Published online Jun 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i6.232
Peer-review started: December 12, 2020
First decision: January 7, 2021
Revised: January 25, 2021
Accepted: April 26, 2021
Article in press: April 26, 2021
Published online: June 19, 2021
Processing time: 180 Days and 13.8 Hours
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the universal implementation of control measures are fundamentally affecting every aspect of our society and daily lives.
To evaluate the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and their associated factors as well as the effects and attitudes towards online education in Chinese high school students.
A total of 883 students were included. The first, second and third-year students of a high school in Lanzhou, Gansu province of China were invited to participate in this study. They were requested to involve their parents to complete the survey together. A detailed questionnaire of 65 questions was designed and divided into five sections. The survey was anonymously conducted via WeChat, a Chinese multipurpose messaging, social media and mobile payment app.
Overall, 32.94% of students experienced post-traumatic stress disorder due to the COVID-19 epidemic. The majority of students (60.82%) felt that online education was not (10.76%) or less effective (50.06%) in terms of gaining knowledge and improving practical and communications skills. Correlation analysis revealed that the class level, residential background and whether living with parents were significantly linked with the effectiveness and satisfaction of the online education system. Of the final year students, 74.2% said that the COVID-19 outbreak has negatively affected their preparation for the college entrance exam, and 68% of students felt that this outbreak increased psychological pressure for their college entrance examination preparation. In case of having COVID-19 symptoms during the exam, 50.7%, 13.3%, and 10.2% would notify the proctor, teacher and parents, respectively.
We found a high prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in high school students. Thus, our results call for urgent attention from both government and schools to implement effective interventions to cope with the psychological effects and the disturbance of education by COVID-19 on children.
Core Tip: This study evaluated the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and their associated factors as well as the effects and attitudes towards online education in Chinese high school students. We found a high prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in high school students. Thus, our results call for urgent attention from both government and schools to implement effective interventions to cope with the psychological effects and the disturbance of education by coronavirus disease 2019 on children.
- Citation: Ma ZR, Ma WH, Idris S, Pan QW, Baloch Z. COVID-19 impact on high school student’s education and mental health: A cohort survey in China. World J Psychiatr 2021; 11(6): 232-241
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v11/i6/232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i6.232
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the universal implementation of control measures are fundamentally affecting every aspect of our society and daily lives. School closure is one of the most important measures widely implemented worldwide. According to UNESCO’s estimates, more than 190 countries have adopted nationwide school closures, resulting in roughly 90% of the global student population out of school and confined at home[1]. The classroom syllabus has been swiftly changed into an online education system. However, the education sector was not well-prepared to launch such large-scale online education programs. Thus, the effectiveness of this new education format and the effects on students remain largely uncertain.
According to epidemiological research after a traumatic event, about 5%-12% of individuals may develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [2]. School closure, living in confinement and risk of the infection are creating anxiety and are affecting education, psychological health and well-being of students [1]. According to Chinese government estimates approximately 220 million teenagers were not allowed to go out during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. However, the consequences and the degrees of impact could vary among different levels of students.
In China, the schooling system includes primary school (6 years), junior middle school/secondary school (3 years) and senior middle school/ high school (3 years). Afterwards, students have the opportunity to continue to higher education by passing the college entrance examination, a nine-hour national higher education entrance exam. It is offered once a year and taken by around 10 million students annually. It is the sole determinant for admission to virtually all Chinese colleges and universities. Because of a limited amount of university spots available, it is an ultra-competitive exam and imposes tremendous pressure on the third-year high school students.
The COVID-19 epidemic was first reported in China. The teenagers were restricted at home for a long time and were the first to switch to online education. Although the rises of psychosomatic issues caused by COVID-19, especially in teenagers, have been widely reported [3-5], innovative investigation into this issue remains scarce. In this study, we conducted a large cohort survey in a high school at the end of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. We evaluated the prevalence of PTSD symptoms and their associated factors as well as the effects and attitudes towards online education. We further investigated the impact on the final year high school students relating to the college entrance examination.
The first, second and third-year students of a high school in Lanzhou, Gansu province of China were invited to participate in this study. They were requested to complete the survey with their parents. The study was conducted from April 20 to April 30, 2020.
A detailed questionnaire comprising of 65 questions was designed and divided into five sections. The first four sections were designed for all the students, comprising of 11 demographic, 11 COVID-19, 9 online educations and 22 PTSD related questions. The final section consisted of 11 college entrance examination related questions specific for the final year students. The survey was anonymously conducted via WeChat, a Chinese multipurpose messaging, social media and mobile payment app.
