkers; 12 OCD noncheckers; 12 HC | ART: Tracing vs imagining tracing vs seeing drawings or words | No | No difference between checkers and noncheckers | OCD noncheckers < HC for words or drawings they traced. OCD checkers and noncheckers < HC for words they imagined |
Moritz et al[29], 2009 | Internal | 32 OCD; 32 HC | ART: Imagining vs performing actions | No | No difference between OCD and HC | No difference |
External | 32 OCD; 32 HC | ART: Verbal vs nonverbal instruction (pictogram) | No difference between OCD and HC | |||
Rubenstein et al[15], 1993 | Exp 1a: Internal + Reality | 20 CP; 20 HC | ART: Seeing vs performing vs writing actions | No | CP made more SM confusions than HC | NA |
Exp 3: Internal | 20 CP; 20 HC | WRT (word pair completion): Reading a word pair vs generating the second word of a pair | No | CP made more SM confusions than HC | NA | |
Zermatten et al[21], 2006 | Internal + Reality | 19 CP; 35 nonCP | ART: Imagining performing vs performing vs imagining seeing vs seeing vs verbally repeating | No | CP misattributed more performed actions as seen than nonCP (significant correlation with OCI-R checking); No difference for misattribution of performed actions as imagined perform | No difference |
Reese et al[26], 2011 | Reality | 20 OCD; 20 HC; 20 BDD | WRT: Imagining seeing vs seeing words | Neutral + negative + BDD-related + OCD-related words | No difference between OCD and HC | No difference |
Sher et al[10], 1983 | Reality | 26 CP; 28 nonCP | WRT (word pair completion): Imagining the second word of a pair vs seeing it written | No | No difference between CP and nonCP | CP < nonCP |
Brown et al[27], 1994 | Reality | 28 OCD; 21 HC | WRT: Imagining seeing vs seeing words | No | OCD > HC. Among OCD, checkers (n = 13) < cleaners (n = 9) | NA |
Kim et al[28], 2009 | External | 14 OCD; 14 HC | WRT: Female vs male voices | No | OCD < HC | Cognitive confidence subscores of MCQ were significantly higher in the OCD group than the control group; No correlation between confidence scores and SM |
- Citation: Lavallé L, Brunelin J, Bation R, Mondino M. Review of source-monitoring processes in obsessive-compulsive disorder. World J Psychiatr 2020; 10(2): 12-20
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v10/i2/12.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v10.i2.12