Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Pharmacol. Dec 9, 2014; 3(4): 39-55
Published online Dec 9, 2014. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v3.i4.39
Table 1 Antimalarial compounds in Artemisia annua vs falciparum malaria
CompoundCompound IC50 (μmol/L)Compound + artemisinin IC50 (nmol/L)Ref.
Terpenes
Artemisinin0.033 0.022, 0.0231Not applicableLiu et al[52]
Artemisinic acid77.8, 61.61No numerical value provided; response depended on concentration of compound tested with artemisininSuberu et al[19]
Arteannuin B3.2, 4.81
Dihydroartemisinic acid21.1, 17.71
Nerolidol94Interaction with artemisinin not yet testedvan Zyl et al[55]
α-pinene14
1,8-cineole (eucalyptol)704
Limonene5334
Phenolic acids
Chlorogenic acid69.4, 61.41No numerical value provided; response depended on concentration of compound tested with artemisininSuberu et al[19]
Rosmarinic acid65.1, 65.01
Flavonoids
Artemetin2626Liu et al[52]
Casticin2426
Cirsilineol2322.5
Chrysoplenol-D3215
Chrysoplenetin3616
Eupatorin6530
Isovitexin72.5, 48.11Interaction with artemisinin not yet testedSuberu et al[19]
Luteolin11, 122Lehane et al[54]
Kaempferol33, 252
Myricetin40, 762
Quercetin15, 142, 14.7, 4.11, 2.943
Ganesh et al[58]
Rutin7.1, 3.5, 10.383
Table 2 Kenyan human trial data[20] for orally delivered dried leaf Artemisia annua (plant-based artemisinin combination therapy)
pACT (dried leaf A. annua tablets, ea 500 mg, 3.7 mg artemisinin/tablet)
Artemisinin dose (mg)No. ofpatients
Leaf DW (g)%Recrudescence
Day 1
Days 2-6
Day 1
Days 2-6
7.4 × 23.7 × 2122125
11.1 × 27.4 × 212329.1
14.8 × 211.1 × 2124316.7
18.5 × 214.8 × 212549.1
Compare to orally delivered pure artemisinin[39]
Day 1Day 2-7
500 × 2500227NA24
Table 3 Estimated numbers of adult patients treatable from plant-based artemisinin combination therapy1
For A. annua cultivar containingNumber of patients treated at various dry leaf tonnage
2 T/ha23 T/ha4 T/ha35 T/ha
0.7% artemisinin/g DW (Kenyan cultivar)127260190890254520318150
1.4% artemisinin/g DW (WPI cultivar)254520381780509040636300
Table 4 Estimated number of patient treatments by current artemisinin combination therapy vs plant-based artemisinin combination therapy
Combination therapy drugAdult treatments per ton of artemisinin
AL11.76 million
AS/AQ12.5 million
pACT leaves with 0.7% artemisinin28.6 million
Table 5 Comparison of emerging antimalarial therapeutic technologies with plant-based artemisinin combination therapy
TechnologyAdvantagesDisadvantages
Synthetic AN[116]Fully synthetic method giving AN = compoundRequires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance
Lowers AN cost compared to extractionNot yet in production
Needs sophisticated process
Likely all under Western control
Challenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing
Semi-synthetic AN[117]Semi-synthetic method giving authentic ANRequires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance
Lowers AN cost compared to extractionProduction began via Sanofi
Needs sophisticated process
Likely all under Western control
Challenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing
OZ439[118]Single dose cure insures patient complianceRequires co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistance
In successful Phase 2 trialsNot yet in production
Mechanism of action not the same as ANNeeds sophisticated process
Probably low cost due to full synthesisLikely all under Western control
pACT[20-24]Has its own in planta co-drug to obviate emergence of AN drug resistanceNot yet in production
Very low costLikely to meet push back from pharmaceutical industry
Very consistent productChallenging patient compliance due to multiday dosing
Can be used to treat other diseases
Can be locally owned, produced, managed, and distributed