Ibarra-Estrada MA, Chávez-Peña Q, Reynoso-Estrella CI, Rios-Zermeño J, Aguilera-González PE, García-Soto MA, Aguirre-Avalos G. Timing, method and discontinuation of hydrocortisone administration for septic shock patients. World J Crit Care Med 2017; 6(1): 65-73 [PMID: 28224109 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.65]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Miguel A Ibarra-Estrada, Critical Care Unit, Instituto Jalisciense de Cancerología, Coronel Calderón 715, Guadalajara Jalisco 44280, Mexico. drmiguelibarra@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Critical Care Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Crit Care Med. Feb 4, 2017; 6(1): 65-73 Published online Feb 4, 2017. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.65
Table 1 Univariate analysis of demographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes of the study population according to method of administration of hydrocortisone
Characteristics
Continuous infusion (n = 32)
IV bolus (n = 32)
P value
Age, median (IQR)
50 (37-64)
61 (39-70)
0.19
Male gender, n (%)
12 (37.5)
14 (51.9)
0.27
Oncologic disease, n (%)
15 (46.9)
10 (37)
0.45
Surgical patients, n (%)
25 (78.1)
17 (63)
0.2
Infection source, n (%)
Pneumonia
13 (40.6)
13 (48.1)
0.56
Ventilator associated
7 (21.8)
6 (22.2)
0.87
Health care associated
3 (9.3)
4 (12.5)
0.66
Community acquired
3 (9.3)
3 (11.1)
0.52
Abdomen
14 (43.7)
10 (37)
0.6
Soft tissue
4 (12.5)
1 (3.7)
0.23
Urinary tract
1 (3.1)
2 (7.4)
0.45
Other
0 (0)
1 (3.7)
0.27
Diabetes, n (%)
8 (25)
4 (14.8)
0.33
Acute kidney injury, n (%)
14 (43.7)
17 (63)
0.14
Baseline creatinine, mg/dL, median (IQR)
0.8 (0.7-1.4)
1.1 (0.7-1.5)
0.32
ARDS, n (%)
10 (31.2)
11 (40.7)
0.45
APACHE II score (SD)
21 ± 6
21.7 ± 5.6
0.76
SOFA score (SD)
10 ± 2.9
11 ± 2.7
0.16
Vasopressin use, n (%)
12 (37.5)
4 (14.8)
0.5
Maximum NE dose (mcg/kg per minute), median (IQR)
0.25 (0.17-0.36)
0.33 (0.20-0.39)
0.55
Hydrocortisone dose (mg/kg per day), median (IQR)
2.63 ± 0.27
2.75 ± 0.31
0.13
NE to hydrocortisone (h), median (IQR)
8 (4-19.5)
14 (8-31.5)
0.01
Time to shock reversal (h), median (IQR)
59 (47.5-90.5)
108 (63.2-189)
0.001
Shock relapse, n (%)
4 (18.2)
7 (38.9)
0.14
Hydrocortisone tapered, n (%)
10 (41.7)
13 (68.4)
0.08
Diuretic use, n (%)
19 (59.4)
11 (40.7)
0.15
New onset hypernatremia, n (%)
17 (53.1)
18 (66.7)
0.29
New onset hypokalemia, n (%)
12 (37.5)
18 (66.7)
0.02
New onset hyperglycemia, n (%)
19 (59.4)
23 (85.2)
0.03
Superinfection, n (%)
3 (9.4)
5 (18.5)
0.31
Wound dehiscence, n (%)
3 (9.4)
2 (7.4)
0.78
UGIB, n (%)
1 (3.1)
0 (0)
0.35
ICU-AW, n (%)
8 (25)
9 (33.3)
0.48
Vasopressor-free days, median (IQR)
3 (2-5)
2 (0-3.7)
0.12
ICU LOS, median (IQR)
8.5 (6-13)
9 (5-13)
0.81
30-d mortality, n (%)
10 (31.2)
15 (55.6)
0.06
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with new-onset hyperglycemia
Variable
Univariate
P value
Multivariate
P value
NO-H (n = 42)
No NO-H (n = 17)
Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Bolus hydrocortisone, n (%)
19 (45.2)
13 (76.5)
0.04
3.2 (0.5-26.5)
0.99
Hydrocortisone taper, n (%)
20 (64.5)
3 (27.3)
0.03
5.3 (1.8-34.5)
0.04
Diabetes, n (%)
11 (26.2)
1 (5.9)
0.08
6.2 (0.4-79.0)
0.95
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with new-onset hypokalemia
Variable
Univariate
P value
Multivariate
P value
NO-HK (n = 30)
No NO-HK (n = 29)
Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Bolus hydrocortisone, n (%)
12 (40)
20 (69)
0.02
8.5 (1.2-59.9)
0.03
Hydrocortisone taper, n (%)
17 (77.3)
6 (30)
0.002
10.6 (1.5-73.3)
0.01
AKI, n (%)
13 (43.3)
18 (62.1)
0.08
0.1 (0.01-0.8)
0.03
Diuretic use, n (%)
20 (66.7)
10 (34.5)
0.01
6.3 (0.95-42.0)
0.05
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for relevant factors associated with shock reversal
Variable
Univariate
P value
Multivariate
P value
Shock reversal (n = 30)
No-reversal (n = 29)
Adjusted OR (95%CI)
Age (yr), SD
53 ± 16.3
50 ± 16.3
0.46
Male gender, n (%)
15 (36.6)
11 (61.1)
0.08
1.4 (0.21-10.1)
0.68
Medical disease, n (%)
11 (26.8)
6 (33.3)
0.61
Oncologic disease, n (%)
20 (48.8)
5 (27.8)
0.13
1.0 (0.18-6.3)
0.92
AKI, n (%)
17 (41.5)
14 (77.8)
0.01
0.3 (0.05-2.0)
0.23
ARDS, n (%)
12 (29.3)
9 (50)
0.12
2.7 (0.4-16.9)
0.27
Superinfection, n (%)
5 (12.2)
3 (16.7)
0.68
APACHE II score (SD)
20 ± 5.4
23 ± 6.4
0.16
1.1 (0.9-1.3)
0.18
SOFA score (SD)
10 ± 3.0
10 ± 2.4
0.69
Vasopressin use, n (%)
10 (24.4)
6 (33.3)
0.48
2.5 (0.4-15.4)
0.31
Early hydrocortisone ( ≤ 13 h from NE), n (%)
28 (68.3)
2 (11.1)
0.0001
13.8 (1.4-129)
0.02
NE dose at hydrocortisone initiation ≤ 0.28 μg/kg per minute, n (%)
28 (68.3)
2 (11.1)
0.0001
32.4 (2.7-382)
0.005
Citation: Ibarra-Estrada MA, Chávez-Peña Q, Reynoso-Estrella CI, Rios-Zermeño J, Aguilera-González PE, García-Soto MA, Aguirre-Avalos G. Timing, method and discontinuation of hydrocortisone administration for septic shock patients. World J Crit Care Med 2017; 6(1): 65-73