The 9 online education related questions were designed to assess effectiveness (3 questions), efficiency (3 questions) and satisfaction (3 questions). Each question was comprised of five options including no, low, average, good and excellent.
In this study, we used Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) self-questioner to examine the psychological impact[6,7]. Further detail has been documented previously[5]. IES-R questioner was translated into Chinese language. IES-R questioner validity and reliability has been extensively reported[8-10].
Descriptive statistical analysis was done to demonstrate the demographic characteristics of the participants. First, a univariate analysis was done to screen statistically significant variables, which were subsequently subjected to multivariate logistic regression analyses. The estimations of the strengths of associations were revealed by the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In total, 893 students participated in the survey. Ten students declined to continue. Therefore, 883 students were included. Participant demographic characteristics were given in Table 1. There were 33.4% first-year, 23.6% second-year and 43.0% final year students. Most students were from the Han ethnic background (98.1%), and 53.2% were girls and 46.8% were boys. The majority of the students were living with parents (96.3%) in urban areas (85.4%) (Table 1).
Characteristic | Total | % |
Sex | ||
Male | 413 | 46.8 |
Female | 470 | 53.2 |
Class | ||
Class 1 | 295 | 33.4 |
Class 2 | 208 | 23.6 |
Class 3 | 380 | 43.0 |
Ethnic | ||
Han | 866 | 98.1 |
Others | 17 | 1.9 |
Residence | ||
Urban | 754 | 85.4 |
Rural | 129 | 14.6 |
Children | ||
Single | 441 | 49.9 |
Double | 388 | 43.9 |
Multiple | 54 | 6.1 |
Father education | ||
Primary or less | 82 | 9.3 |
Middle | 331 | 37.5 |
College | 299 | 33.9 |
University | 157 | 17.8 |
Not filled | 14 | 1.6 |
Mother education | ||
Primary or less | 69 | 7.8 |
Middle | 310 | 35.1 |
College | 294 | 33.3 |
University | 191 | 21.6 |
Not filled | 19 | 2.2 |
Father profession | ||
Farmer | 118 | 13.4 |
Teacher, doctor and civil | 60 | 6.8 |
Private company employees | 137 | 15.5 |
Self-business | 47 | 5.3 |
Others | 506 | 57.3 |
Not filled | 15 | 1.7 |
Mother profession | ||
Farmer | 108 | 12.2 |
Teacher, doctor and civil | 69 | 7.8 |
Private company employees | 149 | 16.9 |
Self-business | 79 | 8.9 |
Others | 457 | 51.8 |
Not filled | 21 | 2.4 |
Monthly income in RMB | ||
< 3000 | 196 | 22.2 |
3001-5000 | 388 | 43.9 |
5001-10000 | 242 | 27.4 |
10000 | 57 | 6.5 |
Live with who | ||
Parents | 850 | 96.3 |
Grand parents | 23 | 2.6 |
Caregivers | 10 | 1.1 |
The majority of students (683 of 866) reported that their families are fully aware of COVID-19. Overall, students reported that they were affected economically (41.6%), psychologically (22.1%), emotionally (6.8%), socially (6.8%) and physically (6.8%) by the COVID-19 epidemic. In contrast, 14.9% of students reported that they were unaffected. A large percentage (93.0%) reported that they have gone back to their normal routine (Table 2). The outbreak negatively affected 68.3% of student’s studies. Although 96.5% of the respondents were willing to returning back to schools, 63.0% of students have concerns regarding the risk of getting COVID-19 once back to school. Knowledge about the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 such as fever, difficulty/shortness of breath, cough, flu-like symptoms, diarrhea, fatigue, sore throat and chills were found to be known by 65.2%, 12.9%, 7.6%, 4.4%, 1.6%, 1.0%, 0.9% and 0.1% of participants, respectively. When students suspect infection, 51.0% of the participants prefer to inform their teachers, whereas 29.7% would go into self-isolation (Table 2).
