Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Crit Care Med. May 4, 2016; 5(2): 121-136
Published online May 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.121
Published online May 4, 2016. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.121
Table 1 The Berlin definition of the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Timing | Within 1 wk of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms |
Chest imaging1 | Bilateral opacities - not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collage, or nodules |
Origin of edema | Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure of fluid overload. Need objective assessment (e.g., echocardiography) to exclude hydrostatic edema if no risk factor present |
Oxygenation2 | |
Mild | 200 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg with PEEP or |
CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O3 | |
Moderate | 100 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg with PEEP or |
CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O | |
Severe | PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100 mmHg with PEEP or CPAP ≥ 5 cmH2O |
Table 2 Meta-analyses on prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients
Meta-analysis | No. of studies included | Total number of patients | Main findings |
Sud et al[138] | 10 | 1867 | Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with severe hypoxemia |
Gattinoni et al[136] | 4 | 1573 | The individual patient meta-analysis of the four major clinical trials available clearly shows that with prone positioning, the absolute mortality of severely hypoxemic ARDS patients may be reduced by approximately 10% |
Lee et al[137] | 11 | 2246 | Ventilation in the prone position significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sufficient duration of prone positioning was statistically significant in associated with a reduction in overall mortality |
Beitler et al[134] | 7 | 2119 | Prone positioning was associated with a significant decrease in RR of death only among studies with low baseline tidal volume |
Tonelli et al[133] | 159 | 20671 | Limited supportive evidence that specific interventions can decrease mortality in ARDS, while low tidal volumes and prone positioning in severe ARDS seem effective |
(93 with overall mortality reported) | |||
(44 trials reported mortality as a primary outcome) | |||
Park et al[139] | 8 | 2141 | Prone positioning tends to reduce the mortality rates in ARDS patients, especially when used in conjunction with a lung protective strategy and longer prone position durations. Prone positioning for ARDS patients should be prioritized over other invasive procedures because related life-threatening complications are rare |
Bloomfield et al[140] | 9 | 2165 | No convincing evidence of benefit nor harm from universal application of prone positioning in adults with hypoxaemia mechanically ventilated in intensive care units Three subgroups (early implementation of prone positioning, prolonged adoption of prone positioning and severe hypoxaemia at study entry) suggested that prone positioning may confer a statistically significant mortality advantage |
Table 3 Absolute and relative contraindications to prone positioning
Absolute |
Unmonitored or significantly increased intracranial pressure |
Unstable vertebral fractures |
Relative |
Difficult airway management |
Tracheal surgery or sternotomy during the previous 15 d |
New tracheostomy (less than 24 h) |
Single anterior chest tube with air leaks |
Serious facial trauma or facial surgery during the previous 15 d |
Increased intraocular pressure |
Hemodynamic instability or recent cardiopulmonary arrest |
Cardiac pacemaker inserted in the last 2 d |
Ventricular assist device |
Intra-aortic balloon pump |
Deep venous thrombosis treated for less than 2 d |
Massive hemoptysis requiring an immediate surgical or interventional radiology procedure |
Continuous dialysis |
Severe chest wall lesions ± rib fractures |
Recent cardiothoracic surgery/unstable mediastinum or open chest |
Multiple trauma with unstabilized fractures |
Femur, or pelvic fractures ± external pelvic fixation |
Pregnant women |
Recent abdominal surgery or stoma formation |
Kyphoscoliosis |
Advanced osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis |
Body weight greater than 135 kg |
Table 4 Potential complications of prone positioning
Edema (facial, airway, limbs, thorax) |
Pressure sores |
Conjunctival hemorrhage |
Compression of nerves and retinal vessels |
Endotracheal tube dislocation (main stem intubation or non-scheduled extubation), obstruction or kinking |
Airway suctioning difficulty |
Transient hypotension or oxygen desaturation |
Worsening gas exchange |
Pneumothorax |
Thoracic drain kinking or obstruction |
Cardiac events |
Inadvertent dislodging of Swan-Ganz catheter |
Vascular catheter kinking or removal |
Vascular catheter malfunction during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration |
Deep venous thrombosis |
Urinary bladder catheter or nasogastric feeding tube displacement |
Enteral nutrition intolerance; vomiting; feeding complications |
Need for increased sedation or muscle paralysis |
Difficulty in instituting cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
- Citation: Koulouras V, Papathanakos G, Papathanasiou A, Nakos G. Efficacy of prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A pathophysiology-based review. World J Crit Care Med 2016; 5(2): 121-136
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v5/i2/121.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i2.121