Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Psychiatr. Oct 19, 2020; 10(10): 234-244
Published online Oct 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i10.234
Table 1 General characteristics of the subjects with depression, n (%)
CharacteristicsDepression
P value
No (n = 130)
Yes (n = 93)
Age0.918
60-74 yr83 (58.0)60 (42.0)
≥ 75 yr47 (58.8)33 (41.3)
Sex0.183
Male 62 (63.3)36 (36.7)
Female68 (54.4)57 (45.6)
Education level0.158
Middle school graduate and below 76 (54.7)63 (45.3)
High school graduate and above54 (64.3)30 (35.7)
Handness0.905
Right125 (58.4)89 (41.6)
Left2 (66.7)1 (33.3)
Both hands2 (50.0)2 (50.0)
Family PD history0.921
No108 (58.7)76 (41.3)
Yes9 (60.0)6 (40.0)
Pack year (smoking)0.666
1-20 pack year6 (42.9)8 (57.1)
21-40 pack year5 (62.5)3 (37.5)
41-60 pack year1 (50.0)1 (50.0)
61+ pack year118 (59.3)81 (40.7)
Traumatic brain injury0.852
No118 (60.8)76 (39.2)
Yes7 (63.6)4 (36.4)
Diabetes0.214
No103 (60.9)66 (39.1)
Yes25 (51.0)24 (49.0)
Hypertension0.246
No71 (55.5)57 (44.5)
Yes57 (63.3)33 (36.7)
Hyperlipidemia0.220
No114 (60.3)75 (39.7)
Yes14 (48.3)15 (51.7)
Tremor0.630
No17 (54.8)14 (45.2)
Yes107 (59.4)73 (40.6)
Rigidity0.342
No8 (72.7)3 (27.3)
Yes120 (58.3)86 (41.7)
Bradykinesia0.962
No7 (58.3)5 (41.7)
Yes121 (59.0)84 (41.0)
Postural instability0.187
No66 (64.1)37 (35.9)
Yes59 (55.1)48 (44.9)
REM and RBD0.081
No58 (63.7)33 (36.3)
Yes55 (51.4)52 (48.6)
Late motor complications0.140
Only ON-OFF/Wearing OFF12 (54.5)10 (45.5)
Only levodopa-induced dyskinesia2 (22.2)7 (77.8)
Both ON-OFF/Wearing OFF and levodopa-induced dyskinesia are present 13 (59.1)9 (40.9)
Both ON-OFF / Wearing OFF and levodopa-induced dyskinesia are absent99 (61.1)63 (38.9)
K-MMSE, mean ± SD24.2 ± 4.621.5 ± 6.1< 0.001
K-MoCA, mean ± SD18.2 ± 6.113.9 ± 6.7< 0.001
Global CDR score, mean ± SD0.5 ± 0.30.8 ± 0.7< 0.001
Sum of boxes in CDR, mean ± SD2.3 ± 3.13.3 ± 4.00.041
K-IADL, mean ± SD1.3 ± 3.03.2 ± 5.60.003
Total score of UPDRS, mean ± SD 34.5 ± 17.153.2 ± 26.1< 0.001
Motor score of UPDRS, mean ± SD22.7 ± 10.930.0 ± 13.5< 0.001
H and Y staging, mean ± SD2.2 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.90.002
Schwab and England ADL, mean ± SD80.1 ± 14.567.3 ± 21.5< 0.001
Table 2 Comparing the accuracy of depression in Parkinson's disease prediction model, %
Type of algorithm
Overall accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
C-SVM: Linear92.592.093.3
C-SVM: Polynomial70.010020.0
C-SVM: Gaussian 87.596.073.3
C-SVM: Sigmoid85.088.080.0
Nu-SVM: Linear90.092.086.6
Nu-SVM: Polynomial92.592.093.3
Nu-SVM: Gaussian95.096.093.3
Nu-SVM: Sigmoid82.592.066.6
Table 3 Functional weight (importance of variables)
Variables
Functional weight
K-MMSE-1.454
K-MoCA-4.499
CDR (Global CDR score)2.643
CDR (sum of boxes)2.607
K-IADL4.919
Total UPDRS5.302
Motor UPDRS 0.978
H and Y staging-2.190
Schwab and England ADL-5.055
Age (60-74)-3.638
Age (75+)3.638
Gender (female)0.345
Education (high school graduate and above)1.150
Family PD history (yes)0.232
Pack year (21-40)0.032
Pack year (41-60)0.000
Pack year (61+)-1.032
Coffee (yes)1.006
Pesticide exposure (currently not exposed but exposed previously)-1.000
Pesticide exposure (currently exposed to pesticide)2.264
Tremor (yes)0.000
Rigidity (yes)-1.000
Bradykinesia (yes)0.675
Postural instability (yes)1.117
LMC (levodopa-induced dyskinesia)3.000
LMC (Both Wearing OFF and levodopa-induced dyskinesia are present)0.264
LMC (Both Wearing OFF and levodopa-induced dyskinesia are absent)-4.715
REM sleep behavior disorders 1.261
Number of support vectors: 34