Features | Total | Positive | % | P value |
Prevalence | 883 | 291 | 33.0 | |
Class | 0.61 | |||
Class 1 | 295 | 98 | 33.2 | |
Class 2 | 208 | 63 | 30.3 | |
Class 3 | 380 | 130 | 34.2 | |
Residence | 0.001 | |||
Urban | 754 | 230 | 30.5 | |
Rural | 129 | 61 | 47.3 | |
Father education | 0.05 | |||
Primary or less | 82 | 26 | 31.7 | |
Middle | 331 | 129 | 39.0 | |
College | 299 | 85 | 28.4 | |
University | 157 | 48 | 30.6 | |
Not filled | 14 | 3 | 21.4 | |
Mother education | 0.024 | |||
Primary or less | 69 | 35 | 50.7 | |
Middle | 310 | 103 | 33.2 | |
College | 294 | 89 | 30.3 | |
University | 191 | 57 | 29.8 | |
Not filled | 19 | 7 | 36.8 | |
Father profession | 0.009 | |||
Farmer | 118 | 55 | 46.6 | |
Teach, doctor and civil servant | 60 | 17 | 28.3 | |
Private company employees | 137 | 46 | 33.6 | |
Self-business | 47 | 18 | 38.3 | |
Others | 506 | 153 | 30.2 | |
Not filled | 15 | 2 | 13.3 | |
Mother profession | 0.019 | |||
Farmer | 108 | 51 | 47.2 | |
Teach, doctor and civil servant | 69 | 18 | 26.1 | |
Private company employees | 149 | 53 | 35.6 | |
Self-business | 79 | 26 | 32.9 | |
Others | 457 | 137 | 30.0 | |
Not filled | 21 | 6 | 28.6 |
In this study, a total of 33.0% students had an IES-R score above 20 (Table 3). PTSD symptoms were significantly higher in rural (P = 0.001) compared to urban students. PTSD symptoms were also significantly more prevalent in students whose parents have lower education and profession levels (Table 3).
Inquiry item | n | % |
Do you and your family understand the COVID-19 outbreak? | 866 | 98.1 |
COVID-19 affected you physically | 60 | 6.8 |
COVID-19 affected you economically | 367 | 41.6 |
COVID-19 affected you psychologically | 195 | 22.1 |
COVID-19 affected you emotionally | 69 | 7.8 |
COVID-19 affected you socially | 60 | 6.8 |
COVID-19 did not affect you | 132 | 14.9 |
Did you back to your normal routine after COVID-19 epidemic under control in China? | 821 | 93.0 |
The COVID-19 outbreak has negatively affected your study? | 603 | 68.3 |
Do you think the COVID-19 outbreak will have a long-term negative impact on your future studies? | 221 | 25.0 |
Do you think students should gradually return to school? | 848 | 96.0 |
Are you fully prepared for returning to school? | 852 | 96.5 |
Do you think there is a risk of getting COVID-19 back to school? | 556 | 63.0 |
How will you reduce the risk of getting COVID-19 after school opening? | ||
Strict personal hygiene | 294 | 33.3 |
Wear a mask on the way to school and home | 129 | 14.6 |
Wear a mask at school | 268 | 30.4 |
Avoid eating in the cafeteria | 9 | 1.0 |
Reduce exchanges and activities between classmates | 47 | 5.3 |
Avoid or reduce the use of public transportation | 38 | 4.3 |
Avoid or reduce access to public places | 92 | 10.4 |
Do not know | 5 | 0.6 |
No action required | 1 | 0.1 |
Symptoms of new corona virus infections? | ||
Fever | 576 | 65.2 |
Cough | 67 | 7.6 |
Chills | 1 | 0.1 |
Difficulty breathing/shortness of breath | 114 | 12.9 |
Flu-like symptoms | 39 | 4.4 |
Diarrhea | 14 | 1.6 |
Fatigue | 9 | 1.0 |
Sore throat | 8 | 0.9 |
None of the above | 48 | 5.4 |
Do not know | 7 | 0.8 |
What do you do if you feel the symptoms of COVID-19 at school? | ||
Confidential | 2 | 0.2 |
Continue school normally | 2 | 0.2 |
Self-isolation | 262 | 29.7 |
Take medicine by self- | 1 | 0.1 |
Visit doctor by self | 71 | 8.0 |
Notify the teacher | 450 | 51.0 |
Notify parents | 86 | 9.7 |
Tell class fellow | 1 | 0.1 |
Do not know | 1 | 0.1 |
Others | 7 | 0.8 |
Students felt that online education was not (10.8%) or less effective (50.1%) for acquisition of knowledge, enlightening practical as well as communication skills. Students reported that it was not (17.9%) or less (43.9%) effective that students were not able to complete their homework, communicate with teachers and take advantages of the multimedia setup. Over half (64.8%) of the students reported that they were not or less satisfied and had difficulties adapting to the online education system (Supplementary Table 1). Correlation analysis revealed that the class level, residential background and whether they lived with parents were significantly associated with satisfaction and effectiveness of the virtual tutoring system (Supplementary Table 2).
This study showed that IES-R scores were substantially associated with residential background, the education level and profession of parents and family monthly income (Supplementary Table 2). According to univariate analysis, residential background, family monthly income and the professions of mother and father were significantly linked with PTSD symptoms. For multiple logistic regression analysis, only residential background remained as a significant factor relating to PTSD symptoms in children (Supplementary Table 3).
