Dziadzko MA, Thongprayoon C, Ahmed A, Tiong IC, Li M, Brown DR, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(2): 165-170 [PMID: 27152259 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Vitaly Herasevich, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. herasevich.vitaly@mayo.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Medical Informatics
Article-Type of This Article
Evidence-Based Medicine
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2016; 5(2): 165-170 Published online May 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.165
Table 1 Critical Care Independent Multidisciplinary Program defined metrics
Metric
Description
Variables needed
M1
Hospital length of stay for ICU graduates - unadjusted
Hospital length of stay is based on all patients discharged from the hospital during the specified time-frame. A patient may have multiple admissions to the ICU
ICU length of stay is based on all patients discharged from the ICU during the specified time-frame
ICU admission ICU discharge
M3
ICU length of stay - adjusted
Adjusted ICU length of stay is based on all patients discharged from the ICU during the specified time-frame. Expected ICU length of stay is the APACHE IV predicted ICU length of stay. Adjusted length of stay is observed ICU length of stay divided by expected ICU length of stay
ICU admission ICU discharge APACHE IV bundle (demographic, vitals, labs, Glasgow coma score, health conditions, time stamps and geolocations, procedures and diagnosis)
M4
ICU readmission rate
Readmission summary is based on all patients admitted to the ICU during the specified time-frame. An admission is counted as a readmission if it is not the patient’s first admission to the ICU during that hospital stay. Readmissions to the same ICU and readmissions within 24 h are summarized
Ventilation summary is based on all patients discharged from the ICU during the specified time- frame. Use of invasive and non-invasive ventilation is summarized as well as the median duration. Numbers for invasive and non-invasive ventilation will not sum to the numbers for ventilation because patients may have both types
ICU admission ICU discharge Duration invasive or non-invasive ventilation for each day of ICU stay
M8
ICU mortality rate - unadjusted
Mortality rate summary is based on all patients discharged from the ICU during the specified time frame. Multiple discharges per patient are allowed
ICU admission ICU discharge Patient status
M9
ICU mortality rate - adjusted
Mortality summary is based on all patients discharged from the ICU during the specified time-frame. Multiple discharges per patient are allowed. Expected ICU mortality is based on each patient’s APACHE IV predicted probability of hospital death. Standard mortality ratio is calculated by dividing observed ICU mortality by expected APACHE IV hospital mortality
ICU admission ICU discharge Patient status APACHE III/IV bundle (demographic, vitals, labs, Glasgow coma score, health conditions, time stamps and geolocations, procedures and diagnosis)
M10
ICU admissions for low-risk monitoring
Low-risk monitoring summary is based on all patients admitted to the ICU during the specified time-frame. Low risk monitoring calculation based on the TISS-28 score[27]. Patients with score 0-13 are considered low-risk monitoring
Citation: Dziadzko MA, Thongprayoon C, Ahmed A, Tiong IC, Li M, Brown DR, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(2): 165-170