Letter to the Editor
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2025; 14(1): 98938
Published online Mar 9, 2025. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i1.98938
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flangeless video laryngoscope compared with conventional laryngoscopes. A: Flangeless video laryngoscope parts; B: Successful insertion of the flangeless video laryngoscope blade in a limited mouth opening; C: Successful insertion of the flangeless video laryngoscope blade in a limited mouth opening with successful nasal intubation; D and E: Unsuccessful insertion of the laryngoscope blade of the traditional video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope.