Acceptance and commitment therapy for enhancing mental health in military personnel: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Figure 1 Literature screening process and quality assessment results of included studies. A: Flowchart of literature inclusion; B: Summary of bias risk assessment for included studies.

Figure 2 Forest plot. A: Analysis of acceptance and commitment therapy's impact on military personnel mental health interventions; B: Subgroup analysis forest plot of the impact of acceptance and commitment therapy intervention duration on mental health in military personnel; C: Subgroup analysis forest plot of the impact of acceptance and commitment therapy intervention duration on mental health in military personnel.

Figure 3 Publication bias assessment for the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in enhancing mental health in military personnel. A: Begg's funnel plot. Each point represents the effect size estimate and its precision for an individual study; B: Results of Egger's regression test. The horizontal axis represents standard error, the vertical axis represents effect size, points denote individual studies, and the blue line represents the regression line.

Figure 4 Exploring the potential of acceptance and commitment therapy in military interventions. ACT: Acceptance and commitment therapy; PTSD: Post-traumatic stress disorder.