In this study, 380 participants were final year students and thus were eligible to fill in the college entrance examination section of the questionnaire. Twenty-seven participants did not complete all questions and were excluded, resulting in 353 students for final analysis. Among them, 74.2% said that the COVID-19 outbreak negatively affected their preparation for the college entrance exam. The outbreak increased psychological pressure for the college entrance examination preparation in 68.0% of students. Although 54.7% students regarded the online learning system as helpful to their preparation, 97.7% said that school opening would be beneficial for preparing for the college entrance examination. The postponement of the college entrance examination was favored by 90.4% of students. There were concerns regarding the risk of getting COVID-19 during the exam from 61.8% of students. To minimize the risk, 41.6% participants said that they would follow strict personal hygiene during the college entrance examination. A face mask would be worn during the exam by 19.5%, and 17.8% would use the mask on the way to the exam and to home. If a student had COVID-19 symptoms during the exam, then 50.7%, 13.3% and 10.2% would notify the proctor, teacher and parents, respectively (Supplementary Table 4).
To minimize the spread of COVID-19, China has implemented strict quarantine measures including school closures, travel bans, lockdowns and within-population quarantine. These measures have majorly impacted the mental health of young children and adolescents[3,4]. Here, we first measured the COVID-19 epidemic effects on the mental health of high school students. Further, we identified the potential risk factors linked with PTSD symptom development in this youth cohort. Our results showed that 33.0% of students experienced PTSD signs and symptoms due to the COVID-19 epidemic. The high PTSD symptom incidence rate is likely attributed to several factors, including confinement at home, worrying about their academic progress and future plans as well as fearing the risk of infection [3,4,11-15]. We found that PTSD symptoms were significantly higher in rural students and students whose parents have lower levels of education and professions. This is in line with the fact that COVID-19 has had a substantial effect on the global economy, including an increase in the unemployment rate[16]. Families with low social economic status having such economic loss will likely experience immediate effects on their daily livelihood. This will subsequently increase psychological and economic pressure on their children[17].
To minimize education losses, the authorities have swiftly launched online portals and web-based applications and switched the education system to a virtual education system. However, virtual education systems need an efficient and well-organized learning environment and implementation. However, the sudden outbreak of COVID-19 in China caused a substantial variance in virtual systems among schools of different provinces. In this study, the majority of students were not satisfied with online education. The class level of the students, residential background and living with parents were significantly linked with the online education system effectiveness. There are two possible reasons. First, students from higher classes are skilled enough to adapt the virtual education system. Provinces or families with an advanced socioeconomic background are more equipped with the latest technologies. Second, the majority of the participants were not happy with the virtual teaching system. The education department officials should take this issue seriously to improve the virtual education system effectiveness and ensure all students have access to the digital devices and its use.
The final year high school students are facing with mounting pressure of the national college entrance exam. The results of this exam often have a lifelong effect on most Chinese citizens[18]. The college entrance examination usually takes place from June 7 to June 8 every year. The Chinese Ministry of Education postponed the exam by 1 mo due to the COVID-19 epidemic. In our survey, over half of the final year students felt that the COVID-19 outbreak negatively affected their preparation for the exam and increased their psychological pressure. Although half of the students thought the online learning system helped their preparation, almost all the students preferred school opening for better preparation of the college entrance examination. Over 90.0% of students favored the postponement of the college entrance examination. Over half have concerns of the potential risk of getting COVID-19 during the exam, but they are prepared to take precaution measures.
A limitation in this study is that this survey was conducted in a single school in China in a region with a low number of confirmed COVID-19 cases. Therefore, the findings in this study may not represent other schools and regions in China. Finally, we did not study the content of online education in detail in our cohort as it cannot represent the format of other regions because it varies markedly among different schools and regions in China.
In this study, we found that 33.0% of high school students have experienced PTSD symptoms due to the COVID-19 epidemic. These symptoms are significantly more common in students living in rural areas and whose parents have a low education level and low grade jobs. The epidemic has affected the preparation of the national college entrance exam for the final year students, but they appreciate the postponement of the exam by 1 mo. Notably, a large proportion of respondents were not satisfied with online education. Therefore, it is suggested that the authorities optimize the online education program and ensure equal opportunities for the students to get access to the digital learning. Our results call for urgent attention from both government and schools to implement effective interventions to manage the psychological effects and the disturbance of education by COVID-19 on children.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic control measures are disturbing every aspect of our daily lives. School closures have been widely implemented according to COVID-19 cases in the world. Therefore, approximately 90% of the global student population is confined at home.
