Yonemura Y, Canbay E, Endou Y, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, Li Y, Liu Y, Takeshita K, Ichinose M, Takao N, Saitou T, Noguchi K, Hirano M, Glehen O, Brűcher B, Sugarbaker PH. Comprehensive treatment for the peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(2): 187-197 [DOI: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i2.187]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yutaka Yonemura, MD, PhD, Director, NPO to Support Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Treatment, Oosaka, Kishiwada 596-0032, Japan. y.yonemura@coda.ocn.ne.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Surg Proced. Jul 28, 2015; 5(2): 187-197 Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i2.187
Table 1 Peritoneal wash cytology before and after bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
Cytology
Cytology after BIPSC
Before BIPSC
Negative
Positive
Total
Negative
15
0
15
Positive
26 (79%)
7
33
41
7
48
Table 2 Peritoneal wash cytology before and after neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy
Cytology
Cytology after NIPS
Before NIPS
Negative
Positive
Total
Negative
47
1
48
Positive
69 (70%)
30
99
116
31
147
Table 3 Histoloogic effects of primary tumor and peritoneal carcinomatosis in 41 patients after bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
EF-0
EF-1
EF-2
EF-3
Total
Primary tumors
3 (12%)
15 (58%)
7 (27%)
1 (4%)
26 (100%)
Peritoneal metastasis
7 (17%)
18 (44%)
7 (17%)
9 (22%)
41 (100%)
Table 4 Histoloogic effects of primary tumor and peritoneal carcinomatosis in 147 patients with PC treated with neoadjuvant intraperitoneal/systemic chemotherapy
EF-0
EF-1
EF-2
EF-3
Total
Primary tumors
13 (18%)
38 (54%)
20 (28%)
0
71 (100%)
Peritoneal metastasis
59 (40%)
35 (24%)
14 (10%)
39 (25%)
147 (100%)
Table 5 Side effects during bidirectional intraperitoneal and systemic induction chemotherapy
Grade 0
Grade 1-2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Total
44 (76%)
8 (14%)
4 (7%)
2 (3%)
0 (0%)
58
Table 6 Multivariate analysis of 304 patients with peritoneal metastasis treated with a comprehensive treatmnent
Prognostic factors
χ2
P value
HR
95%CI
Sex male vs female
0.263
0.60752
0.9218
0.676
1.257
CC score: complete vs incomplete
4.03
0.04468
1.504
1.01
2.24
Nodal involvement: N0-1 vs N2-3
0.445
0.50454
1.1338
0.784
1.639
Neoadjuvant chemo.: negative vs positive
2.517
0.11259
1.3445
0.933
1.938
PCI: ≤ 6 vs≥ 7
8.809
0.00299
1.7863
1.218
2.621
HIPEC: Not done vs done
8.218
0.00414
0.6322
0.462
0.865
Histilogicl effects: EF 0-1 vs EF 2-3
12.305
0.00045
0.469
0.307
0.716
Cytology: Negative vs positive
8.2163
0.00415
1.8458
1.213
2.806
Citation: Yonemura Y, Canbay E, Endou Y, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, Li Y, Liu Y, Takeshita K, Ichinose M, Takao N, Saitou T, Noguchi K, Hirano M, Glehen O, Brűcher B, Sugarbaker PH. Comprehensive treatment for the peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5(2): 187-197