Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2021; 10(5): 220-231
Published online Sep 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.220
Published online Sep 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.220
Table 1 Univariate analysis of risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infections
Potential risk factor | CLABSI cases, n = 34, n (%) | Control, n = 1600, n (%) | P value1 | |
Age | < 50 yr | 11 (32) | 672 (42) | 0.13 |
> 50 yr | 23 (68) | 928 (58) | ||
Gender | Male | 20 (59) | 880 (55) | 0.32 |
Female | 14 (41) | 720 (45) | ||
Primary clinical diagnosis | Medical | 24 (71) | 1056 (66) | 2.88 |
Surgical | 10 (29) | 544 (34) | ||
Catheter insertion site | Subclavian | 4 (11) | 496 (31) | < 0.05 |
Jugular | 10 (30) | 464 (29) | ||
Femoral | 20 (59) | 640 (40) | ||
ICU time interval from ICU admission till line insertion | < 5 d | 19 (56) | 1408 (88) | < 0.05 |
> 5 d | 15 (44) | 192 (12) | ||
Location of central line insertion | ICU | 20 (59) | 1216 (76) | < 0.05 |
Non-ICU | 14 (41) | 384 (24) | ||
Length of duration central line | < 1 wk | 11 (32) | 1438 (90) | < 0.001 |
> 1 wk | 23 (68) | 162 (10) | ||
Death | 15 (44) | 432 (27) | < 0.01 | |
A live discharge | 19 (54) | 1168 (73) | < 0.01 |
Table 2 The microbiological causes of central line-associated bloodstream infections
Organism | Number (percentage out of total 34), n (%) | MDR organism, n (%) |
Gram negative bacteria | ||
Acinetobacter | 5 (15) | 3 MDR1 (60) |
Escherichia coli | 4 (12) | 1 ESBL (25) 2 CRE (50) |
Pseudomonas | 4 (12) | 2 CRP (50) |
Klebsiella | 3 (8) | 2 CRE (66) |
Morganella | 1 (3) | |
Serratia | 1 (3) | |
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia | 1 (3) | |
Total gram negative | 19 (56) | 10 (53) |
Gram positive bacteria | ||
Enterococcus | 5 (15) | 3 VRE (60) |
Coagulase negative Staphylococcus | 6 (18) | 6 MRCONS (100) |
Staphylococcus aureus | 2 (5) | 1MRSA (50) |
Streptococcus viridans | 1 (3) | |
Total gram positive | 14 (41) | 10 (71) |
Candida species | 1 (3) | |
Total | 34 (100) | 20/34 (59) |
Table 3 Antibiotics sensitivity percentage of the common gram-positive causative organisms for central line-associated bloodstream infections in our study
Antibiotic | Staphylococcus aureus, n (%) = 2 (5) | Coagulase negative Staphylococcus,n (%) = 6 (18) | Enterococcus, n (%) = 5 (15) |
Penicillin | 0/2 (0) | 0/6 (0) | 1/5 (20) |
Ampicillin | 1/5 (20) | ||
Erythromycin | 1/2 (50) | 0/6 (0) | 0/5 (0) |
Clinamycin | 1/2 (50) | 3/6 (50) | |
Trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole | 1/2 (50) | 1/6 (16) | |
Vancomycin | 2/2 (100) | 6/6 (100) | 2/5 (40) |
Cloxacillin | 1/2 (50) | 0/6 (0) | |
Tetracycline | 1/2 (50) | 3/6 (50) | |
Linazolid | 2/2 (100) | 6/6 (100) | 5/5 (100) |
Daptomycin | 2/2 (100) | 6/6 (100) | 5/5 (100) |
Table 4 Antibiotics sensitivity percentage of the common gram-negative causative organisms for central line-associated bloodstream infections in our study
Antimicrobial agent | Acinetobacter baumanii | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Escherichia coli | Klebsiella |
n (%) = 5 (15) | n (%) = 4 (12) | n (%) = 4 (12) | n (%) = 3 (9) | |
Piperacillin tazobactam | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | ||
Ceftriaxone | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) | ||
Ceftazidime | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) |
Cefipime | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) |
Merpenem | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 2/4 (50) | 1/3 (33) |
Imipenem | 2/5 (40) | 2/4 (50) | 2/4 (50) | 1/3 (33) |
Ciprofloxacin | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) |
Gentamicin | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) |
Amikacin | 2/5 (40) | 4/4 (100) | 1/4 (25) | 1/3 (33) |
Colistin | 5/5 (100) | 4/4 (100) | 4/4 (100) | 3/3 (100) |
- Citation: Al-Khawaja S, Saeed NK, Al-khawaja S, Azzam N, Al-Biltagi M. Trends of central line-associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit in the Kingdom of Bahrain: Four years’ experience. World J Crit Care Med 2021; 10(5): 220-231
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v10/i5/220.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.220