School education was suddenly replaced with a virtual education system but the education sector was not ready to adopt it. Therefore, the effects of this new education system on student learning remain ambiguous. Additionally, the risks of infection and confinement at home are affecting student education and psychological health.
The current study was designed to explore the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and their associated factors in high school students and their assessment of the online education system.
The first, second and third-year students of a high school at Lanzhou were invited to participate via WeChat, a local social media app in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In total, 883 students were included in this study. Among them, 33.4% were first year, 23.6% were second year, and 43.0% were third year students. The majority (98.1%) of students’ families were well-aware of COVID-19. Overall, 41.6% of students were affected economically, and 22.1% were affected psychologically due to the COVID-19 epidemic. Interestingly, 14.9% of students said that they were not affected by the COVID-19 epidemic. In this study, the prevalence of PTSD symptoms was 33.0%, and its prevalence was significantly higher in rural students (P = 0.001) than in urban students. The high prevalence of PTSD symptoms significantly correlated with the education level, residential background, parent’s profession and family monthly income.
In summary, our results showed that the prevalence of PTSD symptoms was 33.0% among high school students due to the COVID-19 epidemic, and a significantly high prevalence occurred in students who live in rural areas and whose parents had low-grade jobs and education level. Our results further highlighted that the COVID-19 epidemic has also affected the final year student’s national college entrance exam preparation. Most notably, the majority of respondents were not pleased with the virtual education system.
Education department officials should take measures to optimize the online education system and guarantee equal access to the digital learning devices. Further, we suggest that effective measures should also be implemented to minimize the risk of psychological issues caused by COVID-19 on students.
We sincerely thank all the participants who took part in this study.
Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript
Specialty type: Psychiatry
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Barone MTU S-Editor: Gao CC L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Li JH
1. | The Lancet Child Adolescent Health. Pandemic school closures: risks and opportunities. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:341. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 61] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54] [Article Influence: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Ursano RJ, Zhang L, Li H, Johnson L, Carlton J, Fullerton CS, Benedek DM. PTSD and traumatic stress from gene to community and bench to bedside. Brain Res. 2009;1293:2-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Dalton L, Rapa E, Stein A. Protecting the psychological health of children through effective communication about COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:346-347. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 272] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 257] [Article Influence: 64.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Wang G, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zhang J, Jiang F. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395:945-947. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1064] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 935] [Article Influence: 233.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Ma Z, Idris S, Zhang Y, Zewen L, Wali A, Ji Y, Pan Q, Baloch Z. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on education and mental health of Chinese children aged 7-15 years: an online survey. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:95. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 70] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49] [Article Influence: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Beck JG, Grant DM, Read JP, Clapp JD, Coffey SF, Miller LM, Palyo SA. The impact of event scale-revised: psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22:187-198. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 275] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 292] [Article Influence: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209-218. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5271] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4749] [Article Influence: 105.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Joseph S. Psychometric evaluation of Horowitz's Impact of Event Scale: a review. J Trauma Stress. 2000;13:101-113. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 275] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 245] [Article Influence: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Chong MY, Wang WC, Hsieh WC, Lee CY, Chiu NM, Yeh WC, Huang OL, Wen JK, Chen CL. Psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on health workers in a tertiary hospital. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:127-133. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 465] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 441] [Article Influence: 22.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Hsu CC, Chong MY, Yang P, Yen CF. Posttraumatic stress disorder among adolescent earthquake victims in Taiwan. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:875-881. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 136] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 121] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Bao Y, Sun Y, Meng S, Shi J, Lu L. 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society. Lancet. 2020;395:e37-e38. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1076] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 983] [Article Influence: 245.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Ayittey FK, Ayittey MK, Chiwero NB, Kamasah JS, Dzuvor C. Economic impacts of Wuhan 2019-nCoV on China and the world. J Med Virol. 2020;92:473-475. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 234] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 179] [Article Influence: 44.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4551] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4993] [Article Influence: 1248.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
14. | Cornine A. Reducing Nursing Student Anxiety in the Clinical Setting: An Integrative Review. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020;41:229-234. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 88] [Article Influence: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395:470-473. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4848] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4285] [Article Influence: 1071.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
16. | Kawohl W, Nordt C. COVID-19, unemployment, and suicide. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:389-390. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 421] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 388] [Article Influence: 97.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2614] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2373] [Article Influence: 593.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Gao H, Liu W, Nie J. Who, What and Where (WWW) Problems in Scientific Communities. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:327-330. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |