Negi G, KB A, Panda PK. Ground level utility of Access, Watch, Reserve classification: Insights from a tertiary care center in North India. World J Exp Med 2023; 13(5): 123-133 [PMID: 38173545 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Prasan Kumar Panda, MBBS, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 409, Rishikesh 249203, India. motherprasanna@rediffmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Infectious Diseases
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Exp Med. Dec 20, 2023; 13(5): 123-133 Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v13.i5.123
Table 1 Descriptive data representing the antibiotic usage patterns categorized according to the designation of prescriber, department, outpatient vs inpatient and AWaRe classification
Category
Counts
% of total
Total number of patients
123
Total prescriptions
123
No. of different antibiotics used
27
Most common antibiotic
Metronidazole
19
Designation
Senior resident
42
18.7
Junior resident
162
72.0
Consultant
21
9.3
OPD/IPD
OPD
55
24.6
IPD
169
75.4
Department
Medicine
112
49.6
Surgery
114
50.4
WHO AWaRe classification
Access
140
57.61
Watch
93
38.27
Reserve
10
4.11
Antibiotics used in a patient
Duration of antibiotics
Mean
1.84
6.63
Median
2
6.00
Standard deviation
0.833
3.83
Minimum
1
1.00
Maximum
5
19.0
Table 2 Representation of knowledge of World Health Organization Access, Watch, Reserve classification among healthcare professionals
Category
Counts
% of total
Position
Junior resident
65
69.9
Senior resident
24
25.8
Faculty
4
4.3
Do you know about WHO AWaRe classification
No details
22
23.7
Yes
31
33.3
Never heard
21
22.6
Little Idea
19
20.4
How did you hear about AWaRe?
The internet
29
31.2
The WHO website
10
10.8
The antimicrobial policy of our institution
14
15.1
Other sources
19
20.4
No idea about it
21
22.6
Table 3 Knowledge (Score) on World Health Organization Access, Watch, Reserve classification
Total score
Junior resident (n = 21)
Senior resident (n = 9)
Consultant (n = 3)
Medicine (n = 24)
Surgery (n = 9)
n
33
-
-
-
-
-
Mean
3.91
3.81
4.22
3.67
3.79
4.22
Standard deviation
2.17
2.25
2.33
1.53
2.08
2.49
Minimum
1
1
1
2
1
1
Maximum
8
8
8
5
8
8
Table 4 Representation of awareness towards World Health Organization Access, Watch, Reserve classification among healthcare professionals
Statement
False
True
No idea
n
Emergence of Antimicrobial Resistance is inevitable
24
68
1
93
It will result in inability to treat serious infections
13
80
0
93
Lengthier hospital stays will be a result
35
58
0
93
Success of chemotherapy and major surgery will be hampered
50
43
0
93
Cost of treatment will be increased
52
41
0
93
MMR and IMR will increase
62
31
0
93
Table 5 Representation of attitude towards World Health Organization Access, Watch, Reserve classification among healthcare professionals
Question
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
Should AWaRe be used in the hospital?
18 (19.4%)
2 (2.2%)
21 (22.6%)
33 (35.5%)
19 (20.4%)
AWaRe reduces adverse effects of inappropriate prescription
12 (12.9%)
5 (5.4%)
25 (26.9%)
32 (34.4%)
19 (20.4%)
AWaRe threatens a clinician's autonomy
9 (9.7%)
35 (37.6%)
35 (37.6%)
11 (11.8%)
3 (3.2%)
It can delay treatment
16 (17.2%)
37 (39.8%)
28 (30.1%)
8 (8.6%)
4 (4.3%)
Citation: Negi G, KB A, Panda PK. Ground level utility of Access, Watch, Reserve classification: Insights from a tertiary care center in North India. World J Exp Med 2023; 13(5): 123-133